Category: Regulation

  • CMSA Files Amicus Brief With SCOTUS in Triton Case

    CMSA Files Amicus Brief With SCOTUS in Triton Case

    This week, the Coalition of Manufacturers of Smoking Alternatives (CMSA), a trade coalition that represents a diverse array of members who manufacture and distribute smoking harm reduction products, filed an amicus curiae brief before the Supreme Court of the United States supporting White Lion Investments, dba as Triton Distribution, in its case against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    In its brief, CMSA argues that FDA violated the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA) in its wholesale rejection of applications for flavored vaping products by applying a surprise and improperly adopted standard and foregoing the required notice-and-comment process. The brief emphasizes that the U.S. Congress specifically requires the FDA to undergo a transparent rulemaking process before imposing any restriction that amounts to a “tobacco product” standard.

    “Importantly, this process tasks FDA with considering the broader public health effects of any such standard, ‘such as creating demand for and increasing the use of unregulated black-market products,’ or other harmful consequences,” the CMSA states. “In its efforts to unilaterally reject flavored vapor product applications based on a new and heightened standard, FDA unlawfully sidestepped this critical regulatory check and operated outside the bounds of its authority.”

    The CMSA states that the FDA circumvented the very procedures Congress imposed to check the arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of such delegated power, and causes real harms as the FDA “misleads and whipsaws” manufacturers seeking to provide a robust set of options for consumers seeking to quit smoking,” the CMSA wrote in its brief. Further adding that “the long delays in FDA’s review of the many PMTAs (premarket tobacco product applications) it has received, coupled with the moving goal posts imposed via the review process, creates a level of uncertainty that severely deters investment and innovation in new products with harm-reduction potential.”

    Earlier this week, 13 members of Congress, including U.S. Senator Roger Marshall and U.S. Representative Andy Harris, filed an amicus brief supporting the position of Triton Distribution and CMSA. In their brief, the members of Congress write, “There is a clear lack of authority for such a ban. Congress has specifically prohibited the FDA from banning products. Despite this, the FDA imposed a categorical prohibition.”

    Also, the Global Action to End Smoking wrote in its amicus brief to SCOTUS that the FDA strayed from a “sensible, science-based harm-reduction approach, adopting an all-or-nothing stance that exalts outright cessation and all but ignores the harm-reduction strategy that Congress mandated…. [ignoring the] overwhelming scientific evidence that e-cigarettes containing flavor additives have an important role to play in moving adult smokers down the continuum of risk.”

    SCOTUS announced Dec. 2, 2024 as the date for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, d/b/a Triton Distribution hearing.

    Credit: Renas Child
  • Maldives Readies to Ban Vaping Products

    Maldives Readies to Ban Vaping Products

    Photo: siraphol

    Maldives will ban e-cigarettes and related products, reports The Edition, citing an announcement by President Mohamed Muizzu on X. Lawmakers will receive proposed amendments to the island nation’s legislation this week.

    According to the post, Maldives will outlaw import of all vape products and parts of vape devices is to from Nov. 15, 2024. Additionally, the use, possession, production, sale, advertisement and distribution of all vape products will become illegal from Dec.15, 2024.

     This decision follows numerous requests from concerned parents, health service providers and groups such as NDC Alliance and the Doctors Association and Nurses Association.

     According to figures shared with Mihaaru News by Maldives Customs Service, local businesses imported vapes worth MVR124.34 million 2018 and July of this year.

    Currently, some 50 countries ban vapes, including at least five countries in Asia.

  • Jamaica to Pass New Rules for Vape Products

    Jamaica to Pass New Rules for Vape Products

    Credit: Daniel

    Jamaica has supported an updated strategy to accelerate action to meet Tobacco Control targets in the Region of the Americas.

    “Jamaica wishes to reconfirm our unwavering commitment to achieving these targets and thanks PAHO for their continued leadership and technical support in advancing tobacco control in Jamaica,” noted Minister of Health & Wellness, Christopher Tufton, addressing the 61st Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) Directing Council in Washington DC where the updated strategy was presented.

    The Minister is leading the Jamaica delegation, including Chief Medical Officer Jacqueline Bisasor-McKenzie, to the meeting.

    “We are concerned about the slow progress of member states in making environments completely smoke-free, which requires further assessment to close this gap. Of significant concern to Jamaica is the use of e-cigarettes and vaping among children, adolescents, and young adults, along with the general use of cannabis and the proliferation of hookah bars. The regulation of e-cigarettes is a significant step that will address this concern,” Tufton noted.

    At the same time, he said it will be necessary to have an accompanying public education campaign, “especially to debunk the myths around e-cigarettes and the use of hookahs, that they are safe alternatives to smoking and not harmful to health”.

    “We should also ensure that the Tobacco Control response is integrated into the NCD response,” the Minister said, according to Jamaica’s Ministry of Health and Wellness.

    Jamaica is also promulgating new legislation that will regulate Government officials’ interactions with the tobacco industry, test and measure tobacco products’ contents and emissions, and promote communication and public awareness of tobacco control issues and the health risks of tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke.

