Tag: e-cigarettes

  • Two Tobacco Firms Allowed to Sue for EU Flavor Ban

    Two Tobacco Firms Allowed to Sue for EU Flavor Ban

    The Four Courts Building on the river Liffey in Dublin, Ireland (Credit: Nigel)

    Two manufacturers of next-generation tobacco products have been granted permission by Ireland’s High Court to bring a challenge over a new EU directive banning flavored heated tobacco products.

    Ireland is set to transpose the new EU law by next July. But the country’s oldest tobacco manufacturer, PJ Carroll and Co., along with BAT-owned next-generation nicotine firm, Nicoventures Trading, claim the EU directive is invalid. Their challenge is against the Minister for Health, Ireland and the Attorney General.

    Under previous regulations, flavored heated tobacco products were not banned, but this was changed by the EU Commission which wants member states to transpose the ban by July 23rd, according to Breaking News Ireland.

    In 2021, PJ Carroll, which currently holds 10 percent of the Irish market for e-cigarettes, says it began taking steps to commercialize heated tobacco products in Ireland, including flavored ones.

    However, the company says, the banning of these products by the EU severely undermined its “ability to capitalize fully on the unique opportunity of being the first company to launch heated tobacco products on the Irish market for adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke.”

  • Philippine Vape Sellers Must Register at Tax Bureau

    Philippine Vape Sellers Must Register at Tax Bureau

    Credit: Carsten Reisinger

    The Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) has requested that vape merchants register their businesses to avoid serious consequences in the future, reports the Manila Bulletin.

    Criminal tax evasion charges will be filed against merchants that do not comply with revenue regulations, according to BIR Commissioner Romeo D. Lumagui Jr. Tax evasion charges were previously brought against five major importers and distributors of vapor products, totaling over PHP1 billion ($18.2 million).

    Under the law, first-time offenders face a fine of PHP2 million and up to two years in jail. Second-time offenders face a fine of PHP4 million and up to four years in jail. Third-time offenders face a fine of PHP5 million and up to six years in jail. Foreign nationals caught breaking the law would face immediate deportation after serving the appropriate jail term.

    In October, The Philippines Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) began consulting the public for the crafting of the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the country’s new vape laws.

  • Hong Kong Bans all CBD Products Beginning Feb. 1

    Hong Kong Bans all CBD Products Beginning Feb. 1

    Credit: Proxima Studio

    Hong Kong announced that it will ban all products containing cannabidiol (CBD) beginning on Feb. 1. CBD will be added to the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (DDO) and will join over 200 substances already listed in the ordinance (including fentanyl, ketamine, heroin, and many psychoactive compounds, eg lysergamides).

    CBD will be added with the already covered “cannabinol and its tetrahydro derivatives (THC); and their 3-alkyl homologues.” Following this change, anyone who possesses or consumes CBD faces up to seven years in jail and fines of up to HK$1 million ($128,000). Manufacturers of CBD may also face life imprisonment, according to Lexology.

    While many users around the world have been promoting the anxiolytic and pain-relieving properties of CBD, Hong Kong’s Security Bureau has taken the view that such claims “lack authoritative scientific proof”. This directive appears to be in line with the ban imposed in China last year for the use of CBD in cosmetic products.

    From the Government reports it remains unclear as to whether other cannabinoids (e.g., CBG, CBDV, CBC, etc.) will be included in the ban. However, from the Narcotics Division memorandum in November, the main concern of the Government appears to be with CBD products that may contain some THC, either “through decomposition or conversion”, and the lack of international regulations for such products.

    “It does appear that with better international regulation and scientific data it is conceivable that the policy around CBD may change again in the future,” the authors write. “Therefore, given that there are no restrictions in Hong Kong for pursuing patent protection for CBD and related technologies, it remains prudent to maintain patents and pending applications in Hong Kong for CBD-related innovations should the position in Hong Kong change, as we have seen in other countries in the region, such as South Korea, Malaysia and Thailand.”

  • New Zealand Solicits Feedback on Vaping Restrictions

    New Zealand Solicits Feedback on Vaping Restrictions

    Photo: Brian Jackson

    New Zealand’s government is seeking feedback on measures to help reduce the number of young people vaping, reports a The Times Online.

