Category: Flavors

  • Biden Likely To Ban Menthol, News Reports Suggest

    Biden Likely To Ban Menthol, News Reports Suggest

    Photo: kasetch

    The Biden administration is likely to announce its intention to ban menthol cigarettes tomorrow, people familiar with the plan told CBS News. It is unknown if the law would impact menthol and ice flavored e-liquids in vaping products.

    Such a move would have considerable impact on the tobacco industry, however, because menthol cigarettes account for roughly one-third of the U.S. cigarette market. Approximately 20 million Americans smoke menthols, according to the Food and Drug Administration.

    Mentholated cigarettes have been marketed in the U.S. since the 1920s. Critics want to see them banned because they believe that, by masking the harshness of tobacco smoke, menthol makes it easier to start smoking and harder to quit. While overall smoking has trended downward in recent years, menthol declines have dragged behind other products. The tobacco industry insists that menthol cigarettes are no more harmful to health than nonmenthol cigarettes.

    Cigarette manufacturers have also come under fire for marketing menthol cigarettes disproportionately to Black Americans, highlighting racial inequities. More than 85 percent of Black smokers report using menthol products, as do more than half of all youth who smoke, according to government data.

    The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the FDA to regulate cigarette ingredients. The agency duly banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes. However, it exempted mentholated cigarettes, citing concerns about illicit sales, among other considerations.

    In 2011, the FDA’s Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee concluded that “removal of menthol cigarettes from the marketplace would benefit public health in the United States,” but the additive remained on the market. In early 2020, the Trump administration again gave menthol a pass when it banned characterizing flavors in vapor products.

    While the U.S. wavered, other jurisdictions charged ahead. Brazil outlawed menthol along with all flavored cigarettes in 2012, followed by Turkey in 2015 and the European Union and the United Kingdom in 2020.

    Tired of what they perceived as FDA foot-dragging, anti-smoking and racial justice groups sued the agency. The judge in the case instructed the FDA to respond to this citizens’ petition by April 29.

    There is no factual basis to assert that a menthol cigarette ban will stop people of color from smoking.

    Advocates of the ban say the decision about whether to move ahead is ultimately President Biden’s. Banning menthol cigarettes has Democratic support in Congress too. Senator Dick Durbin, Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi and Representative Bobby Rush recently argued that the FDA has a “duty” to ban menthols. “These failures to protect children, particularly African American children, from a path to addiction are inexcusable,” they told the administration. 

    If enacted, a ban would not take effect overnight. Industry analysts expect the implementation of any plan to remove menthol cigarettes from the U.S. market to take years.  The FDA, which does not yet have a permanent commissioner in place, would have to go through a lengthy rulemaking process, consider potential consequences, such as illegal sales and racial injustice, and solicit public input.

    “In essence, such an announcement would simply be a way to tell the public, as well as the tobacco industry, that the agency intends to ban the flavoring in cigarettes,” Pebbles Fagan, the director of the Center for the Study of Tobacco at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, told NBC News. “The rulemaking process would likely take several years to finalize and implement. That would provide time to boost smoking cessation programs targeting menthol smokers.”

    The American Civil Liberties Union and dozens of other criminal justice groups warned the White House and Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra that a ban on menthol cigarettes would have “serious racial justice implications.” 

    The National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA), representing more than 200 African American-owned community newspapers from around the United States, and leading Black and Hispanic law enforcement executives, too, have urged the FDA to keep menthol cigarettes legal.

    “It is clear that there is no factual basis to assert that a menthol cigarette ban will stop people of color from smoking,” says Benjamin Chavis, president and CEO of the NNPA. “In fact, the unintended consequences of such a racially discriminatory ban will set the stage for more negative and more likely counterproductive interactions between law enforcement and people of color.”

    Supporters of barring menthol products say that a federal ban would focus on retailers selling products and would not criminalize personal use or possession. But critics say that it could be inevitable as a black market grows for illegal cigarettes.

