Category: Uncategorized

  • Taiwan has e-cig ‘problem’

    Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare reported Sunday new data estimating that more than 52,000 teenagers in Taiwan regularly use electronic cigarettes, according to a story in The Taiwan News citing a Central News Agency report.

    A poll administered by the ministry found that e-cigarette use went from 2.0 percent among middle school students and 2.1 percent among high school students in 2013, to 3.7 percent and 4.8 percent respectively in 2015.

    The ministry estimates also that there are 100,000 adult – over 18-years-old – e-cigarette smokers in Taiwan.

    The ministry was quoted as saying that e-cigarettes were highly addictive and that their long-term effects were not fully understood, something, it added, that posed ‘even more of a risk to young adopters’.

    The story did not explain what the e-cigarette risk was being compared with. Even so, the Ministry was said to be demanding immediate attention to this problem.

    Taiwan legislators continue to discuss how to regulate and manage e-cigarettes, and even ban them; however, legislation remains pending in the Executive Yuan.

  • Smoking frozen out

    An Icelandic doctor has credited vaping with contributing to a dramatic decline in the number of smokers in Iceland, according to a story by Paul Fontaine for grapevine.is.

    Guðmundur Karl Snæbjörnsson described vaping as “a great blessing” for Icelanders’ health.

    In 2014, 14 percent of the population or 35,000 people self-identified as smokers, figures that had fallen to nine percent and 22,000 by 2017.

    The 37 percent drop in the number of smokers was attributable in part to an increase in vaping, Guðmundur told reporters.

    Cigarette sales had dropped by 50 percent from 2008 to 2017, while vaping had been on the rise, and now, about 20,000 Icelanders vaped daily or less frequently.

    “Smoking has been falling like a rock like we’ve never seen before,” Guðmundur was reported to have said. “The biggest contributing factors have been mouth-tobacco and vaping, which have clearly been wiping smoking out.”

    Iceland currently has no clearly defined laws about the contents, sale and distribution of vaping products.

    Although a bill was introduced last year that set limits on e-fluid strength and quantities; that bill was strongly opposed by vape shop owners and ended up dying in committee.

  • Ploom sales expanding

    Ploom sales expanding

    Japan Tobacco Inc. said today that it would expand the sales area of its Ploom TECH starter kit and tobacco capsules in the cities of Sapporo, Sendai, Yokohama, Nagoya, Osaka and Hiroshima from February 5.

    The company said there had been ‘excellent feedback’ on the product from customers since its launch at certain stores in Fukuoka, and via a specialized Ploom online shop in March, 2016. JT launched the product also in the Tokyo metropolitan area from June, 2017, and expanded the sales area in Tokyo from the end of October, 2017.

    The important aspect of the announcement about the expansion of sales, however, has more to do with manufacturing capacity issues, which have been a problem and allowed other companies to move ahead in the rapidly-growing, heat-not-burn segment of the Japanese market.

    Ploom TECH was a tobacco vapor device providing a new way to enjoy tobacco by using an indirect, low-temperature tobacco-heating technology, JT said as part of its announcement. The granulated tobacco in the capsule was heated, but there was no combustion or ‘direct tobacco heating at high temperatures’.

    ‘Ploom TECH allows consumers to enjoy a clear tobacco taste while at the same time significantly decreasing the smoke smell compared to traditional cigarettes,’ the company said.

    Both the starter kit and tobacco capsules are due to be on sale in nearly 150 tobacco stores in six cities – Sapporo, Sendai, Yokohama, Nagoya, Osaka and Hiroshima – from February 5.

  • US equivocates on quitting

    Not one US state funds tobacco prevention programs at levels recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP).

    This is one of the findings contained in a report, Broken Promises to Our Children: A State-by-State Look at the 1998 Tobacco Settlement 19 Years Later. The report was published yesterday by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Americans for Non-smokers’ Rights and the Truth Initiative.