    Also covered, the Minister said, is “full and mandatory prohibition on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, including a ban on point-of-sale tobacco displays, and increasing the size of the graphic health warning from 60 to 80 percent of the principal display areas of tobacco products”.

  • Supreme Court to Hear Avail, Reynolds ‘Venue’ Case

    Supreme Court to Hear Avail, Reynolds ‘Venue’ Case

    The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to consider another case involving federal approval of vapes at the request of the Biden administration on Friday.

    The case arose after the FDA denied R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company’s request to introduce three flavored vapes on the market. The FDA said the company failed to meet federal requirements concerning tobacco products’ marketing, but the company contends the decision was arbitrary and capricious.

    Reynolds is based in North Carolina, and the federal appeals courts located there and in D.C. already had precedent on the books unfavorable to the manufacturer.

    Under federal law, companies can challenge the U.S. Food and Drug Administration denying of a marketing order for a new tobacco product in Washington, D.C., or where the company’s principal place of business is located, reports The Hill.

    The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has been more sympathetic to the industry, making it an attractive place for companies to contest their products being denied.

    The 5th Circuit’s rule effectively enables it to host any tobacco company’s challenge, so long as its lawsuit is joined by a convenience store or other retail seller within the 5th Circuit’s borders — which spans Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

    The companies instead filed its challenge in the 5th Circuit alongside Avail Vapor Texas and the Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association. The federal government attempted to move venues, but the 5th Circuit said the additional challengers meant the case was properly brought.

    No matter which way the justices rule, they are not expected to address the merits of the FDA’s denial. The Supreme Court only took up the question of whether the 5th Circuit was a proper venue.

    “There is no circuit conflict over the meaning of this venue provision. And other vehicle problems abound,” the company wrote in court filings urging the justices to turn away the appeal.

    The U.S. Supreme Court agreed in July to hear the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s defense of the agency’s rejection of two companies’ premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) to sell flavored vape products that it has determined pose health risks for young consumers.

    The justices took up the FDA’s appeal filed after a lower court ruled that the agency had failed to follow proper legal procedures under federal law when it denied the applications to bring their nicotine-containing products to market.

  • England to Ban Vaping Outside Schools, Hospitals

    England to Ban Vaping Outside Schools, Hospitals

    Credit: Fusion Art

    Ministers in England are reportedly planning to ban vaping in playgrounds, hospital grounds and near schools in an attempt to prevent children from taking up the nicotine products.

    Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is considering restricting the use of e-cigarettes outdoors in England. Chris Whitty, the country’s chief medical officer, is said to favor the move, according to media reports.

    Vaping restrictions will be included in the tobacco and vapes bill, which is due to be presented to parliament in the coming weeks. Whitty is understood to have argued for including pub gardens in the ban, but the Times reported that no final decision has been made.

    Ministers are not expected to include outdoor hospitality after the backlash in August over proposals to ban smoking in pub gardens to reduce the number of preventable deaths linked to tobacco use.

  • Regulations Decimate Philippine Vape Sector

    Regulations Decimate Philippine Vape Sector

    Image: freshidea

    Onerous government regulations have forced about one-fifth of Philippine vaping companies out of business, according to Philippine E-Cigarette Industry Association President Joey Dulay. Importers, he added, have found it easier to comply than their domestic counterparts.

    “But we are pushing them to try and comply,” Dulay was quoted as saying by Business World.

    Under the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act, manufacturers or importers must register their products and secure licenses to operate.

    They are also required to adhere to packaging standards and pay duties and taxes.

    Manufacturers, distributors and importers were given an 18-month transition period to comply with the regulations laid down in the vape law.

    Dulay noted that many vape brands and manufacturers have yet to secure their Philippine standard quality and/or safety mark and import commodity clearance sticker.

    By the end of August, the Bureau of Customs had confiscated PHP6.5 billion ($115.21 million) worth of illegal vape products, mostly from China.

    The government is estimated to miss around PHP5 billion yearly from illicit vape products.

  • FDA Clears RespiRx IND Inhaler Application

    FDA Clears RespiRx IND Inhaler Application

    Image: Qnovia

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for Qnovia’s RespiRx nicotine inhaler (QN-01).

    According to Qnovia, the RespiRx is the first truly inhalable nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to assist smokers attempting to quit smoking.

    The company will initiate a Phase 1, randomized, crossover, open-label trial to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability following self-administration of nicotine-containing products in up to 24 healthy adult subjects who currently smoke combustible cigarettes.

    “The FDA clearance of our IND application for QN-01 marks a significant achievement for Qnovia as we transition to a clinical-stage therapeutics company,” said Qnovia CEO Brian Quigley in a statement.

