Category: Intellectual Property

  • Altria, Njoy Disagree With ITC Determination

    Altria, Njoy Disagree With ITC Determination

    VV Archives

    Altria Group, and its operating company, Njoy, disagree with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) initial determination regarding Juul Labs’ patent infringement complaint against NJOY.

    Last week, the ALJ provided notice of their initial determination supporting Juul Lab’s allegations in its complaint and recommending an exclusion order prohibiting the importation of Njoy ACE into the United States.

    “Altria and NJOY respectfully disagree with the ALJ’s initial determination, and NJOY looks forward to presenting its position to the full ITC, which is expected to issue a final decision by December 23, 2024,” a press release states.

    In August 2023, Njoy filed a similar, independent patent infringement complaint against Juul Labs with the ITC seeking a ban on importing and selling JUUL products in the United States. A hearing before the ALJ was held in June 2024, and an initial determination is expected in late September. A positive outcome in this case would not preclude an exclusion order against ACE from taking effect.

    “We continue to work to bring this issue to resolution. The parties have engaged with a mediator to attempt to negotiate a resolution of these disputes,” the release states. “In addition, Njoy recently filed Substantial Equivalence (SE) Exemption requests with the FDA to allow Njoy to market an already-developed ACE product with minor modifications that we believe avoid three of the four [Juul Labs] patent claims at issue in the case.”

    ACE is the first pod-based vaping product and the only pod-based menthol vaping product authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as appropriate for the protection of public health. “An exclusion order banning the importation of ACE  would severely limit FDA-authorized choices for adults and undermine public health,” the release states.

  • ITC Recommends Ban on U.S. Imports of Njoy Ace 

    ITC Recommends Ban on U.S. Imports of Njoy Ace 

    Photo: JHVEPhoto

    An administrative law judge (AJL) of the International Trade Commission (ITC) has recommended a ban on importing Njoy Ace products into the United States following a patent-infringement claim filed by Juul Labs.

    Ace is the first pod-based vapor product and the only pod-based menthol vapor product authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as appropriate for the protection of public health. According to Njoy parent company Altria Group, an exclusion order banning the importation of Ace would severely limit FDA-authorized choices for adults and undermine public health.

    “Altria and NJOY respectfully disagree with the ALJ’s initial determination, and Njoy looks forward to presenting its position to the full ITC, which is expected to issue a final decision by December 23, 2024,” Altria Group wrote in a statement.

    In August 2023, Njoy filed a similar, independent patent infringement complaint against Juul with the ITC seeking a ban on the importation and sale of Juul products in the U.S. A hearing before the ALJ was held in June 2024, and an initial determination is expected in late September. A positive outcome in this case would not preclude an exclusion order against Njoy Ace from taking effect.

    “We continue to work to bring this issue to resolution,” Altria wrote in its statement. “The parties have engaged with a mediator to attempt to negotiate a resolution of these disputes. In addition, Njoy recently filed substantial equivalence (SE) exemption requests with the FDA to allow Njoy to market an already-developed Ace product with minor modifications that we believe avoid three of the four Juul patent claims at issue in the case.”

  • Former Researcher Sues KT&G Over E-Cig Patents

    Former Researcher Sues KT&G Over E-Cig Patents

    Photo: Ian O’Hanlon

    A former KT&G Corp researcher has filed a lawsuit against his former employer claiming that he was insufficiently compensated for inventing “the world’s first e-cigarette” while working at the firm, reports the Yonhap News Agency.

    Kwak Dae-geun demands KRW2.8 trillion ($2 billion), reportedly the highest amount ever claimed by an individual in a South Korean legal action

    According to the suit, Kwak joined the Korea Ginseng and Tobacco Research Institute in 1991 and began developing a tobacco-heating product in 2005.

     In July that year, he registered his first patent for a prototype. In December 2006, he registered another patent for an upgraded version with a controllable heater.

    Subsequently, he developed a full e-cigarette set, and registered a patent for part of the device in 2007 before leaving the company in 2010 as part of corporate restructuring.

    After Kwak’s departure, KT&G allegedly registered patents for some of his technologies without recognizing his contributions.

    In addition to his claim about compensation, Kwak contends that a prominent rival global tobacco firm was able to commercialize its internal heating-based e-cigarette model in South Korea in 2017 due to the absence of overseas patents.

