Author: Timothy Donahue

  • Lack of Enforcement

    Lack of Enforcement

    The UKVIA forum offered insight into the most significant threats to the U.K. vaping industry.

    By George Gay

    The U.K. vaping industry, which has benefited from some progressive government policies in the past, nevertheless found itself with the sword of Damocles hanging over its head as participants met in London for the annual forum of the U.K. Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) on Nov. 10. And I am not being overly dramatic here.

    As part of his forum presentation, the Conservative Member of Parliament Adam Afriyie warned attendees that the U.K. “could go the way of Australia in the blink of an eye”—and he wasn’t talking galahs and wombats; he was referring, I assume, to a generally very restrictive vaping environment, though not necessarily to the specific prescription-based medicalization of vaping in that country.

    What was at the back of everybody’s mind on Nov. 10 was a government consultation on smoking and vaping issued in October and due to end on Dec. 6, which made the theme of the forum, “Accelerating action: Securing a world without smoking,” something of an object lesson in being careful what you wish for.

    The consultation includes a proposal to make it an offense to sell any product containing tobacco to those born on or after Jan. 1, 2009, which would raise the legal smoking age by a year annually until it applies to the whole population. The government claims this has the potential to almost completely phase out tobacco smoking among young people by 2040.

    Worryingly for the vaping industry, some might suggest this policy would be a way of single-handedly ensuring a U.K. without tobacco smoking, eliminating the need for products that can substitute for combustible cigarettes, such as vapes. And for those wedded to the idea that vapers should be drawn only from the ranks of smokers, it would mean the vaping industry had a limited future, one where, within a predictable timeframe, it would simply be managing decline.

    On the other hand, some might argue that with one of the UKVIA’s goals being to support the government in reaching its 2030 smoke-free target, and given the government’s claims about the damage caused by tobacco smoking being so alarming, timing is of the essence and that vaping can help things along, though the idea that it is necessary to act speedily is perhaps undermined by the facts that the risk of cigarette smoking has been known about for more than half a century, and substitute products have been around for even longer.

    Credit: Fotolia Premium

    On the other hand, if I haven’t run out of hands, the future might not look this bleak because there is the usually unspoken argument, with which I would agree, that vapers need not be recruited only from the ranks of smokers. We must be grown up and realize that some people will, for the foreseeable future, seek recreational drugs, and nicotine delivered through vaping must be a better, less risky candidate than many others on offer, especially alcohol, which surely must be the subject of the next government consultation.

    But I digress. There are proposals in the consultation that forum participants will likely have considered to be more directly threatening than a creeping tobacco smoking ban. “The U.K. government and devolved administrations [those in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales] have a duty to protect our children from the potential harms associated with underage vaping while their lungs and brains are still developing,” the consultation says in part. “So, the U.K. government and devolved administrations are consulting on several proposals on youth vaping, including restricting flavors, regulating point-of-sale displays, regulating packaging and presentation, considering restricting the supply and sale of disposable vapes, whether regulations should extend to non-nicotine vapes and taking action on the affordability of vapes.

    What I find a little concerning about the above is that, unless the consultation document was put together by people who started messing with nicotine before their brains had fully developed, it seems to have been written in something of a rush. The fourth proposal is apparently about “consulting on … considering restricting,” which seems a mite convoluted. And the fifth proposal goes into passive mode whereby the regulations might extend, seemingly of their own accord. That is creepy.

    These might seem to be minor semantic matters, but I’m not sure they are because they reflect on how much time and effort went into producing the consultation document and, more worryingly perhaps, suggest that not enough time will go into examining the submissions. Afriyie, who is the vice-chair of the All-party Parliamentary Group for Vaping, suggested the U.K.’s civil servants were well informed and committed to the U.K.’s principle of harm reduction and would make a good job of reviewing the consultation, ensuring submissions were evidence based and making pragmatic recommendations to ministers. I wish I were so confident.

    Civil servants presumably wrote the consultation, which is not in my view objective but comes with an agenda. The sixth paragraph kicks off with an almost meaningless statement: “No other consumer product kills up to two-thirds of its users.”

