Tag: e-cigarettes

  • U.S. Appeals Court Delays FDA’s Ban on Juul

    U.S. Appeals Court Delays FDA’s Ban on Juul

    Credit: Tanasin

    A federal appeals court today granted Juul Labs Inc. a temporary stay of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s order for the vaping company to pull its e-cigarettes off the U.S. market.

    “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider petitioner’s forthcoming emergency motion for stay pending court review and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the court wrote.

    The e-cigarette maker had earlier asked the court to pause what it calls an “extraordinary and unlawful action by the regulatory agency that would require it to immediately halt its business.

    The company filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington as it prepares to appeal the FDA´s decision.

    Juul said that the FDA cannot argue that there was a “critical and urgent public interest” in immediately removing its products from the market when the agency allowed them to be sold during its review.

    The company noted that the FDA denied its application while authorizing those submitted by competitors with similar products.

    The order sets a briefing schedule of June 27 for the petitioner’s emergency motion; July 7 for the respondent’s response, and July 12 for the reply.

    The request for an emergency stay while waiting to file an appeal was expected.

    “We respectfully disagree with the FDA’s findings … intend to seek a stay and are exploring all of our options under the FDA’s regulations and the law, including appealing the decision and engaging with our regulator,” said Joe Murillo, chief regulatory officer at Juul Labs, said in a statement. “We remain committed to doing all in our power to continue serving the millions of American adult smokers who have successfully used our products to transition away from combustible cigarettes, which remain available on market shelves nationwide.”

    The marketing denial order, which concerns the FDA’s analysis of Juul products has not been released to the public. “Any portion of the record that was placed under seal . . . before an agency remains under seal in this court unless otherwise ordered,” the emergency motion states.

  • Geek Bar Develops ‘Supply Chain Charter’ to Combat Fakes

    Geek Bar Develops ‘Supply Chain Charter’ to Combat Fakes

    Geek Bar launched its new “supply chain charter’ as part of a crackdown on “rising levels of malpractice across the distribution and retail of disposable vape products.”

    The charter covers “every aspect of the supply chain,” the company said, from product sourcing to sale of devices to customers. The company has been working to crack down on “the challenge of illicit disposable vape products finding their way into the country” it said.

    Late last year, over-strength Geek Bar products were found to be openly sold online in an investigation by the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA). In the UK, regulations state that disposable vapes should contain no more than 20mg/ml of nicotine nor have above 2ml liquid capacity.

    Geek Bar Pros, manufactured for markets where regulations are different and allow higher nicotine concentrations, have been amongst the non-compliant products finding their way into the UK market, according to The Grocer.

    The brand has also been involved in closing 12 counterfeit factories in China which had manufactured more than 100,000 counterfeit Geek Bars destined for the UK.

    “We have been working tirelessly over the last six months to review our business operations to ensure that no stone has been left unturned and ensure adult smokers continue to enjoy the highest quality and safest vaping experience when using our products,” said Allen Yang, CEO at Geek Bar.

    “We will not tolerate malpractice amongst distributors and retailers who want to supply and sell our products but do not do it legitimately. Through the development of the charter we are upping the ante even more to ensure rogue traders do not succeed in our marketplace,” he added.

    The charter commits the company and its supply chain partners to various measures, including more stringent batch control, clearer distribution contracts, product authenticity checks for retailers and consumers, tamper-proof packaging and faster product recall procedures.

    “The charter is designed to set the bar very high when it comes to disposable vape standards in the supply chain. These standards have been under scrutiny in recent months as the category has attracted significant interest and demand,” Yang said.

    The sector has been making efforts to curb non-regulation and counterfeit products finding their way onto the UK market, as well as tackling underage sales.

  • It’s Official: FDA Denies Juul U.S. Market Access

    It’s Official: FDA Denies Juul U.S. Market Access

    Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirmed what many had already been anticipating: Juul Labs must remove all currently marketed Juul products from the U.S. market.