    It finds that the states will collect $27.5 billion this year from the tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes, but will spend less than three percent of that income, $721.6 million, on tobacco prevention programs.e-cigarette

    And the $721.6 million that the states have budgeted for tobacco prevention is a small fraction of the $3.3 billion the CDCP recommends. Not a single state funds tobacco prevention programs at CDCP-recommended levels, and only two states, Alaska and California, provide more than 90 percent of the recommended funding.

    But the report finds that states with ‘well-funded’, sustained tobacco prevention programs have seen remarkable progress. Florida, with one of the longest-running programs, had reduced its high school smoking rate to 5.2 percent, one of the lowest rates ever reported by any state.

    A press note announcing the publication of the report said the US had reduced smoking to record lows of 15.1 percent among adults and 8.0 percent among high school students.

    ‘But tobacco use still kills more than 480,000 Americans and costs the nation about $170 billion in health care bills each year,’ the note said.

    ‘Today’s [Wednesday’s] report also highlights large disparities in who smokes and who suffers from tobacco-related diseases in the United States.

    ‘Smoking rates are especially high in a swath of 12 states in the Midwest and South, an area called “Tobacco Nation” in a recent Truth Initiative report.

    ‘Nationwide, smoking rates are highest among people who live below the poverty level and have less education, American Indians/Alaska Natives, LGBT Americans, those who are uninsured or on Medicaid, and those with mental illness.

    ‘These differences are in large part due to the tobacco industry’s targeting of vulnerable populations through advertising, price discounting and other marketing strategies.

    ‘By funding tobacco prevention and cessation programs at the CDC’s recommended levels, states can reduce tobacco use among all Americans. But most states are falling far short…’

    The report ranks California as the top state for funding programs that prevent children from smoking and help smokers quit, while it put Connecticut and West Virginia, which each budgeted zero state funds this year for tobacco prevention and cessation programs, equal bottom.

  • Blinc partners with ALD and Joinking

    Blinc partners with ALD and Joinking

    The Blinc Group is partnering with ALD Group and Joinking US Group. Their mission is to develop the ALD Amaze brand and expand Joinking’s distribution foot print on the U.S. east coast.

    Established in 2009 in Shenzhen China, ALD Group focuses on traditional e-liquid and cannabis. As an established premium vaporizer manufacturer, ALD has developed a collection of proprietary designs for disposable and open systems that are used by the world’s leading brands.

    “Our partnership with The Blinc Group is yet another proof of ALD’s commitment to excellence and continued innovation in vapor technologies for cannabis products.” said Yoyo Yu, vice president of sales.

    “As a pioneer in vaping technology, ALD is one of the first manufacturers to bring their wealth of experience in vaping technology to the marijuana industry thus allowing for the best possible delivery and customer experience.” says Arnaud Dumas de Rauly, chief strategy officer of The Blinc Group.

  • Above the salt

    Above the salt

    Solace Vapor specializes in tobacco-free nicotine and nicotine salt e-liquids expressly designed for smaller, low-wattage vaporizers.

    By Stephanie Banfield

     

    When it comes to e-liquids, the options available for consumers to purchase are seemingly endless. From online retailers to brick-and-mortar shops, hundreds of manufacturers are vying for the attention of potential consumers and competing for their slice of the proverbial pie. But in a market saturated with products of similar styles and flavors, developing one that differentiates itself from the competition can be a challenge. Enter Solace Vapor, an e-liquid manufacturer that has raised the bar for vapor products with the development of a unique category that gives the company a cutting edge over all its competition.

    A California, USA-based company that specializes in tobacco-free nicotine and nicotine salt products, Solace Vapor was founded in 2016 in a small basement office in downtown Los Angeles by a group of individuals who saw an opportunity to revolutionize the vapor industry.