    According to Associate Health Minister Ayesha Verrall, vaping is becoming increasingly popular among New Zealand youth, including among youngsters who have never smoked.

    “Vaping has a role to play in ensuring smokers who wish to quit smoking can do so using vaping products; however youth vaping rates are too high and we need to strike a better balance,” she was quoted as saying.

    The proposed measures include proximity restrictions for all new specialist vape retailers, so they are not near schools and sports grounds; restrictions on flavor names to avoid attracting youth; and restrictions on single-use vaping products, which are cheaper and more easily accessible than other e-cigarettes.

    In addition, the government wants to reduce the maximum concentration of nicotine salts in single-use products from 50mg/mL to 35mg/mL and require vaping companies to print serial or batch numbers on their products to make them traceable.

    The consultation document is available on the Ministry of Health website with submissions closing at 5pm on March 15.

  • PMI Takes Top Spot in 2022 Vape Patent Applications

    PMI Takes Top Spot in 2022 Vape Patent Applications

    Credit: Olivier le Moal

    Tobacco-related products, especially vaping and heat-not-burn, were among the 10 fastest growing technologies in 2022 when measured by the number of U.S. patents issued, according to IFI Claims Patent Services.

    Philip Morris International, which is in the process of replacing its combustible cigarette business with less harmful smoking alternatives, was the most prolific claimant in the vaping/tobacco business, filing 1,364 cigarette patent applications in 2022.

    South Korean electronics titan Samsung took the top spot from longtime leader IBM. Following Samsung and IBM, the top 10 patent earners were Taiwan Semiconductor, Huawei Technologies, Canon, LG Electronics, Qualcomm, Intel, Apple and Toyota Motor.

    Technology related to autonomous vehicles ascended to the No. 1 spot among IFI’s Fastest Growing Technologies list last year. While “Computing Based on Biological Models” dropped to No. 4 from its perch at No. 1 last year, artificial intelligence research has pervaded multiple patent categories, including earth drilling, quantum computers and machine learning.

    Rounding out the top fastest growing technologies were “Electrical Digital Data Processing,” with a compound annual growth rate CAGR) of 33.9 percent; “Special Features Related to Earth Drilling Including AI and Simulation Models” (CAGR 32.5 percent); “Computing Based on Biological Models” (CAGR 32.1 percent); and “Electrically Operated Smoking Devices” (CAGR 31.3 percent).

    “Cigars, Cigarettes” registered a CAGR of 28.3 percent.

  • Vietnam Health Officials Again Call for Ban on Vaping

    Vietnam Health Officials Again Call for Ban on Vaping

    Credit: Miro Novak

    Vietnam’s Ministry of Health has again called for a ban on all new tobacco products following the publication of a study suggesting that youth vaping has led to more hospitalizations for psychosis, hallucinations or respiratory failure, reports VietnamPlus.

    A recent study found that the e-cigarette smoking rate among students increased to 3.5 percent in 2021 from 2.6 percent in 2019, according to Nguyen Thi Thu Huong, an official from the Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund at the Ministry of Health.

    “E-cigarette devices that look like USB drives, pen or pen boxes are making it tough for parents to detect and keep their kids from vaping,” said Nguyen Huu Hoang, a lecturer from the Medical Education Center at Ho Chi Minh City’s University of Medicine and Pharmacy. “They also make young people curious and excited by their eye-catching, fashionable and modern designs.”

    In November, Vietnam’s health ministry proposed a ban on next-generation tobacco products (NGPs), reports VN Express International. The country’s current law on tobacco harm prevention lacks provisions for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

  • U.S. FDA Says Misinformation ‘Leading Cause of Death’

    U.S. FDA Says Misinformation ‘Leading Cause of Death’

    The role of misinformation in the vaping industry was not mentioned when past and present commissioners of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration came together recently to discuss the role misinformation plays in public health.

    The group say the agency needs partners in combatting public health misinformation, and industry, clinicians, patient advocates and academic leaders all have a role to play.

    “Realistically, FDA needs help,” Mark McClellan, who served as FDA Commissioner from 2002-2004, said at the 2023 Innovations in Regulatory Science Summit sponsored by the UCSF-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI).