    Kwak’s requested damages reflects his portion of the revenue KT&G is expected to generate through Kwak’s patented technology during the 20-year patent term, as well as what KT&G would have earned if it had registered patents overseas.

    KT&G counters that it has properly rewarded Kwan in the form of offering a technology advisory deal, and that Kwak had agreed not to raise any legal issues.

    The firm also said the technologies invented by Kwak are not currently used in the products it is selling.

    The e-cigarettes being sold by the global firm in question, meanwhile, did not involve technologies patented by Kwak, according to KT&G, which also noted that the rival firm had already commercialized early-model heated tobacco-type products in 1998.

  • U.S. Trade Commission to Probe ALD and Stiizy

    U.S. Trade Commission to Probe ALD and Stiizy

    Credit: Ascannio

    The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will investigate oil vaporizing devices, components and products manufactured and sold by ALD Group and Stiiizy in response to patent violation complaints filed by Pax Labs.

    Pax Lab has asked the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

    In a note on its website, the ITC stressed that is has not yet made any decision on the merits of Pax Lab’s complaint. The ITC’s chief administrative law judge will now assign the case to one of the ITC’s administrative law judges, who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. That judge will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

    The ITC said it will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the ITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. ITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

  • PMI and BAT Settle Patent Infringement Disputes

    PMI and BAT Settle Patent Infringement Disputes

    Photo: ASDF

    Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco have settled their ongoing intellectual property disputes relating to heated tobacco and vapor products.

    The cigarette makers had been fighting a multi-front patent battle. BAT, which makes Vuse vapes and Glo heated tobacco devices, was ordered to pay PMI millions of dollars after losing one case, while PMI has been blocked from importing its flagship heated tobacco device IQOS into the United States as part of another.

    The settlement includes non-monetary provisions between PMI and BAT that resolve all ongoing global patent infringement litigation, encompassing all related injunctions and exclusion orders, and prevents future claims against current heated tobacco and vapor products. The settlement also allows each party to innovate and introduce product iterations.

    “We are pleased that this matter has been resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both parties,” said PMI CEO Jacek Olczak in a statement. “There is a clear and growing global desire from adults who smoke to choose from a range of smoke-free products, and we believe continued reduced-risk category innovation can accelerate declines in the harms associated with smoking to the benefit of consumers and public health at large as we continue PMI’s journey to end the sale of cigarettes.”

    “This agreement is an important step forward for BAT and all our stakeholders,” said BAT CEO Tadeu Marroco in a statement. “Having already built two £1 billion [$1.28 billion] brands in Vuse and Glo, the potential for their continued impact on tobacco harm reduction is clear. I am delighted that this settlement will allow BAT to focus on developing innovative solutions that provide adult consumers with a greater choice of reduced risk products in support of our ‘A Better Tomorrow’ purpose. By doing so, we will help build a smokeless world for the benefit of consumers, investors and society as a whole.”

  • Nicotine a Top ‘Intangible’ Sector in Relative Terms

    Nicotine a Top ‘Intangible’ Sector in Relative Terms

    Photo: Smoore

    The tobacco and vaping business is the world’s most “intangible” sector in relative terms, according to the brand valuation consultancy Brand Finance.

    Intangible assets are identifiable, non-monetary assets without physical substance. They can be grouped into three broad categories—rights (including leases, agreements, contracts), relationships (including a trained workforce) and intellectual property (including brands, patents and copyrights).

    According to Brand Finance, intangible assets account for 91 percent of the tobacco and vaping sector’s total enterprise value—a condition that the consultancy attributes to tobacco and e-cigarette companies’ heavy investments in proprietary vaping-related technology and patented intellectual property. The China National Tobacco Corp., BAT and Philip Morris, for example, have each accumulated significant disclosed intangibles and goodwill due to large acquisitions.

    “While tobacco products are increasingly regulated in developed markets, e-cigarettes are at nascent stage and currently proving to generate high intangible value thanks in part due to lack of regulation of marketing these products in some jurisdictions,” Brand Finance writes in its report.

    Remarkably, the tobacco and vaping business was the second-largest contributor (after semiconductors) to the performance in the rankings of Japan, which saw the value of its intangible assets jump by $587 billion this year.

    “Our research aims to demonstrate the continued growing importance of intangible assets like strong brands and innovative technology in driving productivity and growth potential,” said Annie Brown, general manager at Brand Finance UK, in a statement. “Companies that strategically deploy their intangible assets have the ability to significantly outperform their competitors.”

