Tag: e-cigarettes

  • Simply Perfect

    Simply Perfect

    Numerous small changes come together in possibly the most reliable and consistent pod system ever created.

    By Mike Huml

    The FEELM Air pod system from Smoore boasts a plethora of groundbreaking innovations. From safety to performance, the FEELM Air comes with a laundry list of improvements over past iterations of pod systems. As the largest vapor manufacturer in the world, Smoore has poured resources into refinement of its technologies to produce a near-perfect pod system.

    The FEELM Air is a closed pod system, so each 2 mL pod is disposable. The pods are held in the battery section with strong magnets, and there truly isn’t much more to speak of concerning operation. The simplicity is a huge benefit for those who are seeking a no-hassle vape experience. There is no airflow adjustment, no power adjustments and no buttons whatsoever. The FEELM Air is activated by airflow to more closely replicate the sensation of smoking.

    Further, Smoore has incorporated the “world’s smallest linear motor,” which not only provides haptic feedback when a pod is connected or disconnected but also vibrates throughout each drag. This acts as confirmation that the pod is firing since there is no button to press but also gives a more turbulent feel to each drag that anyone accustomed to smoking will be familiar with. Dubbed “shockwave mode,” the vibration feature only consumes power equivalent to two puffs throughout a single battery charge cycle. While shockwave mode may be convenient for some, the vibration is sure to turn some people off, and as such, it would have been prudent for Smoore to incorporate an inconspicuous touch-sensitive button to toggle shockwave mode on and off.

    Aside from the inability to disable shockwave mode, the FEELM Air has no other issues and offers quite a bit in the way of innovation and refinement. At 7.8 mm, it’s the thinnest pod system available, making it great for taking out and about. It fits in pockets and pocketbooks easily, and it never leaks thanks to further improvements in the pod structure. Smoore uses “puzzle leakage-proof technology” and an absorption layer within the heating element to eliminate leaking.

    The juice flow channels are narrow enough that surface tension keeps condensation from backing up, and the absorption layer re-wicks the liquid back into the ceramic heating element. It works extremely well as the FEELM Air doesn’t leak when stored or stowed, doesn’t cause spitback even when multiple drags are taken in rapid succession and never produces dry hits due to slow wicking. By Smoore’s estimation, this design reduces leaking of any kind by 237 percent.

    The battery life of the FEELM Air is good and lasts through approximately half of a single 2 mL pod. By only firing at or around 6 watts, a smaller, thinner battery is adequate. The device is charged with an included USB-C cable that is capable of fully charging the battery in about 15 minutes. Additionally, the FEELM Air can be used while it’s charging, reducing the already low downtime to near zero. A constant power output of 6 watts may seem a bit weak, but thanks to the design of the heating element, it produces vapor equivalent to other pod systems that fire between 12 watts and 15 watts.

    Each heating element comprises seven different layers, each for a different purpose. In short, the heating element in each pod improves flavor, efficiency, safety, consistency and leakiness. Lower power, a more efficient heating element and a more uniform heating surface reduce exposure to heavy metals, ketones and aldehydes by 80 percent. A separate layer uses Smoore’s “flavor-lock” technology to increase flavor release by 33 percent. The smaller vapor particles produced by the ceramic heating element are also conducive to more efficient nicotine absorption, so each pod lasts a bit longer.

    It’s clear that Smoore has put significant resources toward improving the vaping experience provided by its pod systems, but how does it affect the end user? After all, heavily marketed features don’t always translate to better products. In the case of the FEELM Air, there is definitely a marked improvement in consistency over many other pod systems, but given the nature of innovation and refinement, don’t expect mind-blowing improvements to the established order. The improvements are subtle but effective, and the FEELM Air may be the most user-friendly device currently available, particularly for those with absolutely no knowledge of vaping.

    Case in point: There is a lot of literature pertaining to the “three innovations” and “seven breakthroughs” implemented in the design and creation of the FEELM Air. A new film designed for the heating element is 40 times thinner than that of the previous generation. The new ceramic coil is also 30 percent thinner. Seven layers of composite heating film are made from medical-grade materials and are created using a nanoscale vacuumed film-forming technique to produce a microporous bionic structure.

