Tag: FDA

  • Puff Bar Tests FDA Power Over Tobacco-Free Nicotine

    Puff Bar Tests FDA Power Over Tobacco-Free Nicotine

    In July 2020, Puff Bar announced that it would cease all online sales and distribution in the U.S. until further notice. However, the brand resumed sales on its website last month with a changed product. To get around the ban, Puff Bar is now using tobacco-free nicotine, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    puff bar
    Credit: Puff Bar

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has started investigating Puff Bar’s redesigned fruit-flavored disposable vaporizers because of the changes, reports The Hill. The regulatory agency said it was aware of Puff Bar’s actions but would not say whether the agency’s ban was still applicable, citing the ongoing investigation.

    In mid-2020, the FDA told Puff Bar to stop selling its fruity vaporizers as part of a broader crackdown on underage vaping. In a letter to Puff Bar, the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products said Puff Bar products hadn’t been authorized for sale by the agency and that the company had made unauthorized claims on its website that its vaporizers were less harmful than traditional cigarettes.

    In early 2020, the Trump administration banned fruity flavored e-cigarettes in reusable devices like Juul, the blockbuster brand that helped trigger the teen vaping craze in the U.S. Under that policy, only menthol and tobacco flavors were allowed for those devices. But the flavor ban did not apply to disposable vaping products like Puff Bar, which is offered in more than 20 flavors, including pina colada and pink lemonade.

    Following the ban, Puff Bar quickly emerged as the vape of choice among young people. Puff Bar has fallen to No. 3 in the disposable category this year, after Bidi Stick and Blu, according to Nielsen data.

    It’s unclear who owns Puff Bar. Previous owners include Cool Clouds Distribution in California and DS Technology Licensing in China.

  • U.S. FDA Sends Another Round of Warning Letters

    U.S. FDA Sends Another Round of Warning Letters

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warning letters to 18 manufacturers selling unauthorized e-liquids. The companies did not submit premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) by the Sept. 9, 2020, deadline. It’s the second time in February 2021 that the agency has sent warning letters for illegal e-liquids.

    peanut butter crunch e-liquid bottle
    Peanut Butter Crunch Time from California Vaping Co.

    The companies that received warning letters include Square Vape Labs, The Vapor Emporium, Tally Ho Vapor Tonic, The Vape Corner., Dripco d/b/a Dripco Vape Co., VaporIce, Vapor Maven E-Juice, Vapor City Plus, Vapor Invasion, Vaporatory, Chuckin’ Clouds Vape Shop, Black Dog Reserve, California Vaping Company, The Chubby Baker, Smooth, Bulldog Vapor, Adore eLiquid and E-Cig Outlet.

    While each warning letter issued cites specific products as examples, collectively these companies have listed a combined total of more than 234,000 products with the FDA.

    Per a court order, applications for premarket review for certain deemed new tobacco products on the market as of Aug. 8, 2016—including e-liquids—were required to be submitted to the FDA by Sept. 9, 2020. For companies that submitted applications by that deadline, the FDA generally intends to continue to defer enforcement for up to one year pending review unless there is a negative action taken by the FDA on the application.

    The FDA recently published an update on its progress on the processing and review of the applications received by Sept. 9, including a list of companies that submitted timely applications.

  • Bidi Vapor PMTA Moves to Substantive Review Phase

    Bidi Vapor PMTA Moves to Substantive Review Phase

    Kaival Brands Innovations Group, the global distributor of all Bidi Vapor products, announced its premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) has moved the substantive review phase of the regulatory process. Bidi’s disposable e-cigarettes, Bidi Stick, comes in 11 flavor varieties, according to a press release.

    Substantive Review is where the scientific review of the U.S. FDA’s regulatory process is undertaken. The company received its acceptance letter, the first step, on Feb. 9. The FDA will determine if Bidi products meet the criteria for “appropriate for the protection of the public health” established in the Tobacco Control Act. The agency issues marketing orders that authorize the continued marketing and sale of products meeting the criteria.

    “Seeking an order for the continued marketing of Bidi Sticks in the United States is a long process. But it was always our goal to provide a premium vaping experience and an option to traditional, combustible tobacco that meets the needs of every adult smoker,” said Niraj Patel, the president and CEO of Kaival Brands. “This substantive review phase is where months of extensive information collection and hard work gathering together 285,000 pages of science-based evidence will pay off, as we continually put consumer health and the environment first.”

    Bidi Vapor also announced they have discontinued their online direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales through its website as of February 22, 2021. The company will allow sales through gopuff.com. “With a long history of distribution of alcoholic beverages, goPuff has pioneered a very stringent and dynamic compliance program and age-gating process,” the release states.