  • Altria Seeks U.S. Importation Ban of Juul Products

    Altria Seeks U.S. Importation Ban of Juul Products

    Image: inimalGraphic

    Njoy has asked the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to ban on the importation and sale of certain Juul products, including its currently marketed Juul device and Juul pods, citing patent infringements.  

    “Protecting our intellectual property is critical to achieving our vision,” said Murray Garnick, executive vice president and general counsel of Njoy parent company Altria Group, in a statement. “Juul has infringed upon our patents through the sale of its imported products, and we ask the ITC to impose appropriate remedies in response to these trade violations.”

    Njoy has also filed a complaint against Juul in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware based on the same patent infringement. Njoy Ace is currently the only pod-based e-vapor product to have received marketing authorization from the FDA, which deemed the marketing of the ACE device and three ACE tobacco-flavored pods as “appropriate for the protection of public health.”

    Njoy’s ITC complaint against Juul alleges trade violations associated with the sale of imported products that, according to Njoy, infringe U.S. Patent No. 11,497,864 and U.S. Patent No. 10,334,881. Njoy acquired the Asserted Patents from Fuma International, concurrently with the settlement of a patent infringement lawsuit filed against the company by Fuma.

    Njoy’s complaint is the latest development in a broader intellectual property dispute.

    In July, Juul Labs asked the ITC to block sales and imports of Njoy Ace, claiming that the product infringes several Juul patents. It has also filed a complaint against Njoy with the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

    Juul Labs complain also targets Altria Group, which agreed to acquire the NJOY in March after exchanging its minority investment in Juul for a heated tobacco product intellectual property license.

  • Kaival Releases Details of GoFire Patents Deal

    Kaival Releases Details of GoFire Patents Deal

    Kaival Brands Innovations Group provided additional details of its recently acquired extensive patent portfolio from GoFire as it looks to expand its current product offerings to explore near-term and long-term revenue opportunities, according to GlobeNewswire.

    In the near term, Kaival Brands expects to seek third-party licensing opportunities in the cannabis, hemp/CBD, nicotine and nutraceutical markets as a means of monetizing its new patents. Longer term, the company believes it can utilize the acquired patents to create innovative and market-disruptive products for its growing base of adult consumers, including patent protected vaporizer devices and related hardware and software applications.

    The consideration for the purchased patents consisted primarily of Kaival Brands equity securities, consisting of common stock, newly designated Series B Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase common stock. Importantly, in certain key aspects, the equity consideration was structured in a forward-looking manner with valuations or exercise prices struck at premiums to the current market price of Kaival Brands’ common stock. The weighted price per share of the common stock issued and the common stock underlying the Series B Preferred Stock was $1.53 per share on the May 30 closing date, accompanied by warrants with exercise prices ranging from $3 and $6.

    Included in the acquired technologies are patented systems and methods that are designed to overcome common issues regarding reliability and consistent dispensing over the entire life of a cartridge or reservoir as well as improvements to the vaporizing chamber to ensure complete vaporization with minimum residue.

    The acquired patent portfolio includes the following: Bluetooth Child Safety App and Mechanical Cartridge Protection; Controlled Delivery; Flavor Delivery and Experience to Last Puff; Leak Proof Design and Removal of Cutting Agents; Authentication System/Counterfeit Protection; Dry Puff Protection; 510 and Pod Compatibility; Product Remaining Indicators; and MHRA Requirements.

    The GoFire patent portfolio includes 12 existing patents and 46 pending applications with novel technologies across extrusion dose control, product preservation, tracking and tracing usage, multiple modalities (i.e., different methods of vaporizing) and child safety. The patents and patent applications cover territories including the United States, Australia, Canada, China, the EPO (European Patent Organization), Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand and South Korea. The portfolio also includes a proprietary mobile device software application that is used in conjunction with certain patents in the portfolio.

    The acquired assets are housed in Kaival Labs, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kaival Brands, which develops new branded and white label products and services in the vaporizer and inhalation technology sectors.

  • High Court Rejects Challenge to PMI Heating Patents

    High Court Rejects Challenge to PMI Heating Patents

    Image: nimalGraphic

    The High Court of Justice in London ruled April 17 that Philip Morris Products’ (PMP) patents protecting a tobacco-heating technology are valid, reports Law360. The ruling represents a defeat for BAT and its Nicoventures subsidiary, which had sought to revoke PMP’s patents.