    “Today’s action is further progress on the FDA’s commitment to ensuring that all e-cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery system products currently being marketed to consumers meet our public health standards,” said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf. “The agency has dedicated significant resources to review products from the companies that account for most of the U.S. market. We recognize these make up a significant part of the available products and many have played a disproportionate role in the rise in youth vaping.”

    These marketing denial orders (MDO) pertain only to the commercial distribution, importation and retail sales of these products, and do not restrict individual consumer possession or use—the FDA cannot and will not enforce against individual consumer possession or use of Juul products or any other tobacco products.

    “We respectfully disagree with the FDA’s findings … intend to seek a stay and are exploring all of our options under the FDA’s regulations and the law, including appealing the decision and engaging with our regulator,” said Joe Murillo, chief regulatory officer at Juul Labs, said in a statement. “We remain committed to doing all in our power to continue serving the millions of American adult smokers who have successfully used our products to transition away from combustible cigarettes, which remain available on market shelves nationwide.”

    After reviewing the company’s premarket tobacco product applications, the FDA determined that the applications lacked sufficient evidence regarding the toxicological profile of the products to demonstrate that marketing of the products would be appropriate for the protection of the public health.

    In particular, some of the company’s study findings raised concerns due to insufficient and conflicting data—including regarding genotoxicity and potentially harmful chemicals leaching from the company’s proprietary e-liquid pods—that have not been adequately addressed and precluded the FDA from completing a full toxicological risk assessment of the products named in the company’s applications.

    Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, called the FDA decision “the most significant action the FDA has taken to reverse the youth e-cigarette epidemic. Juul, more than any other product or company, has been responsible for creating and fueling the youth e-cigarette epidemic.”

    The FDA says that, to date, it has not received clinical information to suggest an immediate hazard associated with the use of the Juul device or Juul pods. However, the MDOs issued today reflect FDA’s determination that there is insufficient evidence to assess the potential toxicological risks of using the Juul products.

    “There is also no way to know the potential harms from using other authorized or unauthorized third-party e-liquid pods with the Juul device or using Juul pods with a non-Juul device,” the agency wrote in a statement.

    “The FDA is tasked with ensuring that tobacco products sold in this country meet the standard set by the law, but the responsibility to demonstrate that a product meets those standards ultimately falls on the shoulders of the company,” said Michele Mital, acting director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products. “As with all manufacturers, Juul had the opportunity to provide evidence demonstrating that the marketing of their products meets these standards. However, the company did not provide that evidence and instead left us with significant questions. Without the data needed to determine relevant health risks, the FDA is issuing these marketing denial orders.”

    Gregory Conley, president of the American Vaping Association, asserted on Twitter that the Juul decisions were “manufactured” and “complete nonsense.”

    Andrew Bagley is the owner of the Illuminati Smoke Shop in Columbia, South Carolina, and says even with the popularity of Juul, he doesn’t have concerns about the ban’s effect on sales, reports News19.

    “I’m not concerned,” he said. “We have quite a few other vape products that are PMTA approved, which just means at this point we are legally allowed to sell them and Juuls were a very small percent of our sales, it’s not that big of a deal.”

  • Feelm Commits to Carbon Disclosure Project

    Feelm Commits to Carbon Disclosure Project

    Photo: Feelm

    Feelm has joined the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), as part of the listing of its parent company, Smoore.

    CDP is an independent not-for-profit organization that manages a global disclosure system and repository for environmental reporting by corporations, municipalities and organizations around the world.

    In 2021, more than 680 financial institutions, representing $130 trillion in assets, supported CDP’s request for data sharing, while over 13,000 companies, accounting for 64 percent of the world’s market capital, disclosed through CDP’s database. Phillip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Japan Tobacco International, Altria Group and Imperial Tobacco also take part in the CDP.

    In May 2022, Feelm announced its commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, with a strategic executive plan that includes introducing zero-carbon vape technology solutions, adopting eco-friendly materials and green packaging, supporting the global supply chain in de-carbonization and activating a recycling program of vape pod cartridges and devices with clients.