    The seven-layer heating element includes a nanoscale protection layer, a microporous flavor lock layer, a nano silver electro layer, a superabsorbent lock layer, a precise composite heating layer, a temperature control layer and a porous thermal resistance layer. These layers in tandem with the upgraded capillary structure incorporated into the pod itself contribute to the aforementioned reduced leakage and improved consistency. What does all of this actually mean?—It vapes good.

    However, even given the above information and more, there are still a few unknowns. What is the battery capacity? What is the nicotine strength of the e-liquid? Even with a lot of marketing, some basic information is omitted—but this is information only an experienced vaper would value. A new user probably wouldn’t care that the FEELM Air has a 100 mAh battery while Pod System B uses a 150 mAh battery.

    How does one measure “flavor release” to determine that it’s increased by 30 percent? And why would that matter for a pod that can’t be refilled? Will Smoore produce less expensive pods due to not needing as much flavor extract, or will the flavor be stronger than usual due to this flavor increase while the same e-liquid is used? How many of the claims benefit the industry or the user, and how many are just big words to use as filler for a brochure? With all the apparent detail provided, it’s suspicious that basic information was left out—or at least it would be if the FEELM Air was a poor product.

    Whatever Smoore is doing, it’s working because the FEELM Air is probably the most consistent pod system currently available. After significant usage, there was no spitback, no misfires, no leaking, no dry hits and no kind of any other issue. Each subsequent drag was identical to the previous one, and the flavor was admittedly good. It wasn’t leaps and bounds beyond other pod systems, but it was consistent, voluminous and flavorful enough.

    Operation couldn’t be simpler or more straightforward. Perhaps the reason for the lack of information that vapers are used to having access to (such as battery capacity) isn’t needed. For someone brand new to vaping, the FEELM Air requires virtually no explanation. Insert the pod; start vaping. Plug it in when the battery dies, and replace the pod when it’s empty. There’s no fiddling, no settings, no troubleshooting problems. It’s simple, and it works consistently.

    While the marketing for the FEELM Air seems a bit excessive and overly technical, Smoore clearly wants the industry and consumers to know the nature of the work they’ve been doing to improve the vaping experience and safety. Just the peace of mind brought about by knowing that the efficient, 6 watt output and seven-layer heating element are working to further reduce any harm caused by vaping or technical shortcomings may be enough to make the sale. The diminutive size is also a huge positive, but the vibration feature borders on gimmicky rather than useful.

    Tactile confirmation of automatic switch activation may provide an extra layer of protection against accidental firing, but that’s largely a solution to a problem that hasn’t existed in any meaningful way since 2010 when automatic switches would fire if music was played too loudly. Still, it’s a small complaint considering that the package as a whole is providing one of the best vape experiences for a pod system on the market.

    The FEELM Air from Smoore takes refinement to a new level. A multitude of small changes come together to provide possibly the most reliable and consistent pod system ever created. While everyday use won’t knock anybody’s socks off with massive clouds or tear-jerking flavor, it’s definitely among the best options for new users and smoking converts. As the vapor industry delves deeper into the era of refinement, these sorts of innovations will become commonplace. The average user won’t necessarily care about what each of the seven layers in the heating element actually do, but everyone will benefit from more consistency and, therefore, safety.

  • Dragbar 600S Launches, Offers a ‘More Balanced Taste’

    Dragbar 600S Launches, Offers a ‘More Balanced Taste’

    The latest in disposable vaping, the ZOVOO Dragbar 600S, was unveiled and officially entered the market on May, 9. In a press release sent to Vapor Voice, the company states that the new device is equipped with an upgraded design of five flower-shaped air inlets, which allows for a more evenly distributed airflow. This creates a more comfortable and balanced taste experience.

    “Without sacrificing user experience or changing external dimensions, it optimizes the internal space structure of the atomizing rod and enlarges the battery capacity to 500 mAh for durability. This new product delivers enormous value in addition to excellent daily experience,” according to the release.