    While considering the patent valid, the court also said that BAT’s Glo heated-tobacco products did not infringe the patents, heading off an infringement counterclaim filed by PMP.

    The April 17 ruling is the latest chapter in an ongoing intellectual property dispute between the tobacco giants.

    PMP initially sued BAT and Nicoventures, claiming they infringed several of its tobacco-heating technology patents. This prompted BAT and Nicoventures to file counterclaims seeking to invalidate the patents.

    The proceedings have now branched off into several different actions before the High Court.

    In the current case, Nicoventures argued, among other things, that the PMP technology was obvious in light of a 1998 patent application referred to as “Pienemann,” which covers a “system for providing an inhalable aerosol.”

    While Pienemann, like PMP’s technology, has multiple heating elements, Judge Michael Tappin said that a skilled team would consider the multiple heaters to “mimic” one heater. Pienemann also did not specify the inclusion of a thin-film heater as seen in the PMP patent, instead describing a “graphite loaded sheath,” according to the judgment.

    Regarding the infringement claim, Tappin said that BAT’s Glo products did not infringe the patents because they did not include a method of allowing different parts of the heating system to be heated at different times.

  • Altria Exchanges Juul Stake for Heated Tobacco IP License

    Altria Exchanges Juul Stake for Heated Tobacco IP License

    Photo: Juul Labs

    Altria Group has exchanged its entire investment in Juul Labs for a non-exclusive, irrevocable global license to certain of Juul’s heated tobacco intellectual property.

    “We believe exchanging our Juul ownership for intellectual property rights is the appropriate path forward for our business,” said Altria CEO Billy Gifford in a statement. “Juul faces significant regulatory and legal challenges and uncertainties, many of which could exist for many years. We are continuing to explore all options for how we can best compete in the e-vapor category.”

    As of Dec. 31, 2022, the carrying value and estimated fair value of Altria’s Juul investment was $250 million. Altria will record the financial impact of the agreement in the first quarter of 2023 and intends to treat any such amounts as a special item and exclude it from its adjusted diluted earnings per share.

    “The return of Altria’s equity stake and termination of underlying agreements affords us full strategic freedom—we are no longer limited by the terms of those agreements to pursue other strategic opportunities and partnerships,” wrote Juul in a statement. “We are free to take advantage of a range of options to maximize the value of our company while we continue to advance our leading product technology and innovation pipeline.”

    In late 2018, Altria paid nearly $13 billion for a 35 percent stake in Juul. “We have long said that providing adult smokers with superior, satisfying products with the potential to reduce harm is the best way to achieve tobacco harm reduction,” said Altria’s then-CEO Howard Willard at the time. “Through Juul, we are making the biggest investment in our history toward that goal. We strongly believe that working with Juul to accelerate its mission will have long-term benefits for adult smokers and our shareholders.”

    Over the years that followed, however, regulatory scrutiny and litigation relating to Juul’s marketing practices severely eroded Juul’s valuation. On June 23, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered Juul Labs to pull its e-cigarettes from U.S. store shelves, saying the e-cigarette manufacturer had submitted insufficient evidence that they were “appropriate for the protection of the public health.” After Juul challenged the marketing denial order (MDO), the FDA agreed to take another look at the company’s pre-market tobacco product application.

    The agency said it had determined that there are scientific issues unique to the Juul application that warrant additional review. 

    In early September, Juul Labs agreed to pay nearly $440 million to settle a two-year investigation by 33 U.S. states into the marketing of its vaping products, which critics have blamed for sparking a surge in underage vaping.

    On Sept. 30, Altria announced it was ending its noncompete agreement with Juul. The tobacco giant is reportedly in talks to buy Njoy Holdings for at least $2.75 billion. Njoy has a roughly 2 percent of the U.S. vape market by volume, according to Jefferies. Juul, by contrast, accounts for around a quarter of American vapor product sales. Unlike Juul, however, Njoy has FDA permission to sell its products in the U.S.

    “While our appeal of FDA’s now-stayed MDO remains pending, we remain as confident in our science and evidence to support the continued marketing of Juul products,” Juul wrote after Altria announced the exchange of its investment for a license. “We also continue to pursue future applications for new products to accelerate our mission and progress for the adult smoker, public health, and an end to combustible cigarettes.”