    “Carbon neutrality is an important component of our integrated ESG strategic plan as it helps to accelerate our business transformation, said Sofia Luo, marketing director of Feelm’s business division, in a statement.

    “That is why Feelm follows the measures and roadmap outlined in the ‘Corporate Net-zero Pathway’ published by the UN in 2021. Feelm will press ahead with its commitment to comply with UN standards, disclose information transparently, and welcome scrutiny from international organizations and the public; in order to reach our vision of developing an eco-friendly and low-carbon economy.”

  • Medad Pioneers Ultrasound Water Pipe for Shisha

    Medad Pioneers Ultrasound Water Pipe for Shisha

    Image: Studio217

    Medad Technology has developed a shisha pipe that it says is less harmful to health than traditional hookah, reports The National.

    Unveiled at the recent World Vape Show in Dubai, the company’s Nesta pipe delivers a nicotine hit via ultrasonic vibrations, which could cut cancer risk from inhaling toxic fumes, according to Medad Technology.

    The device’s patented algorithm reportedly produces mist droplets containing nicotine that are evenly distributed as they are inhaled.

    Misting is distinct from vaping as it uses ultrasound technology rather than heat. The absence of charcoal and tobacco means the product generates none of the harmful carbon emissions or toxic fumes that are usually inhaled by users of traditional hookah pipes, according to the company.

    “The challenge was to develop real, alternative products that were safer than shisha and e-cigarettes, not categorized under vaping, so a completely new product,” Medad Holding CEO Mohammed Al Mazrouei was quoted as saying.

    The device has been approved by the European Union Medical Agency and by the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, according to Medad Holding.  

    It is under review by UAE authorities. The company is planning to also apply for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    An estimated 100 million people use shisha, or similar water pipes, on a daily basis around the world.

     

  • Juul Expected to be Pulled From Market Soon

    Juul Expected to be Pulled From Market Soon

    Let the shock settle in. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is preparing to order Juul Labs to take its e-cigarettes off the market in the United States, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.

    Todd Cecil, deputy director for the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products’ Office of Science, told Vapor Voice during the Next Generation Nicotine Delivery seminar in Miami that he could not make a comment on the Juul decision until the FDA formerly issues a marketing denial order (MDO).

    The news sent Altria’s stock (MO) on a massive drop, falling more than 10 percent once the news broke.

    Wells Fargo analyst Bonnie Herzog wrote in an email that while the news comes as a bit of a surprise, she doesn’t believe all is lost for Altria and the company has several options it can pursue, adding that the sell-off today is overdone with the stock having lost an estimated $7 billion of market capital.

    “First, assuming the FDA does in fact issue an MDO for Juul, we believe the impact is far from certain given Juul’s likely options to appeal or challenge it (via a court decision similar to Kaival Brands’ approach for Bidi Vapor Sticks and IMB’s use of the appeals process for myblu), revise its [premarket tobacco product application] PMTA application, or sue the FDA altogether,” wrote Herzog. “Also, with no detail yet on the FDA’s rationale, it is tough to know how the agency is thinking about an MDO on Juul in the context of its broader efforts to encourage adult smokers to quit and/or move down the continuum of risk to less harmful alternatives (e.g., e-vapor, heat-not-burn, oral nicotine pouches, etc) especially given Juul’s critical leadership in e-cigs.

    “While it is unclear how the FDA is thinking about the remaining PMTAs that are pending (especially the popular VUSE Alto line), we have a hard time imagining the FDA would categorically remove highly popular e-cig brands without ensuring a suitable off-ramp for users (that isn’t back to combustible cigs).”

    It is expected that Juul will receive the MDO in a response to its PMTA because of its product’s potential to appeal to youth. The company has also seen a slump in sales recently, and has been taken over by RJ Reynolds Vapor Company’s Vuse brand e-cigarette in Nielsen rankings for the last two quarters.

    “We expect the company to appeal, with the products remaining on the market,” Vivien Azer, managing director for cannabis, consumer beverages and tobacco at Cowen Inc., New York, said in a research note.