    The first offerings of the Dragbar 600s includes 10 mouthwatering flavors, including strawberry ice, peach ice and O.M.G. In addition, 10 new flavors will be available at a future date.

    “Quality and taste are the core to impress consumers and the soul of electronic atomizers. ZOVOO always adheres to the concept of ‘user-focus’ and constantly develops new disposable vapes to meet the ultimate needs of users all over the world,” according to the release.

  • Jamaica Set to Consider Passing Tobacco, Vaping Rules

    Jamaica Set to Consider Passing Tobacco, Vaping Rules

    Credit: Zabanski

    Jamaica is set to consider comprehensive legislation in the House of Representatives that would address the devastating effects of tobacco and e-cigarette consumption in Jamaica, Minister of Health and Wellness, Christopher Tufton said.

    The Tobacco Control 2020 Bill will, among other things, impose restrictions on the marketing of vaping and other tobacco products as well as prohibit sales to children, according to Tufton.

    Tufton said the legislation is now at the committee stage “and I am happy to report that we are well advanced in that process,” according to Caribbean National Weekly.

    “I expect over the next month, six weeks maybe, to table the comprehensive Bill, and I urge my colleagues to quickly pass this bill for the protection of the Jamaican people and to reduce the cost of treatment,” he said.

    Outlining some of the provisions of the Bill, Tufton informed that in addition to curtailing the marketing of tobacco products and prohibiting sales to children, it will also prohibit the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems such as e-cigarettes in public spaces.

    More Jamaicans are embracing vaping to help quit combustible products, according to vape shop owners on the island.

  • Connecticut Flavor Ban Bill Fails for 3rd Year in a Row

    Connecticut Flavor Ban Bill Fails for 3rd Year in a Row

    Credit: Sharaf Maksumov

    For the third year in a row, an effort to ban flavored vaping products in Connecticut couldn’t muster enough support.

    “We’re incredibly frustrated that the legislature can’t seem to get their priorities in order in a way that would protect kids, the way all of Connecticut’s neighbors already have,” said Kevin O’Flaherty, northeast advocacy director for the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. They “continue to support industry and industry profits instead of protecting kids.”

    The flavor ban had early momentum in the General Assembly. The Public Health Committee approved the measure in March after hearing hours of testimony, according to CT Mirror.

    Connecticut is one of few states in the region that has not adopted a prohibition on flavored e-cigarettes. New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island have barred the sale of flavored vaping products. Massachusetts banned all flavored tobacco items, including flavored cigars, cigarettes and vaping goods.

    The state has attempted a ban twice before. The proposal was raised in 2020 as part of Gov. Ned Lamont’s budget but was unsuccessful. Lamont had recommended banning flavored vaping products and increasing the tax on all e-cigarette liquids.

    Last year, a bill barring the sale of flavored cigarettes, tobacco products and e-cigarettes was watered down and then shelved. A version of the plan was also added to the state budget implementer but was scrapped.

    This year’s version only targeted the sale of flavored vaping products (not flavored cigarettes or cigars). But it still ran into opposition. E-cigarette makers, store owners and people who say that vaping is an important alternative for those who are quitting smoking testified against the bill.

  • Malaysia Vape Industry Players Want Regulations to Begin

    Malaysia Vape Industry Players Want Regulations to Begin

    Credit: Krzysztof Wiktor

    In order to avoid a total ban vaping products, some Malaysian vaping industry players are urging the government to implement long-delayed regulations for the industry.

    The Malaysia Retail Electronic Cigarette Association (MRECA) president Datuk Adzwan Ab Manas, in a statement, said a taxation framework for e-liquids with nicotine was supposed to be implemented from Jan. 1 this year, but has been delayed for four months because the Ministry of Health (MoH) still has not implemented regulations for the industry.

    The delay has not only left the industry in limbo but has resulted in the government listing more than RM750 million ($172 million) a year in tax revenue, according to the Malay Mail.