    “I always saw vaping as the future of the tobacco market, and when forming this company we knew there needed to be a significant evolution from the way things were being executed for the market to develop further,” says Solace Vapor co-founder and director of operations Lorenzo De Plano. “Brendan McDermott, Jomie Raymond, Ricardo Bolanos, Luis Velazquez, Eric Anwar and myself all partnered up when we saw a huge void in the market created by the introduction of popular new non-sub-ohm devices such as the iCare, MyJet, Juul, Phix, etc.”

    Recognizing that these devices took market share away from the hobbyist vape brands, and concerned about the quality of the liquids available on the market, the Solace Vapor team set out to create something entirely different.

    “That’s when we decided to create Solace Nicotine Salts,” he says. “Brendan and Jomie had worked on a number of prestigious global brands and products since the early days of vaping, such as Ripe Vapes and Coastline. This, coupled with Luis and Ricardo’s manufacturing and distribution abilities, formed a powerful concoction to propel this new category to the next level.”

    In the year since its founding, Solace Vapor has taken the e-liquid industry by storm. The company traded in its tiny basement office where the team first experimented with flavor formulations for a high-rise facility in the heart of Los Angeles. They also upgraded their manufacturing process and mastered the production of a product that has since elevated them to their current status as leader of the nicotine salts pack.

    “We are the first and most trusted nicotine salt company and currently control approximately 85–90 percent of the entire open bottle market for nicotine salts,” says De Plano.

    Although their product offerings are geared toward all types of vapers, many of Solace’s customers are ex-smokers and people who want to utilize smaller, more casual devices that pack more of a punch.

    “Our highly popular nicotine salts line is designed for all smaller, low-wattage vaping devices. Nicotine salts have an altered pH balance through the addition of various nontoxic acidic compounds, which essentially recreate nicotine as it exists in tobacco leaves,” says De Plano. “Up until recently, a traditional combustible cigarette would always have a nicotine delivery that was more efficient than a standard vapor product. This is why people who use cigarettes claim not to get the same ‘rushes’ when they use vape products. With hardware technology improving every day and smaller, more low-wattage devices such as the iCare, MyJet and others becoming progressively more popular, we took it upon ourselves to develop a new type of e-liquid that is designed specifically for smaller vape devices that run on lower wattages.”

    Although its products have only been on the market since last year, critics have taken notice of the company’s innovative e-liquid offerings, and Solace recently received recognition for its efforts. The company’s nicotine salts won the title of “Best New Product” at the Tobacco Plus Expo (TPE) held in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, in January.

    “It means a lot to us to win TPE,” says De Plano. “We’ve come a long way, and it’s good to see that our slow and steady approach to product development has finally paid off. We’ve worked hard, and this award and other accolades like it have definitely validated our product category.”

    Vapor industry players aren’t the only ones with positive things to say about Solace’s products. With unique flavors that range from vanilla bean and butterscotch to peppermint patty and strawberry hard candy, Solace has something to offer vapers with a wide array of varying preferences.

    “Vapers who use our flavors are immediately surprised by how much better and more affordable it is when compared to other prefilled pods and high-nicotine juices,” says De Plano. “We also see many people coming back as return customers due to the flavors and effectiveness of our nicotine salts. We’re seeing more and more people rarely going back to vaping normal 0 mg, 3 mg and 6 mg juices after finishing a bottle of Solace. We’re also thankful to our loyal brand following, which is by far the largest in the category.”

    Another benefit vapers discover when they sample items from Solace’s e-liquid selection is the ability to enjoy a satisfying vaping experience without having to switch up their hardware—or turning back to traditional cigarettes for a nicotine fix.

    “Having customers reach out to us and tell us they can continue to vape and not smoke now that they have a viable liquid to use with their smaller devices” is one of Solace’s biggest accomplishments, De Plano says.

    Keeping customers satisfied and earning repeat business is also of the utmost importance to the company’s founders.

    “At Solace Vapor, we like to specialize in quality products and innovation—and, above all, consistency. We’re not interested in creating products that only entice a purchaser once or twice,” says De Plano. “We’ve built up a strong base of return customers that we’re very proud of. This number of customers grows every day.”