    On the FDA’s own website there are youth vaping prevention posters available to be used by various groups including doctors, schools, and state and local public health agencies. These claim, amongst other dangers, that “[n]icotine can rewire a teen’s brain to crave more nicotine and can create addiction,” despite there being no scientific basis for this claim.

    While there is currently a lack of trust in officials from public health agencies, individuals still have trust in their own physicians, community leaders, and others who are “close to their experience,” McClellan said during a panel discussion among past and present FDA commissioners about how to counter the problem of misinformation and restore trust in the agency.

    However, a 2021 study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health found that more than 75 percent of U.S. physicians believe that nicotine directly contributes to cancer and cardiovascular disease.

    On the FDA’s website, the agency states, “while nicotine has a number of toxic effects on the body, it is not the primary cause of cancer and other chronic smoking-related diseases. More than 7,000 chemicals are present in cigarette smoke, including more than 70 that can cause cancer.”

    Janet Woodcock, the agency’s Principal Deputy Commissioner who served as Acting Commissioner from 2021-2022, said patient advocates are trusted and often aligned with FDA’s mission but that their reach is often limited to the disease areas where they are focused, leaving prevention and treatment of common diseases as areas where misinformation can proliferate, according to an article from Regulatory Focus.

    “I actually believe that misinformation is the leading cause of death right now in the U.S. because whether we’re looking at COVID or chronic disease, people are making bad choices driven by the information that they get,” said current FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, who also served in the role from 2016-2017. “We were just not prepared for what broad access to the Internet would do to communication channels.”

    Califf called out the academic community for not doing more on the misinformation front and said some of their criticism of FDA and other public health agencies is having unintended consequences.

    “As a public agency, we need to be critiqued, but I think often the people that are doing the critiquing assume that the agency’s going to be there in the future in the way that they expect it to be there,” Califf said. “So, they’re critiquing it to make it better. But to a lot of unsuspecting people that hear it, it just completely erodes their belief in the institution.”

    In an FDA-funded study last year, researchers found that the use of electronic cigarettes costs the United States $15 billion annually in healthcare expenditures—more than $2,000 per person a year. The study, published on May 23 in Tobacco Control, was the first to look at the healthcare costs of e-cigarette use among adults aged 18 and older, according to researchers at the University of California San Francisco School of Nursing.

    The study was found to be rife with misinformation after it claimed that healthcare expenditures for a person who uses e-cigarettes are $2,024 more per year than for a person who doesn’t use any tobacco products. Chuck Dinerstein, director of medicine at the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), who has over 25 years of experience as a vascular surgeon, said that in order to get their data, researchers developed a model using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a household survey of the general population in the U.S. that includes detailed questions on health and use of tobacco products.

    “The researchers point to a study using NHIS data that per smoker—meaning combustible—attributable healthcare expenditures are $5,602,” explained Dinerstein. “The finding of this study, for both those exclusively using e-cigarettes and the dual users, is roughly a third as much. E-cigarettes reduce healthcare utilization and costs.”

    Scott Gottlieb, who served as FDA Commissioner from 2017 to 2019, said rapid response to online misinformation is critical and floated the idea of giving industry more leeway to counter false or misleading information about products. It is currently illegal for any vaping product manufacturer to make health claims concerning e-cigarettes, including saying they are safer than combustible cigarettes.

    While commissioner, Gottlieb championed e-cigarettes as a way to help adults stop smoking. 

    “We’ve seen FDA weigh in, admirably, around some dangerous disinformation on specific products,” he said. “But that can’t be the business of the FDA.”

    Margaret Hamburg, who served as FDA Commissioner from 2009-2015, said that while some of the larger issues around misinformation are difficult to solve, FDA can take concrete steps to restore public confidence in its role. That boils down to showing why FDA matters, how the agency does its work and opening up some of the processes that have historically not been transparent, she said.

    “Despite so much that is going on that is hard for FDA to control, the work of the agency and its trustworthiness can be demonstrated,” Hamburg said.

    That transparency is especially important in areas where there is the most controversy, McClellan said.