    George Cassels-Smith, CEO of Tobacco Technologies, says Juul receiving an MDO is ridiculous. “For a company that has that has been a standard in this industry and has some of the highest quality products on the market, its shocking,” he said. “The company has tried hard to move past its early issues of appealing to youth. This isn’t appropriate for the protection of public health and it isn’t good for the industry. It hurts adult smokers because Juul is a product that is successful in helping smokers switch.”

    The decision is likely celebrated by some anti-nicotine groups who say Juul is the cause of the rise in teen vaping. That rise has also declined dramatically over the last 2-3 years. Recently, Juul Labs also settled several lawsuits related to youth marketing. Juul Labs — until recently the market leader in e-cigarette product sales — admitted to no wrongdoing in any of its settlements.

    Tony Abboud, executive director of the Vapor Technology Association (VTA) said that he was surprised by the news because Juul was always expected to get an approval order.

    “The reported denial of Juul’s PMTA application is stunning. While the company has certainly been at the epicenter of conflict, the amount of rigorous, peer reviewed science supporting their products’ ability to help smokers quit, raises serious questions about the FDA’s subjective balancing test, and whether public pressure campaigns will steer science policy,” said Abboud.

    Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) strongly condemned the decision. Tim Andrews, ATR’s director of consumer issues, said the Juul MDO will devastate public health across the country, and lead to easily preventable deaths.

    “Juul’s reduced risk tobacco alternatives are critical tools of smoking cessation that have been proven to help cigarette smokers across the U.S. save their lives through transitioning away from deadly combustible tobacco,” he said. ““This is a decision grounded in ideology, not science. It is a decision that will cause countless deaths that could have otherwise been prevented. For the sake of public health, it is a decision we hope will be overturned in the courts on appeal.”

    In 2018, Altria spent nearly $13 billion taking a 35 percent stake in Juul. The company has taken non-cash charges on the investment as regulatory scrutiny of Juul and its marketing practices have impacted sales. As of March 31, Altria said the estimated fair value of its investment in Juul was $1.6 billion.

    In 2019, Juul Labs announced it was suspending its print, broadcast and online advertising in the United States. That same year it halted the sale of its fruit and dessert flavors — including mango, creme brulee and cucumber — that were seen as a significant lure for teen users. The FDA also recently instituted a proposed rule to place a ban on menthol combustible cigarettes and flavored cigars. The menthol ban will not yet cover next-generation tobacco products, such as e-cigarettes, but the FDA has the authority to include them if it sees fit.

    Juul Labs submitted its PMTAs in July 2020. At the time, the company said its submission included comprehensive scientific evidence for the Juul device and Juul pods in Virginia Tobacco and Menthol flavors at nicotine concentrations of 5.0 percent and 3.0 percent, as well as information on its data-driven measures to address underage use of its products.

    Juul will not join NJOY as the only FDA-approved closed system, pod-style vaping device. The FDA is expected to make decisions on additional vaping brands that submitted timely PMTAs soon.

    Now that at the FDA has approved a quality vaping product in Njoy, many tobacco harm reduction groups are hoping the FDA publicly clarifies that vaping is a less risky alternative to smoking combustible. A recent Rutgers University study found that more than 60 percent of all doctors incorrectly believe all tobacco products are equally harmful, making them less likely to recommend e-cigarettes for people trying to quit smoking.

  • Sweden: Lawmakers Reject Vapor Flavor Ban

    Sweden: Lawmakers Reject Vapor Flavor Ban

    Photo: WDnet Studio

    Sweden’s Parliament, the Riksdag, rejected a ban on sales of flavored vaping products, with 177 lawmakers voting against the proposal and 126 lawmakers voting in favor, reports Vaping360.

    Introduced by the government’s Ministry of Social Affairs in late February, the new rules would have taken effect next January, and would have prohibited flavors other than tobacco in all e-liquid, including zero-nicotine vape juice.