    Glossing over the fact that no “product” had been identified by this stage of the text and that, therefore, to refer to “no other product” was meaningless, it is the case that “up to two-thirds” could mean none, which was perhaps not what the writers had in mind. And the word “kills,” though almost universally used, is clearly misleading. This is not to denigrate civil servants, just to point out that they are probably too few in numbers fully to perform the tasks assigned to them.

    Credit: WavebreakMediaMicro

    I worry the government believes that what it is dealing with here is not a health matter but a political one, especially given that a general election is likely to be called next year. Addressing the attendees about vaping by those underage, Afriyie, who is not standing at the next election, said, “… if any of your products, I mean any of them, have fancy colors or have packaging or have names or have flavors with names that would even vaguely appeal to young people, can I just say, just stop.

    Because if next year I come to this conference and we’ve gone the route of Australia, do you know, it will be your fault. It will be your fault for not policing the industry and ensuring that you are absolutely responsible in your new role of healthcare.”

    Of course, the UKVIA has no powers to police the industry. The association can encourage and cajole its members to ensure their products do not specifically appeal to those underage, but then it is unlikely that its members will be the ones to step out of line.

    There is no doubt that vapes are getting into the hands of those who are too young legally to buy them, but, for a long time, the UKVIA has been telling the government about this trend and suggesting remedial actions that could be taken, including the licensing of retailers and heavy fines for those who recklessly sell vapes to those underage. Not only have such suggestions fallen on deaf ears, but successive Conservative governments have run a ruthless and reckless decade-long program of austerity that has, in part, decimated the organizations charged with policing retail activities.

    According to a press note issued by Arcus Compliance on Nov. 9, the day before the forum was held, a leading academic at Imperial College London had reported that the budgets of one of those organizations, Trading Standards, had been halved: cut by an estimated £200 million ($254.04 million) since 2010.

    Data gathered through Freedom of Information requests by Arcus Compliance reportedly showed that across 11 major provincial U.K. cities, which have a shared population of more than 5.5 million people, just 21 successful prosecutions had been made against retailers for underage/illicit sales between 2021 and early 2023. Further, the total amount of fines handed down across these cities over the same period was £2,188.

    The managing director of Arcus Compliance, Robert Sidebottom, who was co-chair of the forum, said the concerning lack of enforcement in the form of prosecutions and penalties demonstrated the system was in serious distress.

    “The government has now pledged £30 million to help intercept illegal tobacco and vaping goods at the border and to tackle youth access,” he was quoted in the press note as saying. “While this is a welcome development, we can’t just slap a multimillion-pound Band-Aid on the issue of underage and illicit vape sales and call it a day—especially if parliamentarians move on considerations to restrict the sale of disposable vapes.”

    This was a theme addressed by John Dunne, the UKVIA’s director general, in his forum presentation. While acknowledging that it was necessary to urgently address what he described as the unintended consequences of sales to those underage, the sale of illicit products and the environmental damage caused by vapes, he pointed out that while current regulations were not being enforced, it made no sense to add further punitive regulations to the industry’s operations.

    John Dunne

    Dunne, whose job must have been made hugely more difficult in recent times by the almost constant churning within ministerial departments caused by the unstable, almost unhinged, turmoil within the ruling Conservative Party, expressed concern that the contents of the vaping consultation had been swayed by the court of public opinion, driven in turn by click-bait journalism, and therefore threatened “to undo all of the good work that our sector has done in being the most disruptive force in history in addressing the most preventable cause of death, which is smoking.”

    The forum, which apparently is now the biggest business-to-business event in the U.K., was well organized and held within a comfortable, well-run venue, the QEII Centre in Westminster, London. There was a program of practical panel discussions and presentations, which included an address by Weinuo Ao, the secretary general of the China Electronic Chamber of Commerce, which, in cooperation with the UKVIA, organized the first trade delegation of Chinese companies to attend a UKVIA forum.