    Biden has pledged to address racial inequities in both criminal justice and healthcare, setting up for what could be an intense balancing act with critics arguing that a ban could increase police brutality and the incarceration of Black Americans.

  • 43 Lawmakers Pen Letter to FDA Supporting Flavor Ban

    43 Lawmakers Pen Letter to FDA Supporting Flavor Ban

    Lawmakers in the US House of representatives have sent a letter to the head of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) urging the agency to pull all flavored e-cigarettes and other vaping products from the market. The 43 House Democrats sent the letter to Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock as the agency continues to review thousands of premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs).

    Credit: Office of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

    “Flavored e-cigarettes are putting a new generation of kids at risk of nicotine addiction and the serious health harms that result from tobacco use,” states the letter drafted by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), according to The Hill.

    The lawmakers want the FDA to ban all flavored e-cigarettes upon further review and nix the exemption the FDA has for menthol and disposable products.

    Along with a ban on flavored e-cigarettes, lawmakers want a ban on premarket tobacco applications and the marketing of e-cigarettes that target minors. “Today, e-cigarette use by youth remains at what FDA calls ‘epidemic proportions’ and e-cigarettes have been the most commonly used tobacco products among youth since 2014 – and flavors are a key reason why,” the letter states.

    The FDA has already put a ban on fruity e-cigarettes, however, brands such as Puff Bar are sidestepping the ban by selling fruit-flavored disposable vaporizers that use synthetic (tobacco-free) nicotine. “We strongly recommend that FDA’s premarket review process require manufacturers to provide convincing evidence that their products do not increase youth use of nicotine and tobacco in ways that increase the risk of abuse and addiction among youth,” the lawmakers stated.

  • P.E.I. Lawmaker: Flavor Ban Could Boost Cigarette Sales

    P.E.I. Lawmaker: Flavor Ban Could Boost Cigarette Sales

    A Green MLA on Canada’s Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.) who voted in favor of a private member’s bill to restrict the sale of flavored vaping products now says he believes vaping could be an important tool to get Islanders to quit smoking.

    During question period on March 4, Green MLA Steve Howard said there is evidence that vaping could be considered a form of “harm reduction” for Islanders attempting to give up smoking. Smoking is often described by health officials as one of the leading causes of preventable deaths on P.E.I., according to a story in the Journal Pioneer.

    Steve Howard
    Steve Howard / Credit: cbc.ca

    Howard suggested that a bill that came into effect at the beginning of March, which banned flavored vaping products, would encourage youth to seek out flavored products on the black market.

    The bill, introduced by Progressive Conservative backbencher Cory Deagle in 2019, also increased the legal age for tobacco and vaping products from 19 to 21 and limited the sale of vaping products to tobacco shops. The bill did not restrict the sale of tobacco products to tobacco shops. It passed unanimously in fall 2019.

    “Many of the severe vaping illnesses we saw last year and in 2019 were linked to black market products. These black market products most often appear and become commercially viable when governments introduced wide-ranging restrictions on legal products,” Howard said.

    “Are you concerned your regulatory approach will increase the availability and use of dangerous black market products?” Howard asked Minister of Finance Darlene Compton.

    The question drew a rebuke from Compton. “I would suggest the Opposition pick a lane – pick any lane – and they’re all paved,” Compton said. “You do not want regulated gambling but you’re happy with regulated cannabis and you’re happy with regulated liquor. And now, you want regulated vaping or you want people to use unregulated vaping. I mean, pick a lane.”

    In an interview, Howard said he had initially voted for the 2019 bill because he agreed it was important to ban flavored vaping products that are marketed to youth, such as cotton candy. But Howard said the regulations put in place ended up banning all flavored products, except those that resembled tobacco products.