    “We are extremely excited to partner with one of the fastest growing and most secure online delivery services in the country,” stated Kaival Brands’ Chief Executive Officer, Niraj Patel. “More importantly, goPuff’s commitment to protecting minors and stringent procedural implementations will allow Kaival Brands to focus on our rapidly developing additional wholesaler distribution agreements.”

    While Kaival Brands will continue its business-to-business (B2B) online sales to retailers, it believes its decision to halt online DTC sales specifically through www.bidivapor.com will set an example for the industry and help reduce the larger problem of underage access to vaping devices. “The decision also bolsters its commitment to brick-and-mortar retail, which Kaival Brands believes to be a stronger age-verification distribution model than online sales,” the release states.

  • FDA ‘Public List’ of Products has Critical Flaws

    FDA ‘Public List’ of Products has Critical Flaws

    By Bryan Haynes, Troutman Pepper

    On February 16, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the long-awaited “public list” of “deemed” tobacco products that: (1) were on the US market on August 8, 2016, (2) are currently on the US market, and (3) were the subject of a request for marketing authorization submitted to FDA by September 9, 2020.

    The stated intent of the “public list” is to advise stakeholders of “deemed” tobacco products that can be legally sold in the United States. However, FDA’s approach to the list leaves critical gaps that, in many cases, fails to apprise stakeholders of unlawfully marketed products and, in other cases, fails to identify products that are lawfully marketed.

    The initial version of the list includes cigar, pipe tobacco and waterpipe tobacco products that were the subject of substantial equivalence (SE) or exemption from substantial equivalence (EXSE) applications filed by September 9, 2020. However, the list expressly does not include any submissions for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), apparently because FDA has not yet completed its intake review of the thousands of Premarket Tobacco Applications (PMTAs) submitted for ENDS products.

    This omission is striking, given what appears to be the plethora of ENDS products that are currently on the market and for which no PMTA was submitted by the manufacturer or importer. Although FDA has issued a few warning letters to sellers of these unauthorized products, it appears that these warning letters have only scratched the surface of unauthorized products.

    The “public list” is also underinclusive in that it does not contain “deemed” products that are grandfathered from the premarket review process. Under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, products sold in the US as of February 15, 2007 (and unchanged since then) are not subject to premarket review. There are thousands of grandfathered deemed products that are not subject to premarket review.

    Although FDA has published a separate database of products that have received standalone grandfather determinations, industry stakeholders are rightly concerned that distributors and retailers may conclude a product is not legally marketed if it does not appear on the “public list.” Distributors and retailers would need to separately consult the grandfather database, which is itself underinclusive because there are many grandfathered products that have not received formal FDA determinations.

    The “public list” is also underinclusive in that it does not contain “deemed” products that have actually received FDA marketing authorization. For that, stakeholders would need to consult separate databases of products that have received either SE, EXSE or PMTA marketing orders. However, those databases are not current. Indeed, to our knowledge, there are scores of deemed products that obtained FDA marketing authorization months ago, and those products have not been identified in any of FDA’s databases.

    The “public list” was ostensibly designed to be a tool for stakeholders to understand products that can, and cannot, be legally marketed in the United States. In order to better advise the public as to which products can legally be sold, FDA will need to expedite the inclusion of ENDS products on the list, as well as consider better ways to advise the public of products that are exempt from premarket review or that have obtained marketing authorization.

    The above opinion may not be the same as Vapor Voice or it’s staff. Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

    This article first appeared on tobaccolawblog.com.

  • U.S. FDA has Processed PMTAs for 4.8 Million Products

    U.S. FDA has Processed PMTAs for 4.8 Million Products

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it received thousands of premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) submissions covering millions of tobacco products, the majority of which came in very close to the Sept. 9, 2020 deadline. The submissions varied substantially in number of tobacco products contained in each submission, size, format and organization, including paper submissions and even hard drives and CDs, according to a press release.

    Mitch Zeller
    Mitch Zeller speaking at a TMA annual meeting. Photo: Taco Tuinstra

    FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) director Mitch Zeller stated as of mid-January 2021, the agency has completed the Processing step of applications for more than 4.8 million products from over 230 companies. “We have accepted applications for about 84,000 products and refused to accept applications for about 3,100 products submitted through the PMTA pathway,” wrote Zeller. “As of mid-January 2021, of the applications submitted by Sept. 9, we have filed applications for about 29,000 products and refused to file applications for about 1,650 products submitted through the PMTA pathway.”