    In addition to continuing to gain new customers and keep current customers coming back for more of the company’s unique e-liquid offerings, the focus of the future for Solace Vapor could potentially involve developing new vapor devices.

    “We’ve made significant forays into hardware, but we’re going to let everyone else duke it out and saturate the market with hardware devices before making any decisions ourselves,” says De Plano. “We see ourselves as a flavor- and product-oriented company first. We want to focus on creating all of the e-liquids that go into these devices and controlling that aspect of the business first.”

    Though recent regulations have prevented the Solace team from developing new products to add to their current lineup, De Plano remains hopeful for both the future of his company and of the vapor industry as a whole.

    “Right now, we think the market is still licking its wounds from years of both e-liquid and hardware product oversaturation,” he says. “We also feel that the vape industry is still in its infant stages and that there’s still much to do in terms of product development and innovation across the board. As the industry matures, we’re going to see a very different and less saturated market space as less dedicated players start to fall by the wayside. Solace would like to approach the market in a different way by emphasizing customer loyalty, product quality and focusing on building a powerful brand that retains its customers.”

     

     

  • Nicotine dialogues

    The Global Forum on Nicotine is organizing a series of public dialogues in the UK.

    The organizers say that the format of the events is designed to stimulate discussion and debate, involving the audience, on the often-contentious issue of vaping in public and work places.

    The dialogues are due to be held in Leicester on March 21, Liverpool on March 22 and Glasgow on March 23.

    Each will start at 14:00 and end by 17:00.Nicotine dialogues

    The Leicester event, which is to be hosted by the Leicester City Council Stop Smoking Services, will see Professor Gerry Stimson, programme director of the Global Forum on Nicotine, in the chair, and will include panellists Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos, of the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens; Ruth Tennant, director of Public Health Leicester; Louise Ross, manager of Leicester’s Stop Smoking Services, and Alan Law, a vaper and vaping advocate.

    The Liverpool event, which is to be hosted by HIT, will see Pat O’Hare, director of HIT, in the chair, and panellists Farsalinos; Sarah Jakes, secretary of the New Nicotine Alliance; and Dr. Russell Newcombe, research and evaluation manager, User Voice.

    The Glasgow event, which is to be hosted by the Centre for Substance Use Research, will see Dr. Delon Human, of Health Diplomats, in the chair, and panellists Farsalinos; Andy Morrison, of the New Nicotine Alliance, Scotland; Dr. Joanna Miler, of the Centre for Substance Use Research; and Robbie Preece, NHSGG&C Health Improvement Lead – Tobacco.

    Attendance at the dialogues is free, but those interested in participating are required to register.

  • Video: Sweanor and Kovacevic discuss vapor

    Video: Sweanor and Kovacevic discuss vapor

    Watch David Sweanor, adjunct professor of law at the University of Ottawa, speak with Patricia Kovacevic, general counsel and chief compliance officer at Nicopure Labs, about the vaping industry and Canadian law versus U.S. law.

  • Call for halt to e-cig regs

    Call for halt to e-cig regs

    Ron Johnson, chairman of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has asked Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf to cease implementing burdensome regulations on e-cigarettes.

    In his letter to Califf, Johnson described the FDA’s vapor regulations as “industry killing.”

    “In light of the significant economic costs on the e-cigarette industry and the substantial likelihood that the incoming administration and the 115th Congress will unwind this burdensome regulation, I call on the FDA to cease its implementation of the current regulation over e-cigarettes,” he wrote.

    “I hope the FDA will acknowledge the reality of the situation and ensure that small businesses and consumers do not continue to incur avoidable financial costs due to this regulation.”

     

     

  • Cloud capable

    Cloud capable

    The new Smok TFV8 might be one of the best sub-ohm tanks on the market.