  • Google to Allow Limited CBD Advertising in 3 Markets

    Google to Allow Limited CBD Advertising in 3 Markets

    Credit: NMann77

    In a sudden change of policy, Google will allow the advertising of hemp and topical CBD products in California, Colorado and Puerto Rico under an update to its policies on “Dangerous Products and Services and Healthcare and Medicines.”

    Google did not make clear why it is restricting the advertising to the three distinct markets, according to Hemp Today.

    Advertising for CBD for internal human consumption remains off limits, the company said, including those for “supplements, food additives, and inhalants.” Also, masthead advertising on YouTube (owned by Google), which appears at the top of the page in the main feed across all devices, is not available to hemp and CBD products, under the policy revisions.

    Google also said pharmaceuticals approved by under the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may now also be advertised in those jurisdictions. That part of the rule change will benefit only one producer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, whose high-CBD Epidiolex is the lone such product approved by the agency to date. Epidiolex is prescribed for severe seizure disorders in children. It was approved by the FDA in 2020.

    The changes take effect Jan. 20. Advertisers can request certification with Google starting on that date, when an application form will be published.

    Google said it has contracted with LegitScript, a Portland, Oregon-based internet and payments compliance company that provides certification in high-risk industries, as a clearinghouse to determine products’ advertising eligibility. Only products that pass muster with LegitScript can be promoted on Google platforms.

    Those seeking certification to advertise on Google must provide samples of their products or THC testing and provide LegitScript with third-party certificates of analysis, according to Google.

  • Duel Identity

    Duel Identity

    ALD’s new XPLLO offers a quality vaping experience for a large segment of the vapor market.              

    By Mike Huml

    The ALD XPLLO is a straightforward pod system device from ALD. It uses both disposable and refillable pods, leaving either option open according to user preference. For anyone looking for something a little more robust than a disposable without sacrificing ease of use, the XPLLO fits the bill perfectly.

    The XPLLO is about average in terms of size compared to similar devices while being slightly heavier than a disposable. This is likely due to higher quality materials and a larger battery that clocks in at 580 mAh. The XPLLO fires a 1.7 ohm heating element at 7.5 watts, so the 580 mAh battery goes a long way due to low current draw. That’s not to say that the vapor is weak—far from it, and without being told the specifications prior, you would never guess it’s only firing at 7.5 watts.

    The pod itself holds 2 mL of e-liquid, and the coil cannot be replaced. Once the coil or the pod is used up, the entire pod gets replaced. It’s held in place with relatively strong magnets that yield a slight amount of play but without feeling janky. Pods are secure once installed, and that can be demonstrated by lifting up the XPLLO while gripping only the pod and shaking it a bit. It stays assembled with no issues. Each mod is made out of translucent plastic, so it’s comfortable between the lips or teeth, and remaining e-liquid can be viewed with ease.

    The XPLLO has a single button that can be used to fire the device or turn it on or off with five successive clicks. However, the XPLLO is also draw activated, making it a good fit for fans of both types of activation. The body is aluminum, contributing nearly completely to the quality difference between two-piece pod systems like the XPLLO and single-piece plastic disposables. The obligatory LED is included here as well, illuminating when a drag is taken or when the device is powered on or off. The color acts as an indicator as to the remaining battery charge.

    Speaking of the battery, at 580 mAh, it can last upward of four hours of use depending on the user’s vaping habits. A USB-C port is located on the tip of the XPLLO, and a full charge can be achieved in under 30 minutes with the right charger or adapter. Thankfully, USB-C ports are becoming more and more common on vapor devices, which not only leads to faster charging and a higher level of compatibility (mobile devices have used USB-C for years) but also alleviates the annoyance of fiddling with the charging cable, flipping it over to make sure it’s oriented correctly.

    When it comes to performance, the XPLLO can compete with the best of them. Flavor is crisp and clean, and vapor production is surprisingly robust given the relatively high resistance of the heating element and low power output. No sacrifices were made in the vapor department, but there are huge gains when it comes to battery life. Like other ALD products, vapor is produced effortlessly with no spitback or gurgling. The airflow is perfect for mouth-to-lung vaping, and few people will miss the ability to tweak the airflow.