    There was a panel session on the thorny, seemingly unresolvable, problem of trying to change public perceptions about vaping for the better and one on the equally thorny and divisive subject of addressing the environmental impact of vapes. It is almost painful to see how both of these issues, like the enforcement issue, are largely out of the industry’s hands.

    Enforcement is in the hands of the government, and changing perceptions would require those currently spreading misleading information about vaping to stop what they are doing, while it is consumers who should, in their own interests, take the environmental issue in hand by not carelessly discarding their vapes.

    One panel discussed the future of vaping, another looked at the future of retailing and yet another examined whether in the future it would be possible or even desirable to take harm reduction to a new level—perhaps beyond the 95 percent less risky figure normally quoted in the U.K.

    Alongside the forum was a mini-exhibition, and an awards dinner followed, co-compared by Marina Murphy, senior director of scientific and medical affairs at ANDS, and Sairah Salim-Sartoni, founder of Salim-Sartoni Associates. Sixteen awards were up for grabs, including one for most supportive parliamentarian, which went to Afriyie.

    Finally, whereas my take on the forum was that the most significant threats to the vaping industry in the U.K. were being caused by a lack of enforcement of current regulations, there was hope. For instance, from my observations, the government could take its enforcement activities to a new level simply by taking some lessons from Sidebottom and his co-chair, Jeannie Cameron, the CEO of JCIC International and the first woman to chair a UKVIA forum.

    Sidebottom, who is ex-military, and Cameron ran the show like a military operation, and I don’t mean a retreat. Presentation timings were policed strictly with Sidebottom threatening stragglers with being grasped in a headlock and dragged from the stage and Cameron saying something about a whip. Unless I was mistaken, at least one participant was stopped mid-sentence …

  • An Optimistic Look Back

    An Optimistic Look Back

    Credit: Sunshower Shots

    The vapor industry may finally be able to be optimistic about the future after 2023’s roller coaster ride.

    By Chris Howard

    In February of this year, Vapor Voice published my reflections on my past 11 years affiliated with the vapor industry. And while many would say that the vapor industry has been a roller coaster, I remain firm in my belief that a place for vapor products exists in a United States harm reduction strategy. That said, the way things are going at present, it could be years before we see this materialize.

    At the end of yet another tumultuous year for the vapor industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), now seems like a good time to review my perceptions from February. What have we seen in 2023? On the one hand, the CTP is clearly reacting to the Reagan-Udall Foundation (RUF) process.

    The center is prioritizing stakeholder engagement with, for example, in-person visits between Director Brian King and companies throughout the industry and a recent public meeting on the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) process. Cynics, on the other hand, would be quick to criticize the center, as flavored disposable vapor products appear virtually unrestricted in retail stores across the nation and the PMTA process remains stagnant. Moreover, the progression to more vapor marketing denial orders (menthol) and the promotion of more bans and prohibitions (flavors, cigars, menthol) are also troublesome.

    With the above in mind, let’s reflect on what I wrote earlier this year (see “Head in the Clouds,” Vapor Voice, Issue 2, 2023) and discuss what lies ahead in 2024 and beyond.

    Make a Long Story Short

    In February, I wrote about suggestions from the RUF for the CTP to provide “more detailed summaries of applications that have made it through the process—so that industry can place emphasis on areas that the agency deems to be a higher priority and eliminate superfluous activities that ultimately add little value. Doing this and taking steps to simplify the requirements would ultimately enable both the industry and the CTP to employ a more focused approach, resulting in greater efficiency for all involved.”

    The good news is that FDA leadership continues to signal this is a priority for the agency. Moreover, the FDA recently held a public meeting in which they provided additional insight regarding the PMTA process that many in the industry have been seeking. Unfortunately, thousands of PMTAs remain pending, and it is unclear how the FDA will handle this existing burden. Expectations remain high for 2024, and I am optimistic we will see progress soon.

    You Get Out What You Put In

    Reflecting on the difficulty of the PMTA process, I pointed out the exceptionally high standard the FDA has set for premarket review and that companies cannot take shortcuts and expect good results. We all recognize the standards set for tobacco-derived nicotine products are very high, and many applications fell short of even the minimum requirements.