    “Furthermore, the MoH’s proposal to ban the sale of vape along with cigarettes, although the two products are different, is akin to declaring war on the local vape industry especially for the 3,000 local entrepreneurs and 15,000 employees in the industry,” Ab Manas said.

    The president of the Malaysian Vape Industry Advocacy (MIVA), Rizani Zakaria, agrees with Adzwan. Zakaria said the ban is unfair as vape and cigarettes are two very different products.

    Rizani was reported saying international studies show vaping is less harmful and can be used to help cigarette smokers quit smoking.

  • Colorado Flavor Ban Heads to Senate After House Win

    Colorado Flavor Ban Heads to Senate After House Win

    Credit Renan

    After months of debates and amending, Colorado’s House passed a ban on flavored vaping and other tobacco products this week. The bill passed 35-27 on Wednesday after the appropriations committee approved it earlier in the day on a 7-4 vote.

    That ban will not apply to the sale of premium cigars after they were given an exemption during the debate process, as was pipe tobacco and hookah products.

    The bill now goes to the state Senate. Even with the session end looming, one of its co-sponsors, state Sen. Rhonda Fields said she was optimistic, according to Colorado Public Radio.

    “You know, it looks great. It’s on its way to the Senate, and then we’ll make sure it goes through all the appropriate committees and I’m looking forward to debating it,” said Fields.

    Opponents say a ban would hurt convenience stores and vape shops and have argued the issue is one of personal choice.

    For Fields, she said it’s about the toll tobacco consumption, driven by attractive flavors like menthol, has taken on the community. 

    “It started back in the ’60s, (the brand) Kool Cigarettes, all these menthol flavors,” she said. “The industry has now put flavors into vaping, into cigarettes to make it more attractive for young people to start smoking early.”

    The measure, HB22-1064, bans retailers of cigarettes, tobacco or nicotine products from selling or marketing any flavored product. Those are defined as products “imparting a taste or smell other than the taste or smell of tobacco.”

     

  • Utah Schools Join Juul Labs Class Action Suit

    Utah Schools Join Juul Labs Class Action Suit

    Credit: Steheap

    Nearly every school district in the state of Utah joined a mass tort lawsuit against Juul Labs. Park City Schools is the only Utah school district not participating in the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit claims Juul Labs was deliberately using youthful marketing strategies. The lawsuit also claims the company misrepresents and fails to mention that its e-cigarettes are “more potent or addictive” than cigarettes, according to KUTV.

    Juul Labs removed all flavors other than tobacco, mint and menthol from their offerings in 2019 after federal regulators accused the vape maker of using the flavors to lure minors to vape. That same year, the company announced it was suspending its print, broadcast and online advertising in the United States.

    The Frantz Law Group of California has filed the mass tort lawsuit on behalf of 700 school districts across the country. Salt Lake City law firm Kirton McConkie will head up the Utah portion of the lawsuit. Attorney Jim Frantz and William Shinoff say Juul Labs directly marketed to minors, “because we’re dealing directly with minors, and undermining them and addicting them and that’s really as low as you can go,” says Frantz.

  • Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate E-Cigarette Policy Proposals

    Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate E-Cigarette Policy Proposals

    Credit: Andriano_cz

    A demonstrative policy debate event on whether e-cigarettes should be regulated was held on March 8, 2022, in Taipei, showing how different public policy viewpoints can be rationally discussed, according to The Taipei Times. The debate was held by the Chinese Debate Promotion Association (CDPA) at the Taipei NGO House.

    CDPA Chairman and Founder Chia Pei-te said that the Executive Yuan in January approved a draft amendment to the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act proposed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for legislative review. The proposed regulations on emerging tobacco products have sparked discussions, he said.

    The amendment would classify emerging tobacco products as “tobacco-like products” and “designated tobacco products.” E-cigarettes would be classified as “tobacco-like products” and be fully banned while heated-tobacco products would be classified as “designated tobacco products” and be subject to regulation.

    The reasoning behind banning e-cigarettes includes keeping curious teenagers away from the products, preventing consumers from adding nicotine to e-cigarette e-liquids and lowering the risk of teenage users turning to smoking.