    In rejecting the proposal, lawmakers heeded the advice of the Riksdag’s social affairs committee, which had recommended adopting proposed regulations for nicotine pouches and synthetic nicotine but eliminating the flavor ban.

    Seven other European countries have banned non-tobacco vape flavors. In Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Hungary and Ukraine, flavored vape restrictions are currently in place. Lithuania’s flavor ban will take effect July 1. In the Netherlands, the flavor prohibition scheduled to begin in July has been postponed until January 2023.

    No European country has banned vaping products outright.

  • Canada Proposes New Vapor Disclosure Requirements

    Canada Proposes New Vapor Disclosure Requirements

    Photo: DD Images

    The Canadian government wants vapor product manufacturers to disclose information about their sales  and the ingredients used in their products.

    On June 17, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health Carolyn Bennett announced the launch of a 45-day public consultation period on the proposed rules.

    “Canada’s vaping market is evolving rapidly,” Health Canada wrote in a press release. “A large number of vaping substances are available across the country and new formulations are frequently introduced with new flavors. Health Canada is restricted in its capacity to properly track market trends due to limited access to information on vaping products sales and composition.”

    According to Health Canada, the proposed regulations are the first step of a gradual approach to introducing vaping product reporting requirements. Health Canada is considering additional reporting requirements for implementation in the future similar to those already in place for tobacco products. This could include reporting on information related to research and development as well as promotional activities. It could also include disclosing some information to the public which would increase industry transparency.

    “As the vaping market continues to evolve rapidly and entice Canadians, including young people, to use vaping products, we are taking action to better protect everyone in Canada by more fully understanding the impact of these products on their health,” said Bennett. “The proposed regulations will help us educate Canadians about the health harms while furthering research aimed at reducing the amount of people impacted by harms related to tobacco and vaping product use across the country.” 

    The proposed regulations have been published in the Canada Gazette. Stakeholders can submit comments to mailto:mpregs@hc-sc.gc.ca until Aug. 2.

  • Senator Durbin Continues Cries to FDA Over PMTAs

    Senator Durbin Continues Cries to FDA Over PMTAs

    Dick Durbin
    Credit: Durbin.gov

    U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin today met virtually with six public health organizations regarding what he calls a failure of the U.S Food and Drug Administration to fulfill its obligation to regulate e-cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act.

    In 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland mandated that FDA finalize its premarket tobacco product applications under review by September 9, 2021.

    As FDA has delayed for more than nine months past that deadline on finalizing its reviews.

    During his meeting with these health groups, Durbin discussed his recent statement for FDA Commissioner Robert Califf to “immediately clear the market of unauthorized, kid-friendly e-cigarettes or step aside,” according to River Bender.

    “We know that kids are getting hooked on these flavored e-cigarettes that are specifically targeted to children, like JUUL. Yet FDA has decided to cower to Big Tobacco and ignore the addiction of children as the agency wrings its hands over e-cigarette applications,” said Durbin.

    “I’m grateful for the leadership of these health organizations, and together, we will do our best to ensure there is responsible, active leadership at FDA that will take the issue of nicotine addiction seriously.”

  • Pennsylvania Court Overturns THC Vape Recall

    Pennsylvania Court Overturns THC Vape Recall

    Credit: J Zehnder

    Marijuana vapes are again legal in Pennsylvania.

    A Commonwealth Court judge on Wednesday allowed Pennsylvania medical marijuana companies to resume selling vapes that were taken off the shelves in February in a controversial recall. The state is expected to appeal the ruling.

    “We are thrilled about this decision,” said Judith D. Cassel, an attorney for a group of cannabis companies that sued state regulators in February, alleging that the recall was unfounded, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

    “The vapes can go immediately back on the shelves and the grower processors can continue or commence producing these vapes,” said Cassel, a partner at Hawke McKeon & Sniscak LLP in Harrisburg.

    The ruling is a blow to the Pennsylvania Department of Health, which in February mandated a massive recall and ban of 670 types of cannabis concentrates for vaping — 330,000 units — that they had previously approved for sale in Pennsylvania’s more than 150 marijuana dispensaries