    He said this effectively nullified any possibility Islanders could transition to vaping as a means of quitting smoking. “Of course, the best option is to not use vaping or smoking,” Howard said. “But as far as a harm reduction tool goes, vaping is a powerful tool that we should not be discouraging people from using. And the flavors are a key component to uptake.”

    Howard pointed to a posting on the Health Canada website that suggested there is evidence vaping could help with smoking cessation. He said the regulations should be changed to target vaping flavors targeted to youth. But he also suggested schools have a role to play.

    “We don’t have anything in our curriculum in the education system right now to do with vaping. We have tobacco use, we have opiates, we have cannabis, we have alcohol. But we don’t have any education in there on vaping itself,” Howard said.

  • U.S. Senator Romney Calls for Federal Flavor Ban

    U.S. Senator Romney Calls for Federal Flavor Ban

    Utah Sen. Mitt Romney on Thursday pushed for flavored vaping products to be pulled from shelves across the United States. Romney introduced legislation in Sept. 2019 that would have banned the sale of all flavored vape products except tobacco flavors, but it was never taken up for a vote.

    Credit: Office of Mitt Romney

    Romney’s comments during the confirmation hearing for President Joe Biden’s nominee for surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, echo similar statements the senator has made in the past, according to kutv.com.

    “The analysis shows that nearly one fourth of high school kids are vaping on a regular basis — tobacco products — and in many cases marijuana, as well,” Romney said, adding that the government needs to do everything it can to stop the sale of flavored vaping products and implement a robust public education campaign to warn kids about the dangers of vaping.

    In Oct. 2019, the Utah Department of Health issued an emergency order banning the sale of flavored vape products in Utah, which was met swiftly with a lawsuit from tobacco retailers. The products remain available for sale today.

    In 2019, the legal age to purchase tobacco products in the U.S. was raised from 18 to 21.

  • Vermont Revives Bill to Ban Flavored Vape Products

    Vermont Revives Bill to Ban Flavored Vape Products

    The U.S. state of Vermont is once again floating the idea of proposing legislation that seeks to ban the sale of flavored vaping products. Support for the bill is gaining traction in the state’s senate and would also ban flavored combustible tobacco, including menthol cigarettes.Flavored nicotine products

    The ban was originally proposed in early 2020 as a way to prevent youth use, but was sidelined after the Covid-19 pandemic began to impact the country. Ginny Lyons, chair of the Senate Committee on Health and Welfare, said in an interview this week that she’d like the Senate to pass the bill, S.24, “as quickly as possible.” She said use of nicotine products by young people has increased during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to vtdigger.com

    If Vermont approved a ban on flavored e-cigarettes, it would be the third state to do so. Massachusetts banned flavored vapes and tobacco products in 2019, and California followed suit last year. However, California’s law was blocked after the tobacco industry moved successfully to have voters decide on the ban in a statewide referendum next year.

    “During the pandemic, we’ve seen a real fallback from all the progress we’ve made on limiting youth access to tobacco and other flavored products, so it seems more important than ever to move forward with this bill,” Lyons said. “If we were only to eliminate all the other flavors and leave menthol on the market, we would see a transition of people to those menthol products, and we would be backsliding again.”

  • Connecticut’s Largest City Seeking to Ban Flavored Vapes

    Connecticut’s Largest City Seeking to Ban Flavored Vapes

    The beatdown of vapor products goes on as Connecticut’s largest city is now looking to ban flavored vaping and other tobacco products. City lawmakers announced the intent to ban flavors at a press conference last week.

    In addition, state Sen. Marilyn Moore said she will address new legislation before the Connecticut General Assembly’s Public Health Committee, on which she serves, to ban the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes and flavored e-cigarettes.

    If passed, Bridgeport would join more than 100 cities in the nation and two states that have enacted bans on flavored tobacco products, which the group said have been proven to be more attractive to children.

    Earlier this year, Connecticut lawmakers announced they wanted more vapor industry legislation.