    Looking forward, we should expect this high standard to also be applied to PMTAs filed for nontobacco nicotine (NTN) products. The CTP will apply the same rigor when reviewing NTN products—likely with similar results. Industry cannot expect to file short shrift applications and receive market orders. Time, rigor and resources are required to be successful.

    Don’t Hold Your Breath

    Credit: Ezume Images

    Recall that I suggested it would take the FDA considerable time to increase the efficiency of the PMTA approval process. This continues to be true. And now even more stakeholders are voicing this same concern. Most recently, the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report titled “The Food and Drug Administration Needs to Improve the Premarket Tobacco Application Review Process for Electronic Nicotine-Delivery Systems to Protect Public Health.”

    The OIG audit, in part, focused on the CTP’s inability to review PMTAs within the statutory timeframes and contained a key recommendation “that CTP work with the Office of Personnel Management to obtain direct-hire authority to assist CTP in reaching its full-time equivalent personnel goal and assess the PMTA review process and develop an action plan to resolve the backlog of PMTA applications and achieve compliance with the 180-day statutory timeline.” Ultimately, the report offers yet another series of solutions to what appears to be insurmountable obstacles faced by the FDA.

    On the flipside, as the CTP learns more and, hopefully, becomes more efficient in application review, we will most certainly begin to see a more consistent and reliable process. While nothing on the horizon suggests the evidence required to satisfy the “appropriate for the protection of public health” (APPH) standard will lessen, my hope is that we are approaching some level of predictability that will enable companies to refocus on innovation and invest in reduced-harm products.

    Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right

    Credit: Jon Anders Wiken

    In February, I suggested two wrongs were prevalent in the vapor space. One was the uptick of youth use of vapor products. The other was the sensationalized public health response prioritizing prohibition and often disregarding the opportunity lost by adult smokers seeking alternatives to cigarettes. While we certainly haven’t seen much movement from many in public health, we have seen progress when it comes to youth choices.

    In 2019, the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) reported a shocking 20 percent past 30-day (high school and middle school combined) e-cigarette use. The 2019 report also indicated 27.5 percent of high school students and 10.5 percent of middle school students used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days. Fast-forward four short years and those numbers have decreased dramatically. In 2023, the NYTS reported significant reductions with 7.7 percent overall, 10 percent high school and 4.6 percent middle school past 30-day e-cigarette use. These results clearly indicate that tools like Tobacco 21, public education campaigns and parental engagement work to change youth behaviors.

    And it’s worth noting that this reduction occurred despite the proliferation of the noncompliant flavored disposable e-cigarettes available throughout the nation. Unfortunately, instead of lauding success and working to make electronic nicotine-delivery systems more available to adult cigarette smokers, prohibition remains a priority for many, so we still have work to do to prioritize the benefits of reduced harm products for smokers.

    When Life Gives You Lemons, Make Lemonade

    Credit: Pontus

    In February, I indicated, “smokers deserve our efforts to offer satisfying, reduced harm products ….” I still believe that a place for innovation exists in the vapor space. As technology develops and youth vaping numbers continue to decline, new opportunities are inevitable. Of course, the pitfalls associated with long lead time (and expensive) PMTA data development and even longer agency review processes still impede modernization of the category.

    That said, the hope is that a better, more predictable, timely and stable review process will take hold. To effect this change, vapor advocates must continue to hold the CTP accountable for implementing reforms in line with RUF recommendations. To be clear, this is a total industry effort. By weeding out bad actors, promoting compliance and continuing to advocate for the lives of smokers, we can succeed in this effort.

    I closed my article in February with the hope that I would look back at the end of 2023 to see that the CTP has evolved and used the RUF report to prioritize the continuum of risk and move harm reduction forward. Are we there yet? Unfortunately, no. But that said, I am optimistic that the worst is behind us. Vapor advocates are not giving up, and they don’t seem like they will throw in the towel anytime soon.