    He also stated that several factors have slowed the agency’s progress in getting application’s into the system. Companies submitted PMTAs differently, for example some applicants provided information on one product per submission while other applicants provided information for all of the company’s products within one submission.

    “One firm submitted information on more than 4 million tobacco products within a single submission,” Zeller wrote. “The amount of content in each submission also greatly varied, with some applications including up to 2,000,000 files where each file contains multiple pages of content for FDA to review.” The letter is part of a pledge Zeller made that the agency would keep interested stakeholders updated on the agency’s progress.

    FDA is prioritizing enforcement against any ENDS product that continues to be sold and for which the agency did not receive a product application. To date, the FDA has sent warning letters to 30 firms who manufacture and operate websites selling electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products, specifically e-liquids, which lack premarket authorization, according to the letter.

    The agency also stated that the likelihood of FDA reviewing all the applications by Sept. 9, 2021 is low. Because of the sheer number of applications, the agency has set aside the products with the greatest market share and will push those products through the process more quickly. “[We will] focus resources on products where scientific review will have the greatest public health impact, based on their market share, while also committing to providing an opportunity for review to all companies,” Zeller wrote. This could prove positive or negative as a quick denial would force the product off the market.

    The agency can still not confirm when it would release a list of products that are approved to be on the market. Zeller wrote that the agency continues to work on processing submissions and verifying the dates of initial marketing and current marketing status of products that submitted a timely PMTA.

    “We have already verified this information for around 86,000 products received through the PMTA pathway,” he wrote. “Due to the size and volume of the PMTA submissions and the variable quality, format and presentation of these submissions, processing these submissions and verifying this information will take more time.”

     

  • FDA Received Over 15,000 PMTAs in FY2020

    FDA Received Over 15,000 PMTAs in FY2020

    Update: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it received thousands of premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) submissions covering millions of tobacco products, the majority of which came in very close to the Sept. 9, 2020 deadline. The submissions varied substantially in number of tobacco products contained in each submission, size, format and organization, according to a press release. 

    More than 15,000 premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA) were submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during fiscal year 2020, according to data provided on the regulatory agency’s website.fda

    In August 2020, the FDA received 10,184 applications and in September 2020 it received 4,567. Prior to August, the FDA had only received 686 applications. The FDA does not distinguish how many of those products are electronic nicotine-delivery system (ENDS) devices.

    Of the 15,437 applications turned in during fiscal year 2020 (October 2019 to September 2020), 767 PMTAs were closed, according to FDA data. An application is considered closed after the FDA issues an order letter, a refuse-to-accept letter or the PMTA is withdrawn by the applicant.

    Companies that submitted a PMTA by the Sept. 9, 2020 deadline and were previously on the market before Aug. 8, 2016, can remain on the market for up to one year while the FDA reviews the PMTA. The FDA said it will release a list of the deemed new tobacco products that were subject to the Sept. 9 PMTA deadline, however, no date has set for the list’s release.

  • Bidi Vapor Announces PMTA Acceptance Letter

    Bidi Vapor Announces PMTA Acceptance Letter

    After submitting its PMTA application to the U.S. FDA on Sept. 8, 2020, Bidi Vapor, the producer of the Bidi Stick closed system, announced yesterday that it had received a PMTA acceptance letter from the regulatory agency.

    “It has always been our goal to provide a premium vape experience as an option to traditional, combustible tobacco that meets the needs of every adult smoker, age 21 and older,” said Niraj Patel, the president and CEO of Bidi Vapor and Kaival Brands Innovations Group, global distributor of all Bidi brand products “We couldn’t be more pleased that we are one step further in achieving this goal.”

    The company now waits for a filing letter from the FDA. The Bidi Stick PMTAs would then move on to the Substantive Review phase where the scientific data is analyzed. The Bidi Stick, is the fastest-growing closed system vaping product in the U.S., based on Goldman Sachs’ equity research report on the Nielsen data for total nicotine volumes in 2020. Nielsen data showed the Bidi Stick as the second-largest disposable electronic nicotine-delivery system (ENDS) offering based on retail sales for previous 52-week period.

    The acceptance letter covers all 11 flavors in the Bidi Stick lineup. “Moving to the filing and, we anticipate, to the substantive review phase of the PMTA process is where our months of extensive data collection, investment and hard work assembling 285,000 pages of science-based evidence will pay off,” Patel said. “Receipt of the acceptance letter is a major step, as we await the FDA’s filing letter and then substantive review of our products.”

    The press release also states that the Bidi Stick is also the only adult-focused vape product on the market with an ecologically friendly, mass-recycling program. Kaival Brands also recently launched Bidi Vapor ‘s Bidi Pouch, a tobacco-free nicotine pouch.