    “Our U.S. clinical development plan is derisked by the positive first-in-human data we generated last year in support of advancing QN-01 in the United Kingdom where we demonstrated pulmonary delivery and a superior pharmacokinetic profile for the RespiRx when compared to existing nicotine replacement therapies,”

    “The next step for our U.S. program is to initiate a randomized Phase 1 trial that evaluates QN-01 compared to the Nicotrol Inhaler and combustible cigarettes in a head-to-head comparison. We remain on track to dose our first patient in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in parallel will be advancing to a pivotal clinical trial in the U.K. to support an MAA submission [Marketing Authorization Application] to the MHRA [ Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] in 2026.”

    Qnovia’s proprietary drug/device combination already demonstrated dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, pulmonary delivery and was well tolerated in a first-in-human study conducted to support advancing QN-01 in the U.K., according to the company.

    “There have been no treatment options for smoking cessation approved in the U.S. in over 20 years. As a result, attempting to quit ‘cold turkey’ remains the most popular method of quitting smoking,” said Mitch Zeller, Qnovia’s policy and regulatory strategy advisor.

    “There is an extraordinary public health need for truly innovative products to help health-concerned smokers stop using cigarettes. Any effort to reduce the death and disease caused by tobacco use must include new and better tools in the treatment toolkit,” Zeller added.

  • Penalties for U.S. Retailers Selling Illegal Vapes

    Penalties for U.S. Retailers Selling Illegal Vapes

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is seeking fines against two brick-and-mortar retailers and nine online retailers. The FDA previously issued warning letters to these retailers for their sale of unauthorized tobacco products, however, follow-up inspections revealed that the retailers had failed to correct the violations. Accordingly, the agency is now seeking a civil money penalty of $20,678 from each retailer.

    To date, the FDA has filed civil money penalty complaints against 70 manufacturers and 160 retailers for distribution and/or sale of unauthorized tobacco products. These actions reflect the FDA’s continued dedication to bringing enforcement actions against entities along the supply chain who violate the law relating to tobacco products.

    The FDA has currently authorized 34 e-cigarette products and devices. The agency maintains a printable one-page flyer of all authorized e-cigarette products that retailers can easily consult to determine which products may be lawfully marketed and sold in the United States. Entities manufacturing, importing, selling or distributing e-cigarettes that lack the required premarket authorization risk enforcement actions.

     

  • Leaked Draft: EU Wants to Ban Outdoor Vaping

    Leaked Draft: EU Wants to Ban Outdoor Vaping

    The European Commission will propose extending smoking bans to outdoor areas, such as cafe terraces, bus stops and zoos. The proposal will also include nicotine-free products, according to leaked documents.

    The recommendations include “heated-tobacco products and electronic cigarettes, whether containing nicotine or nicotine-free.” The commission also wants to include “tobacco surrogates and any other smoke and/or aerosol emitting products, according to the documents.

    “The evidence on the use of emerging products as a cessation aid is inconclusive,” the documents said. The recommendations follow growing evidence that secondhand exposure to “aerosols from electronic cigarettes, both with and without nicotine, expose bystanders to quantifiable levels of particulate matter and key toxicants and contaminants.”

    “The level of coverage of smoke-free rules varies greatly based on the type of smoke-free environments, and the general level of coverage of outdoor spaces in smoke-free policies is low,” the commission said.

    The new guidelines would include outdoor or semi-outdoor, meaning partially covered or enclosed spaces like rooftops, balconies, porches and patios, associated with service establishments such as restaurants, bars and cafes. Public transport hubs like bus stops and airports and outdoor areas linked to workplaces, hospitals and nursing homes would also be included. Recreational areas where children are present would also be covered, including public playgrounds, amusement parks, swimming pools and zoos as well as educational premises ranging from preschool childcare to university.

    The new recommendations are expected to be announced Sept. 17.

    The leaked proposal has already received backlash from the World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA). “The commission is making a disastrous mistake by lumping vaping with smoking,” said Michael Landl, director of the WVA. “This sends a dangerous message to millions of smokers who need vaping to quit. This falsely equates vaping with smoking, misleading millions into believing vaping is just as harmful when it’s actually 95 percent less harmful. There is virtually no secondhand vaping, and it is way less harmful than smoking. These recommendations will keep more people smoking and put public health at greater risk by equating vaping with smoking.”

    “The commission is outright misleading smokers by claiming vaping and smoking are the same,” said Alberto Gomez Hernandez, policy manager at the WVA. “This blatant disregard for science and consumer choice ignores the facts. Allowing vaping in smoke-free areas could drive more smokers to switch, cutting smoking deaths across Europe. Instead, they’re blocking a proven harm reduction tool and putting lives at risk.”

  • Rocky River Set to Ban Vaping in Public Parks

    Rocky River Set to Ban Vaping in Public Parks

    Credit: Mahir

    The Rocky River City Council in Ohio could vote today to ban smoking and vaping on city property, including public parks.

    The legislation is set for its third and final reading at Monday’s regular council meeting at City Hall.

    According to media reports, the new law would apply to all publicly owned property in the city, which would include the city’s 10 parks.

    Rocky River’s city policies already bar smoking on all city-owned properties. If public staffers catch someone smoking, they can escort them off the property.

    The proposed ordinance would make it a minor misdemeanor, and violators could be ticketed and/or fined.