    More and more smokers are quitting cigarettes with vapor products. And the FDA is gradually making changes to increase efficiency and effectiveness. Hopefully by this time next year, we will be in an even better place with the increased certainty we are seeking.

    Chris Howard is executive vice president of new product compliance and external affairs for Swisher and former senior vice president, general counsel and chief compliance officer for E-Alternative Solutions.

  • Indonesia Imposes 10% Excise Tax on Vape Products

    Indonesia Imposes 10% Excise Tax on Vape Products

    Indonesia will start imposing a tax on e-cigarettes from the start of 2024.

    The additional levy is on top of the existing excise levy as the country steps up efforts to limit consumption in Southeast Asia’s largest economy.

    E-cigarettes will be taxed at 10% of the prevailing excise rate, according to a finance ministry regulation, according to media reports.

    In Indonesia, tobacco products are subject to two levies — at central and local government levels — of which 50% of the revenue is earmarked for public health services.

    “Long term consumption of electronic cigarettes has been shown to affect people’s health,” the finance ministry said, adding the tax on e-cigarettes is also needed to level the playing field with conventional cigarettes.

    A group of e-cigarette producers and customers (PAVENAS) criticized the lack of discussion and the timing of the implementation of the tax, considering excise tariffs for the product will increase next year.

    The group said in a statement it may consider going to court to challenge the tax if the government goes ahead with it.

  • Judge Grants Stay for Multnomah County Flavor Ban

    Judge Grants Stay for Multnomah County Flavor Ban

    Credit: Stock Pics

    Multnomah County’s flavored tobacco ban is now on hold.

    The flavor ban in the largest county in Oregon was set to go into effect on Jan. 1.

    In a ruling Friday, the Oregon Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay against the policy, pending ongoing litigation.

    The owner of a local vape shop said they were preparing to pull dozens of products off their shelves before getting the news.

    He said flavored products make up 90% of their business, according to KATU news.

    “It was going to be a trip. Like I’d have zero nicotine devices available, but again, those aren’t like a popular seller, so it was going to take some strategy to even to be able to stay in business,” said Marcus Nettles, owner of Rose City Vapers.

  • Michigan Governor ‘Open’ to Taxing Vape as Tobacco

    Michigan Governor ‘Open’ to Taxing Vape as Tobacco

    Credit: Vepar5

    The governor of Michigan says she is “open” to the idea of expanding the state’s combustible tobacco taxation policy to include vaping products.

    “I’m not leading with that… but if it’s something the legislature wanted to send to my desk, I’d have a conversation with them about it,” she said in a recent interview. “I’m open to it.”

    She has also said she seeks to enact a flavor ban on tobacco products and would sign a bill if passed. In November, S.B. 649 was introduced in the Michigan Senate. 

    The bill calls for the ban of the sales of flavored vaping and other tobacco products, defined as any product that has or is marketed as having a characterizing flavor other than tobacco.

    The bill would ban the sale of products packaged in ways that “indicate, explicitly or implicitly, that the nicotine or tobacco product has characterizing flavor.”

    That bill would not exempt flavored cigars, though it does carve out an exemption for flavored hookah tobacco intended for on-site consumption.

  • Oregon’s Largest County to Ban Flavored Nicotine

    Oregon’s Largest County to Ban Flavored Nicotine

    Credit: Robert Appleby

    The largest county in Oregon, the 27th largest U.S. state, will ban all flavored nicotine products other than tobacco beginning January 1. Multnomah County will go into effect after surviving a court challenge.

    Last week, Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge Benjamin Souede denied a request by the tobacco industry to halt enforcement of the county ordinance.

    The decision paves the way for Oregon’s largest county to become the first in the state to ban flavored tobacco, according to media reports.

    Earlier this year in Salem, state lawmakers considered House Bill 3090, which would have enacted a similar ban statewide. It had the support of one Republican lawmaker, Sen. Bill Hansell of Athena, and two Portland physicians, Rep. Lisa Reynolds and Sen. Elizabeth Steiner.

    It passed out of the House health care committee on a party-line vote, with Democrats in favor and Republicans against, but died in the Joint Ways and Means Committee.