    The debate participants went back and forth discussing the pros and cons of regulating e-cigarettes versus banning them, bringing up subjects such as public health, tax revenue options and teenage use.

    National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Dean Kang Jaw-jou said that he was moved by opinions for and against e-cigarettes. He said the affirmative side proposed to directly manage e-cigarette use through regulations and an approval system while the opposing side stressed their attitude to life—banning a substance if the public consensus deems it harmful to society.

    Many aspects of the topic can be argued, but e-cigarettes can cause negative health effects, and supporters and opponents must clearly present this fact to the public in further discussions, stated Wang Hsiang-tsui, NYCU Faculty of Pharmacy associate professor.

  • China’s New Vapor Rules Could Have Global Fallout

    China’s New Vapor Rules Could Have Global Fallout

    China’s recently announced intention to regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products will reverberate around the world, according to an analyses published on Keller And Heckman’s The Continuum of Risk blog.

    On Nov. 26, 2021, China’s State Council announced it would amend the country’s tobacco monopoly law to subject e-cigarettes to the same requirements as traditional cigarettes. On Dec. 2, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) published on its website the draft management rules for e-cigarettes for public comment.

    The draft rules define “e-cigarette” as an electronic delivery product that produces nicotine-containing aerosol for human inhalation. The definition does not include heat-not-burn tobacco products, which are already regulated as combustible cigarettes in China, according to Keller and Heckman. The draft rules make clear that e-cigarettes should be regulated like tobacco products by STMA and its local agencies and provide that e-cigarettes must comply with the e-cigarette national standard.

    Among other things, e-cigarettes will be subject to premarket registration upon a safety review by the STMA under the draft rules. Producers and sellers of e-cigarettes in China must obtain the same tobacco monopoly licenses as traditional cigarette manufacturers. In addition, all vapor product companies will be required to trade on a national e-cigarette platform to be set up by the SMTA. The draft rules also contain requirements to protect minors such as age-restrictions and warning labels.

    Because the draft rules’ registration and production licensing requirements apply to all e-cigarette manufacturers operating in China, they will also impact products sold abroad. China manufactures more than 95 percent of the world’s e-cigarette hardware.

    In 2019, China notified the World Trade Organization about its first national standard on e-cigarettes, which covers raw materials, technical requirements, testing methods and labeling, among other topics. On Nov .30, 3021, China published updated draft of the standard for comment.

    According to Keller and Heckman, the STMA plans to implement the standard “three to five months after its publication.”

    During the transition period, existing enterprises can continue manufacturing and operational activities. However, investors are banned from investing in new e-cigarette enterprises; existing e-cigarette production and operation entities must refrain from constructing or expanding production capacity, and they may not establish new e-cigarette retail outlets and market new products. “New import of e-cigarettes” will also be suspended during this period.

    The public comment period for the draft management rules closes on Dec. 17, 2021, 15 days after its publication, and the public comment period for the draft standard closes on Jan. 29, 2022.

  • Malaysia to Table Bill Regulating Vape, Tobacco

    Malaysia to Table Bill Regulating Vape, Tobacco

    Malaysia’s health ministry stated that a bill on the regulation of tobacco, e-cigarettes, vape and shisha will be tabled in the Dewan Rakyat, the lower house of the bicameral Parliament, the federal legislature of Malaysia, next year.

    Malaysia
    Credit: Peter Nguyen

    It could be tabled in the first term at the latest, according to Free Malaysia Today. The ministry confirmed this in a written reply to Shahrudidn Md Salleh (Pejuang-Sri Gading), who asked about the status of the bill that was supposed to be tabled last year.

    In the reply yesterday, it said the bill, which was first drafted in 2016, had been sent to the Attorney-General’s Chambers in August 2019 to be enacted but was later returned to the ministry due to changes in the government. The ministry said the bill will pave the way for comprehensive regulation of conventional tobacco products and new e-cigarettes and other vaping products.

    It also said it had applied for a date to the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister’s Department to table the bill.