    By Mike Huml

    Mike Huml is product development manager at Wholesale Vaping Supply. An enthusiast vaper since 2009, he is always trying to get his hands on the newest, shiniest mod. Huml has evaluated countless vaping devices over the years, but you'll usually find him with a mechanical mod and RDA in-hand, surrounded by an aura of fog. His personal motto: “Happiness is a warm coil.”
    Mike Huml is product development manager at Wholesale Vaping Supply. An enthusiast vaper since 2009, he is always trying to get his hands on the newest, shiniest mod. Huml has evaluated countless vaping devices over the years, but you’ll usually find him with a mechanical mod and RDA in-hand, surrounded by an aura of fog. His personal motto: “Happiness is a warm coil.”

    As with the majority of the most successful vapor products on the market, the TFV8 from Smok doesn’t try to do anything too crazy. The simplest description that can be presented is, “It’s a better TFV4.” As a buyer, one should have a fairly good idea as to what to expect and how it will sell in one’s particular market. Read on to find out what makes the TFV8 different from, similar to and better than the TFV4.

    First, the similarities. Both the TFV8 and TFV4 are designed with cloud-chasers and lung hits in mind. Neither are ideal for the mouth-to-lung vaper, and there are better options out there that will result in more satisfied customers. Both tanks feature a 24.5 mm diameter that allows for larger coils, more airflow and more vapor production. As such, both tanks look better on box mods with a little extra room around the 510 connection; the Reuleaux, X Cube and H-Priv are all good options. Both tanks also feature top-filling by way of a top cap that swivels out to reveal the fill hole. Lastly, both tanks require a good amount of power to perform optimally. While one can get away with a 60- to 80-watt device, 100 watts seems to be the minimum in order for the TFV8 to really shine. Of course, if using the included RBA deck, smaller wire can be used to build custom coils that will function better at lower wattage ranges.

    Moving on to the differences, the most apparent upgrade is the build quality. Overall, the TFV8 feels and looks markedly more solid than the TFV4. All the pieces of the tank fit together snugly, and the final product is straight as an arrow with no gaps or leaning. The stainless steel is also a bit smoother and more polished, which makes for an overall cleaner and bolder aesthetic compared to its predecessor.

    In terms of performance, the TFV8 yet again one-ups the TFV4. The chimney, coils and airflow holes have been widened to allow for a broader range of airflow options. At maximum airflow, the TFV8 feels like a quality RDA, particularly when used with the RBA deck. In addition, this creates the nice side effect of eliminating spitback. While many other sub-ohm tanks implement some form of spitback prevention that ultimately doesn’t work, or makes spitback worse, the TFV8 doesn’t advertise any sort of spitback prevention at all. Yet, because of its widened design and large drip tip, condensed vapor never gets the chance to cling to the airflow and end up in the user’s mouth, even when pulling hard. Regardless of the coil type installed, the TFV8 offers a remarkably smooth draw devoid of any turbulence whatsoever. However, this was tested with thicker liquid. Having been designed to produce massive clouds, it’s assumed that the user will be using e-liquid with a minimum ratio of 30 PG/70 VG. The use of thinner liquids may or may not affect performance.

    In addition to enhanced vapor production, flavor has also been improved compared with the TFV4. The TFV4 was notorious for having a long break-in time, but with the TFV8, it’s barely noticeable. Each coil differs slightly, but all of them are wicked with organic cotton, which has quickly become the standard wicking material for the majority of atomizers. Smok has also scaled coil options down from the far too many available for the TFV4 to four varieties for the TFV8, including the RBA head. The kit includes a quad-coil (V8-T4), an octuple-coil (V8-T8) and the RBA head, with a sextuple-coil (V8-T6) available separately. Each coil type is built in parallel for increased surface area. The T6 coil features three separate chambers with parallel coils in each, while the T8 coil is almost identical except that it boasts four separate chambers. The T6 coil has the most restricted airflow out of the bunch, and those seeking the most flavor should choose these coils when replacements are needed. However, for pure vapor production, the T4 coils are king. These heads have one enormous chamber with two separate strands of parallel wire and provide the most airflow. That’s not to say flavor is poor when using the T4 coils. In fact, all the coil options are very similar and differ in only what is emphasized. All three coil varieties have incredible flavor and airflow, yet each is slightly tweaked to offer a choice to cloud-chasers with different preferences. Of course, airflow can always be adjusted via the airflow ring, so between the coil options and adjustable airflow, an infinite number of permutations exist to satisfy every type of cloud-chaser.