  • Kaival Brands Promotes Hopkins to CEO, President

    Kaival Brands Promotes Hopkins to CEO, President

    A former Altria executive has been promoted to CEO and resident of Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. The company announced that it has expanded the role of Executive Chairman Barry Hopkins to include the additional positions.

    Former CEO and president, Eric Mosser, has been appointed CEO and president of Kaival Brands International, a Kaival Brands Innovations Group’s subsidiary with an international licensing relationship with Philip Morris Products S.A., a wholly owned affiliate of Philip Morris International Inc.

    Niraj Patel, founder and chief science officer of Kaival Brands, said that from the beginning he has envisioned a diverse platform that could “capture the tailwinds” generated by the company’s core offering, the BIDI Stick electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) product.

    “Barry understands this vision, the importance of regulatory compliance and youth access prevention, and has done an exceptional job since joining Kaival Brands. He has eagerly taken on increasing levels of responsibility, leveraging his decades of experience in management in our industry,” said Patel in a press release. “His appointment as Interim CEO and president was a natural progression, and we look forward to potentially expanding our excellent management team further during 2024 with a permanent CEO and/or president as our needs dictate.

    “Having Barry in this position now is particularly important since we are at a significant inflection point, as we remain hopeful that FDA will soon complete its review of the pending premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) for the tobacco-flavored BIDI Stick Classic. If we receive a marketing granted order for this product, we will have significant momentum in the new year with the ability to continue to transition adult cigarette smokers, drive revenue and grow our company.”

    According to a recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration announcement, the agency’s next status report regarding its review of the still-pending PMTAs for major brands and market share leading ENDS products is due to be filed by January 22, 2024 with the U.S. District Court in Maryland.

    Although FDA has not indicated publicly which PMTAs it is prioritizing for review, Kaival Brands is hopeful that the BIDI Stick Classic will be included in the January status report. The company also anticipates the PMTAs for the other 10 BIDI-branded SKUs will remain in scientific review, according to Patel.

    Recently, the Kaival Brands has been encouraged by the coordinated efforts of the FDA, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and other government agencies to increase their coordinated focus on enforcement. The company believes it has been hurt by illicit vaping products flooding the market, and it is now preparing to scale along with other legal products, assuming increased enforcement continues alongside the January announcement by the FDA.

    “Hopkins will spearhead the company under the direction of the Board of Directors with a continued focus on accelerating revenue growth, improving operational efficiencies and executing Kaival Brands’ strategic growth and diversification initiatives, while remaining in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations.

    “The company, alongside BIDI Vapor (the maker of the BIDI Stick), is also continuing to focus on working with Philip Morris to accelerate the international distribution of ENDS products using BIDI technology (which Philip Morris markets under the brand name ‘VEEV Now’), as part of Philip Morris’s plan to deliver a smoke-free future.”

  • Raising the Bar: Huml Reviews the Flonq Max

    Raising the Bar: Huml Reviews the Flonq Max

    The Flonq Max packs a lot into a small package in terms of value, vape quality and flavor choice.

    By Mike Huml

    The Flonq Max is one of the more unique-looking pod systems on the market today. With a rounded design, it definitely looks a bit odd at first but not in a way that would draw attention or come off as tactless. It does, however, show a level of design inspiration that isn’t often seen in the world of disposable vapes.

    While the technology beneath the shell isn’t exactly innovative, the fantastic implementation of currently existing technology shines brightly in the vape quality of the Flonq Max. This disposable pod system may not break the mold in terms of innovation, but the quality and value that it offers more than make up for any contrived new features that are largely unnecessary for pod systems.

    At first glance, the Flonq Max looks very different from other pod systems and disposables. While other products mostly fall into the box shape with rounded edges, the Flonq is mostly rounded with one flat edge on which to set down the device. It more closely resembles a medical device, and perhaps that is by design.