  • Lawyer Says Loveland Council Illegally Texted Over Flavor Ban

    Lawyer Says Loveland Council Illegally Texted Over Flavor Ban

    Some Loveland City Council members deliberated on a proposed ban on flavored vaping and other tobacco product sales in private text messages, possibly violating Colorado state law, a Dec. 8 text message thread shows.

    person using phone
    Credit: Pixabay

    Steve Zansberg, a Denver attorney and president of the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition, called the thread an “extremely clear-cut” violation of state rules.

    The Loveland Reporter-Herald obtained the messages from Mayor Jacki Marsh after the paper received a confidential tip. All nine council members and City Manager Steve Adams were included in the thread, though not all council members participated.

    Time stamps on the text thread show that 13 of the messages were exchanged by councilors during their regular meeting that evening, which was held virtually and dealt mostly with the proposed ban and the problem of youth vaping.

    In the text conversation, council members Kathi Wright, Steve Olson, Don Overcash and John Fogle deliberated on how they would respond to calls for a ban on selling the products.

    “Looks like another special meeting this month,” Wright said at 9:17 p.m., reviving a thread that Adams began earlier in the day to let councilors know about a scheduling change.

    “yup. but don’t cave,” Overcash replied.

    After Olson asked whether Wright was interested in “working with business to find a win win solution,” Wright said she “still believe(d) we have another step, talking with local business.”

  • California Flavor Ban on Hold, Voters to Decide in 2022

    California Flavor Ban on Hold, Voters to Decide in 2022

    Californians will decide next year if flavored vaping products should be banned. The California Secretary of State’s office certified a referendum challenging the state’s ban on flavored vapor and other tobacco product sales had garnered more than the minimum number of valid signatures. The referendum will head to the ballot in November, 2022.

    lady vaping
    Credit: Elsa Olofsson

    The ban is on hold and retailers can continue selling flavored e-liquids and other products until votes are cast. The ban had been set to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2021, but was delayed until the signature verification process had been completed. I

    n order to qualify for the ballot, organizers of the referendum submitted more than 1 million signatures, as they needed to get 623,212 verified signatures from California voters. On Friday, the Secretary of State’s office published a report indicating that organizers had gathered 781,885 valid signatures.

    Had the minimum number of valid signatures not been met, the law would have taken effect once the Secretary of State had verified the process was complete. The election is scheduled for Nov. 8, 2022, and those results will then need to be certified. If the law banning flavors is approved, it would go into effect on Dec. 8, 2022.

    It did not make it illegal to possess or use such products, however. In addition to the referendum, the state has also been sued over the ban by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., American Snuff Co. LLC, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., John Middleton Co., U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. LLC, Helix Innovations LLC, Neighborhood Market Association Inc. and Morija LLC, which does business under the name Vapin’ the 619. That litigation is currently ongoing.

  • Montana Legislator Aims to Change Flavor Ban Rules

    Montana Legislator Aims to Change Flavor Ban Rules

    A House bill heard a Montana state house legislative committee last week would limit local control on alternative nicotine and vapor products, retroactively canceling the City of Missoula’s flavored vape ban passed by the Missoula City Council last November.

    House Bill 137, sponsored by Rep. Ron Marshall, R-Hamilton, aims to amend the State of Montana’s Youth Access to Tobacco Act by clarifying that alternative nicotine products are separate from tobacco products, according to a story on kpax.com

    It would also prevent and stop any regulation on nicotine and vapor products by local governments, health boards and the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services – an agency that attempted to eliminate the sale of flavored e-cigarettes last summer.

    “It needs to be addressed,” said Marshall, who was part of a trade association who unsuccessfully sued over former Gov. Steve Bullock’s 120-day flavored e-cigarettes ban as co-owner of Freedom Vapes in Belgrade, Bozeman and Hamilton.

    “There’s a lot of holes, and 56 counties in Montana means 56 different sets of rules. Everything should go through the legislative body when it comes to law. It’s just one of those things where everybody needs to be on the same page, and we need to have a clear definition of what these products are.”