    TRIED AND TESTED

    The RBA deck comes included with the TFV8 and is one of the best rebuildable sections available due to its Velocity-style design. While other sub-ohm tanks try to get creative with their RBA heads, this often leads to subpar performance compared to their respective pre-made coils. Smok uses a tried-and-true design that’s easy to build and performs better than any RTA. Normally, it’s recommended to use a dedicated RTA if exclusively rebuilding, while RBA sections for sub-ohm tanks generally serve as either a fun piece of hardware to tinker with or a last resort when coils are out of stock. That is not the case here. Any vape shop employee should feel comfortable in recommending the TFV8 to anyone looking for a great RTA, even if the customer isn’t interested in ever using replacement heads. The TFV8 RBA head wicks perfectly, can handle larger builds with any type of wire and has equal airflow to the T4 coils and most RDAs. In fact, it comes pre-built with dual fused Claptons with an inner diameter of 3.5 mm. That’s one of the many benefits of the 24.5 mm diameter: The RBA head is approaching the size of a proper RDA build deck. Of course, the increased capacity is a welcome feature as well.

    As previously mentioned, both the TFV4 and TFV8 require a high-power device in order to be used to their full potential. Any dual-18650 should do the trick, but it is possible to use lower wattages for a cooler, lighter hit. While the coils are advertised to perform at up to 260 watts, extreme caution should be exercised if attempting this. With a dual-18650 mod, this essentially means that each battery is supplying 130 watts of power. To put this in perspective, imagine the performance, battery strain and battery life one would get while using a 0.15-ohm coil at 130 watts on a single-18650 battery mod. The results would be short-lived, at best. Make sure to use appropriate batteries, and start around 60 to 80 watts before increasing power incrementally until the preferred performance is reached. A power of 260 watts is overkill, resulting in damage to most batteries, short battery life and potentially unsafe conditions overall.

    One additional improvement over the TFV4 is the top-fill swivel door. In the past, it was possible to put the TFV4 in a pocket or bag only to have the door swivel unintentionally and leak. The TFV8 reduces this possibility by increasing the tightness of the door, and it even requires the user to press down slightly when closing it. This provides some much-needed tension that keeps the door in place. For extra peace of mind, the TFV8 includes two silicone bands that can help hold the door in place more reliably, as well as help protect the glass in the event that the tank or mod is dropped or tipped over. If the glass somehow does break, the TFV8 comes included with a replacement too.

    All in all, the TFV8 from Smok takes all the feedback and criticism from the TFV4 into account and ticks all the boxes in regard to what a sub-ohm tank should be. Not only is this arguably the best sub-ohm tank available, but it’s among the best RTAs as well. Any customer looking for clouds without sacrificing flavor will be pleased, if not surprised, with the TFV8. It’s simple and solid, which serves most vape hardware much better than gimmicks and excessive deviation from the norm. Think of the TFV8 as the Karate Kid of sub-ohm tanks, relying on the quality of the few things it knows well, rather than on an abundance of things it can’t, and shouldn’t, strive to perfect.  Things like janky juice flow control, spitback prevention “technology,” shoddy heat dissipation, and unique and complicated rebuilding technique requirements are nowhere to be found here—because they’re not needed and not missed whatsoever. With a smaller pool of coils to choose from (with far less redundancy compared to the TFV4) and a near-perfect RBA deck, the TFV8 will no doubt find its way into the hands of many a cloud-chaser.