    It’s slightly larger than comparable devices but very light and easy to hold. The rounded, egg-like shape makes it easier for vapers with smaller hands to palm, for those with a preference. The Flonq Max has a glossy finish, but it doesn’t seem to retain fingerprints, possibly due to it being white. Overall, the Flonq Max is a bit chunkier than comparable pod systems, but the size is warranted due to the high battery and e-liquid capacities.

    The Flonq Max houses a large 650 mAh battery and contains 14 mL of e-liquid with a strength of 35 mg. For average users, this is roughly 7 days’ to 10 days’ worth of e-liquid and at least one day’s worth of battery life. Heavier users may need to charge the Flonq Max more often; however, it does feature passthrough functionality and can be used while charging.

    Any USB Type-C cable can be used to charge the Flonq Max, and a full charge can be achieved in under 30 minutes. A single white LED located on the flat edge of the device illuminates when a drag is taken or when it is charging. It will also blink several times when the user attempts to take a drag with a low battery, indicating that a charge is needed. The Flonq Max is draw-activated with no buttons or menus to worry about. It is extremely simple to use, and even new users should be able to get vaping within seconds, even with no prior knowledge.

    Each Flonq Max comes included with a built-in mesh coil heating element. Mesh coils are ideal for pod systems as they require lower power to produce adequate vapor, which extends battery life and ensures peak efficiency when it comes to the e-liquid. The 14 mL capacity is advertised as the equivalent of 8,000 puffs, but this is difficult to determine without an included puff counter. However, as a rough guideline, the average user can expect large-capacity devices such as the Flonq Max to last for one week before the e-liquid starts to run dry.

    Aesthetically, the Flonq Max is definitely unique and stands apart from the competition without drawing too much attention or being too flashy. Technologically, the features are fairly standard for disposable devices—a hefty battery, large e-liquid capacity and a mesh coil all contribute to voluminous vapor and admirable efficiency.

    In terms of vape quality, while the Flonq Max doesn’t stand head and shoulders above the competition, it is certainly up there with the best of them. There are a variety of flavors offered, and each is as clean and bold as the last. Vapor production is indeed impressive as well, but the Flonq Max isn’t unique in that regard. The one area in which the Flonq Max can claim the top prize is the draw. The airflow of this device is extremely smooth.

    Airflow enters through a pinhole on the flat edge of the device, as per usual with disposable devices, but the draw has no perceptible turbulence and never causes spitback. Although the airflow is not adjustable, it’s balanced perfectly for mouth-to-lung vaping. Again, like most other pod systems and disposables, direct-to-lung vaping is technically possible but is not recommended due to the restricted airflow and high nicotine concentration.

    When it comes to flavors, the Flonq Max also stands out from the crowd due to the sheer variety. Other brands do have many flavors but mostly include fruits. The Flonq Max does have fruit flavors, such as Watermelon Ice, Cherry Peach and Grape, but it breaks from the mold a bit with other flavors not generally seen in disposables such as Milk Chocolate, Strawberry Ice Cream and Yummy Bear.

    Mike Huml
    Mike Huml has been vaping since 2009 and has been working in the vapor industry for more than five years. He has extensive experience in various industry segments, including purchasing, quality assurance and content creation.

    There is even a flavorless option called Clear, which is rare to see. Instead of a multitude of vaguely differentiated fruit flavors, the Flonq Max truly offers options for vapers of different tastes. Each flavor is available in a strength of 35 mg, which is a good middle ground that should appeal to the majority of vapers.

    Even with a relatively high nicotine strength, the throat hit is not overbearing. There is certainly a satisfying kick with each drag, but the airflow does a fantastic job of mitigating any harshness. The salt form of nicotine used in the Flonq Max and many other mouth-to-lung devices also mellows out the harshness of the nicotine very well.

    The vapor production of the Flonq Max is also impressive in that a light draw will produce a nice cloud comparable to a traditional cigarette, if not more. Many lower quality vapes out there require a good amount of huffing and puffing with little payoff, but with the Flonq Max, it’s effortless.

    The mesh heating element and smooth airflow are paired perfectly to produce an easy, relaxing vape experience. What’s more, the airflow is as close to silent as has been possible up to this point in time. Even with more aggressive drags, it can be difficult to hear the sound of the draw, which only adds to that “smooth” vaping experience.