  • Vapor Product C-Store Sales Up More Than 12 Percent

    Vapor Product C-Store Sales Up More Than 12 Percent

    E-cigarette sales continue to recover from a Covid-19 slump. Sales in C-stores are up 12.7 percent after rising 2.9 percent in the previous data release, according to the latest Nielsen convenience store report released last week. Nielsen does not track vape shop data.

    kangaroo gas station and store
    Credit: William Thompson

    Sales overall had slumped since February 2020, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration implemented its latest round of heightened regulations on the products, according to the Winston-Salem Journal. Overall e-cigarette sales-volume growth has declined steadily since Nielsen’s Aug. 10, 2019, report, when it was up 60.2 percent year over year.

    On Feb. 6, 2020, the FDA, among other things, required manufacturers of cartridge-based e-cigarettes, such as Juul Labs, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., NJoy and Fontem Ventures, to stop making, distributing and selling “unauthorized flavorings” by Feb. 6, or risk enforcement actions.

    Top-selling Juul’s four-week dollar sales have dropped from a 50.2 percent increase in the Aug. 10, 2019, report to a 5% uptick in the latest report. By comparison, Reynolds’ Vuse was up 82.2 percent in the latest report and NJoy down 22.3 percent.

    Juul’s market share dropped from 52.1percent in the previous report to 51.3 percent. It was at 53.3 percent a year ago. Vuse’s market share climbed from 29.2 percent to 30.6 percent, while No. 3 NJoy slipped from 5 percent to 4.9 percent, and Fontem Ventures’ blu eCigs slipped from 3.5 percent to 3.4 percent.

  • Hall Analytical Offers Free Webinar on PMTA Process

    Hall Analytical Offers Free Webinar on PMTA Process

    blinc team
    Credit: The Blinc Group

    Hall Analytical is offering a virtual seminar on Feb. 11, 5-6 pm GMT about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s premarket tobacco product application process.

    E-liquid and device manufacturers will have an opportunity to take part in a live Q&A session with subject matter experts.

    Panelists include David Lawson, CEO, Inter Scientific; Patricia Kovacevic, founder and principal, Regulation Strategy; and Sally McGuigan, principal scientist, Hall Analytical

    This session is limited to the first 50 registrants, and therefore places will be offered on a first come, first served basis.

    Participants can register here.

  • OFR Removes Final PMTA Rules From Federal Register

    OFR Removes Final PMTA Rules From Federal Register

    The Biden administration has announced a regulatory freeze on all new and pending rules introduced in the last part of the Trump administration. Included in the freeze are the new finalized rules for premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA) and substantial equivalence (SE) that were announced on Jan. 19, the last full day of the Trump administration.fda

    The FDA’s CBD enforcement policy draft guidance, which had been under review at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) since July, was also withdrawn.

    Stakeholders and lawmakers have been anticipating the guidance for two years, since the 2018 Farm Bill gave FDA authority over hemp-derived CBD. Representatives from the U.S. Hemp Roundtable and the National Industrial Hemp Council, both of which met with OMB to discuss the draft guide in late July, say the lack of regulatory clarity from the FDA has led to uncertainty in the hemp and CBD industry.

    The memo, issued by White House Chief of Staff Ronald Klain, calls on the heads of executive departments and agencies to “propose or issue no rule in any manner – including by sending a rule to the Office of the Federal Register [OFR] – until a department or agency head appointed or designated by the president after noon on January 20, 2021, reviews and approves the rule.” Previous administrations, including those of Trump and Barack Obama, issued similar memos to stop last-minute actions by the outgoing administration.

    What this means for the vapor industry is unclear. It does not change the rules concerning the Sept. 9 deadline to submit a PMTA to be eligible to stay on the market for year. Because the rule was not formally published in the Federal Register by the U.S. FDA before the end of Trump’s presidency, the Biden administration could move forward with the rule as is, make changes to the rule or scrap the rules entirely.

    An editor’s note on the Federal Register website reads, ” The Food and Drug Administration withdrew this document while it was on public inspection. It will remain on public inspection until the close of business on January 27, 2021. A copy of the withdrawal request is available at the Office of the Federal Register.”

    The White House memo also explains that it does not strictly apply to “rules” but also to “any substantive action by an agency (normally published in the Federal Register) that promulgates or is expected to lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including notices of inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and any agency statement of general applicability and future effect that sets for a policy on a statutory, regulatory, or technical issue or an interpretation of a statutory or regulatory issue.”

    Vapor Voice has reached out to the FDA for a response concerning the status of PMTAs for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products.