    It can be difficult to stand out in the vapor industry now that pod systems and disposables have saturated the market. At a glance, they can all look very similar to one another. Performance is where the standouts can be seen, and the XPLLO certainly stands out. It offers several options not generally available on disposables, such as the dual-activated switch and power toggle functionality, but remains simple enough that anyone can pick it up and get a fantastic vaping experience with no learning curve.

    The XPLLO from ALD represents everything that a pod system should be—simple, reliable and hassle-free. It doesn’t sacrifice an iota of performance or quality to achieve these things. It acts as both a perfect entry point for new vapers and an upgrade for those coming from disposables. It’s also a formidable option for more advanced users who want something quick and easy to carry around when large mods become too cumbersome. It’s a wide and diverse market, and the XPLLO checks many boxes that will appeal to said market.

    All in all, the XPLLO represents great value for anyone looking to pick up a pod system. It pulls no punches and sacrifices nearly nothing to provide a convenient, quality and reliable vaping experience for a large segment of the vapor market.

  • New UNC Report Pushes False EVALI Narrative

    New UNC Report Pushes False EVALI Narrative

    Credit: People Images

    A new report from University of North Carolina researchers pushes the false claim that nicotine vaping products cause e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI).

    “At its core, EVALI is a serious disease that primarily affects the lungs and results in a substantial number of hospitalizations and deaths in a relatively young and otherwise healthy population across the United States,” said Meghan Rebuli, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics in the UNC School of Medicine, stated in a press release. “This epidemic is largely caused by the unregulated and quickly evolving nature of the e-cigarette industry and certainly highlights the need for continued action by both researchers and government agencies.”

    In 2021, Rebuli co-led a virtual workshop which brought together pulmonologists, public health officials, epidemiologists, and toxicologists from across the U.S. to discuss their latest research findings and recommendations. A new report, with Rebuli as its lead author, was published in the Annals of the American Thoracic Society in December 2022.

    The the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that vitamin E acetate used in THC-based vaping products was “more than likely responsible” for causing EVALI. However, Vitamin E acetate wasn’t found in all of the EVALI-associated products, according to Rebuli.

    “So, it is still quite possible that there are other components in e-cigarettes that can cause EVALI,” said Rebuli. “We just have not identified many of those yet.”

    No components of nicotine-based vaping products have been associated with EVALI, according to the CDC.

    In July of 2020, the CDC said states no longer have to track lung-related injuries caused by marijuana-based vapor products, partly because cases have dropped. The CDC said it stopped requiring states to report the numbers after it “pinpointed vitamin E acetate as the culprit in THC e-cigarettes” making people sick. The CDC said it is monitoring EVALI cases and hasn’t seen an uptick nationwide. However, It said the agency will continue to provide assistance to states as needed.

    EVALI and false reporting surrounding its cause has boosted misinformation surrounding nicotine vaping products. A new study led by researchers at the American Cancer Society (ACS) shows perceptions of e-cigarettes as being “more harmful” than cigarettes by adults in the United States more than doubled between 2019-2020 and perceptions of e-cigarettes as “less harmful” declined between 2018-2020, when the EVALI concern was at its peak.

    Dr. Kumar Subaramaniam, a physician based in Malaysia, says he finds the increased usage of the term EVALI worrisome, as it is often discussed in the wrong context, according to the New Strait Times. Kumar said that the issue lies with certain parties, who bring up EVALI at the mention of vaping, while repeating and spreading mistruths about vaping.

    When the CDC identified the real culprit behind the EVALI outbreak, the presence of vitamin E acetate that was added into illegal tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products, Kumar said the CDC’s slow reaction to announcing the cause caused the mishap that left a bad reputation on vaping, which was touted to give many smokers a chance to quit smoking tobacco products for good.

    “So, it was not vaping that was the problem, rather the misuse and abuse of the products. But the damage has been done and the half-baked truths surrounding EVALI live on to this day,” he says. “The EVALI saga should not be used as a ‘boogeyman’ to dissuade us from seeking to regulate vaping and adopt a ‘zero-tolerance’ attitude. In fact, the EVALI saga in the U.S. shows above all the importance of regulations.”