    A word on value: The Flonq Max can be had for $18 to $30 at a retail level, which is right around average for disposable devices. For heavy users, this can accumulate quickly but is still cheaper than smoking a pack of cigarettes per day. Most users will find that the price is reasonable for a week’s worth of hassle-free and maintenance-free vaping.

    So the price may be a selling point but not one that would push a potential customer toward the Flonq Max over a similar product. However, given the price, the flavor selection has the potential to be a major selling point. Fruit flavors are a dime a dozen, and it’s becoming harder and harder to find bakery or beverage flavors.

    The Flonq Max offers those flavors as well as fruit and fruit-and-menthol flavors, leaving room for users to try out not just different flavors but entirely new categories of flavors. For shop owners that also sell bottled e-liquid and refillable devices, the Flonq Max could be a great way to expose customers to a wider variety of products.

    The Flonq Max doesn’t do anything particularly groundbreaking, but is doesn’t necessarily need to. What is does, it does very well, and it’s always a good idea to not overcomplicate a tried-and-true product design that appeals to a wide range of vapers. The mesh heating element produces big, flavorful clouds and keeps the power and e-liquid consumption to a minimum.

    The large battery only needs to be charged once per day for most normal users and doesn’t add any unnecessary hassle. The star of the show here is really the airflow. While it’s not adjustable, it doesn’t need to be as it’s perfectly smooth and quiet as is. And again, airflow and other added features would only take away from the smooth design aesthetic and simplicity that is extremely important for disposable devices.

    While the shape may take some getting used to, it should also be noted that since it can only be set down on the one flat edge, that edge does a nice job of keeping the device from tipping over. It’s a small thing, but many pod systems and disposables are on the thinner side, and that causes them to topple when a table is bumped.

    When set down on the flat side, the Flonq Max is very difficult to knock over. In any case, the shape works. It’s unique and helps the Flonq Max stand apart from its peers without being offensive to the eye. And with the theme of the Flonq Max appearing to be “a smooth vaping experience,” the smooth, rounded aesthetic ties in nicely.

    The Flonq Max packs a lot into a small package in terms of value, vape quality and flavor choice. It leans toward simplicity and smoothness rather than innovation and features, and there’s nothing wrong with that. The Flonq Max is a great disposable in and of itself, and that’s something that’s readily apparent to anyone who tries it. It may be just another disposable, but it’s not just another disposable.

  • California Files Lawsuit Against 2 Online Vape Shops

    California Files Lawsuit Against 2 Online Vape Shops

    Credit: Niro World

    California has filed lawsuits against two online retailers of vaping products.

    Attorney General Rob Bonta alleges that the California companies violated state and federal laws governing tobacco sales and the state’s Unfair Competition Law, in part by failing to properly verify the ages of consumers before selling them tobacco products and by selling tobacco products through remote sales transactions.

    The complaints against the company and its CEO (together, “Ejuicesteals”) as well as E-Juice Vapor, Inc. along with an affiliated entity and individuals (collectively, “E-Juice Vapor”) allege multiple violations of California tobacco sale laws, including failing to comply with age verification requirements and with various shipping and delivery requirements, according to JD Supra.

    The AG’s office requests injunctive and equitable relief, civil penalties, damages, and costs.

  • January 1 Start to New York Vape Marketing Rules

    January 1 Start to New York Vape Marketing Rules

    Credit: Reuben Teo

    New York expanded its tobacco product marketing and event sponsorship laws to apply to vaping products in October. The new rules will begin on January 1st, 2024.

    The expanded law specifically prohibits:

    • E-cigarette manufacturers and distributors from selling or marketing e-cigarette branded items (other than actual e-cigarettes or accessories). The prohibition explicitly excludes retailer point-of-sale promotions.
    • Gifts in exchange for the purchase of e-cigarettes.
    • Sponsorship of athletic, musical, artistic, social, or cultural events or teams with branded e-cigarette images or logos. Sponsorships using corporation names are permitted.