    Marshall said that HB 137 has been coming for a long time, and with COVID-19, laws restricting alternative nicotine products cause substantial damage to a retailer’s revenue earnings.

    “Right now, with the climate out there with COVID and lost jobs and businesses and all that, coming up with another attempt to shut down more business or curtail more business is the wrong answer,” Marshall said. “You’re not only doing that, but you’re also taking away revenue. And that’s revenue that not only goes to the cities and counties, but to the state. Let’s back up and look at the big picture.”

    When the Missoula City Council was discussing its flavored vape ban, City Attorney Jim Nugent said it would likely face a lawsuit as it was written at the time. Council members made changes to the ordinance to strengthen it against any legal challenge.

    The city’s flavored vape ban will go into effect on Jan. 25, and Missoula County may use its extraterritorial powers to extend the ordinance five miles beyond city limits.

    Nugent said the city hasn’t faced a lawsuit regarding the ordinance, and with the final section of HB 137 stating that the bill would apply retroactively, the city likely won’t face a lawsuit. Nugent said the retroactive portion of the bill is aimed at Missoula.

    “Instead of a lawsuit, it is now being challenged through the Legislature,” Nugent said.

    Councilmember Gwen Jones, one of the five sponsors of the ordinance, said in a statement to the Missoula Current that she hopes the legislature lets the ordinance stand.

  • Massachusetts Flavor Ban Boosting Neighbor State Sales

    Massachusetts Flavor Ban Boosting Neighbor State Sales

    A tobacco flavor ban that includes vaping products has cost the state of Massachusetts nearly $75 billion in taxes. According to a study by the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association (NECSEMA), excise tax lost income in Massachusetts from selling fewer menthol cigarettes alone amounted to $62 million in the first six months of the ban. No specific figures were given for electronic nicotine delivery systems in the release.

    man vaping
    Credit: Ruben Bagues

    That loss also simply transferred to Massachusetts’ neighboring states. Cigarettes excise tax stamp sales dropped 23.9 percent in Massachusetts while New Hampshire gained $28,574,340 or 29.7 percent. Rhode Island gained $12,100,000 or 18.2 percent in excise taxes.

    The estimated Massachusetts loss including the sales tax is $73,008,000 while Rhode Island saw a gain of $14,066,740.

    “With every month that passes, the state’s ban on flavored tobacco becomes increasingly absurd,” said Jonathan Shaer, executive director of NECSEMA. “All anyone needs to do is look at the excise tax stamp numbers from June through November to understand how ineffective and ridiculous this ban is. Rhode Island and New Hampshire have combined to sell 18.9 million more stamps than they did over the same period in 2019 while Massachusetts has sold 17.7 million fewer. Indisputably, menthol cigarettes are purchased in neighboring states and then brought back into Massachusetts for personal consumption or illicit market sales.”

    NECSEMA opposed the flavored tobacco ban in 2019 when it was first presented, and continues to monitor sales data to demonstrate the failure of the law and the wrongful impact to its members. The association represents both chain and independent convenience store owners, including many in urban communities that NECSEMA states are being disproportionately affected by the flavor ban ban.

    According to the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), there are 3,360 convenience stores in Massachusetts with 54,000-plus employees accounting for $17 billion in sales annually. Over 89 percent of legal cigarette sales occurring at convenience stores.

    “I challenge anyone to demonstrate how this ban has been effective,” Shaer said. “New Hampshire and Rhode Island imports have replaced sales once made in Massachusetts by licensed retailers. In fact, the latest data shows an uptick in cigarette sales when you combine the increases for non-flavored cigarettes in Massachusetts with total cigarette sales gains in New Hampshire and Rhode Island. Massachusetts small businesses have lost, the Massachusetts budget has lost, public health has lost, and youth who this law was allegedly intended to protect have lost since prevention revenue has greatly diminished.”