Tag: flavor ban

  • FDA Denies First Menthol-Flavor PMTAs After Review

    FDA Denies First Menthol-Flavor PMTAs After Review

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) for several menthol-flavored vaping products marketed by Logic Technology Development. The products include the Logic Pro Menthol e-Liquid Package and Logic Power Menthol e-Liquid Package. It’s the first time the FDA has issued MDOs for menthol products after receiving a scientific review.

    The move seems inline with the regulatory agency’s goal to ban menthol flavors from tobacco products. The FDA also isn’t expected to approve any flavored vaping product other than tobacco. In June, the National Institutes of Health and the FDA gave the University of Louisville a $3.6 million grant to study the effects of flavorings like mango and bubblegum used in vaping products. The study is still being conducted.

    “Ensuring new tobacco products undergo premarket evaluation is a critical part of the FDA’s work to reduce tobacco-related disease and death,” said Brian King, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), in a release. “We remain committed to evaluating new tobacco products based on a public health standard that considers the risks and benefits of the tobacco product to the population as a whole.”

    Gregory Conley, director of legislative and external affairs for the American Vapor Manufacturers Association, told Vapor Voice the latest move by the FDA to ban menthol vaping flavors is reminiscent of the agency’s “fatal flaw” review of PMTAs that resulted in millions of denials. The term “fatal flaw” was used by the FDA for PMTA submissions that didn’t have specific studies. The term has been at the center of nearly all lawsuits filed against the FDA for its handling of the PMTA process.

    “The dysfunction at the FDA knows no bounds. For the last year-plus, the FDA has sat back deferred decision making on menthol vaping products,” Conley said. “Lest anyone believe that FDA was hard at work coming up with ways to achieve balance, today they revealed that their big plan for menthol vaping products is to follow the exact same ‘fatal flaw’ review process that has led to dozens of lawsuits being filed against the agency.”

    The agency stated that after reviewing the company’s premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs), the FDA determined that the applications “lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate that permitting the marketing of the products would be appropriate for the protection of the public health (APPH), the applicable standard legally required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.”

    The FDA stated that the evidence provided within Logic’s denied PMTAs did not demonstrate that menthol-flavored e-cigarettes are more effective in promoting “complete switching or significant cigarette use reduction” relative to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.

    The announcement is concerning, especially since CTP is undergoing an external review in which many industry stakeholders have called for a comprehensive plan for PMTA reviews, according to Tony Abboud, executive director of the Vapor Technology Association. He says that the FDA’s action raises at least four major concerns.

    “First, the announced rationale makes no mention of the net public health benefit prong, begging the question of whether FDA addressed that required element of the APPH test? Second, how is the public health benefitted by FDA’s approval of 123 new menthol cigarette/cigar products, given its inability to authorize a single less-harmful menthol vaping product?” Abboud asks. “Third, how can the Agency continue to rely on general (i.e., non-Logic specific) menthol youth data to impose a heightened Logic-specific cessation standard, especially given the dramatically reduced [National Youth Tobacco Survey] NYTS youth use rates and no apparent tie to Logic products?

    “Fourth, is the Agency undermining its proposed menthol cigarette rule, given that FDA’s science shows that half of the predicted quitters under the proposed standard must switch to menthol vapes, none of which have been authorized?”

    Logic must now decide if it will resubmit applications or submit new applications to address the deficiencies for the products that are subject to these MDOs. However, the FDA states that for non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes, including menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, “existing evidence demonstrates a known and substantial risk” with regard to youth appeal, uptake and use.

    “The FDA conducts a rigorous, scientific review of submitted premarket tobacco product applications, evaluating the data for each product to determine if it meets the public health standard,” said King. “In this case, the applicant did not provide sufficient scientific evidence to show that the potential benefit to adult smokers outweighs the risks to youth.”

    A recently accepted manuscript of an article set for publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research found that flavored vaping and other tobacco sales restrictions in California did not affect youth e-cigarette use.

    The MDO letter that Logic received today is not limited to the two products named above, according to the agency. In general, the FDA publicly names only products that the applicant is marketing to avoid potential disclosure of confidential commercial information.

    Any products subject to an MDO may not be offered for sale or distributed in the United States, or the FDA may take enforcement action. These products cannot be legally introduced into interstate commerce in the U.S. without risking FDA enforcement. In March, the FDA authorized several tobacco-flavored e-cigarette products from the company under the Logic Vapeleaf, Logic Power and Logic Pro brands, including devices. 

    In addition to ensuring that Logic complies with this order, the FDA intends to ensure compliance by distributors and retailers. Specifically, the FDA notes that all new tobacco products on the market without the “statutorily required premarket authorization” are marketed unlawfully and their distribution or sale is subject to enforcement action.

    Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice filed complaints for permanent injunctions in federal district courts against six e-cigarette manufacturers on behalf of the FDA. The cases represent the first time the FDA has initiated injunction proceedings to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act’s premarket review requirements for new tobacco products.

    Retailers should contact Logic with any questions about products in their inventory. 

  • Foster City Again Plans to Ban Flavored Vapes

    Foster City Again Plans to Ban Flavored Vapes

    Foster City, California, plans to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products and e-cigarettes, with the city council to consider an ordinance at its next meeting. The city tabled the bill in August for lack of support.

    “I firmly believe this is our opportunity to do right by our children,” Councilmember Sanjay Gehani said.

    The council originally only planned to apply an ordinance to flavored tobacco, but a push from Gehani and Vice Mayor Jon Froomin at the Oct. 3 meeting to have a more stringent ban that includes e-cigarettes swayed Mayor Richa Awasthi and Councilmember Patrick Sullivan, according to the Daily Journal.

    Staff will also bring back a tobacco resale license ordinance to address violations of the smoking ordinance ban brought. The ordinance, suggested by Froomin, will detail enforcement the city can take for those who defy the ban. Froomin said stringent enforcement was needed to be effective in the community.

    The proposed ordinance would apply to convenience stores, grocery stores, gas stations and other businesses.

    Cities like Half Moon Bay, South San Francisco, Burlingame, San Carlos, San Mateo and Redwood City have prohibited selling flavored tobacco. The state has passed Senate Bill 793, signed into law in 2020, which calls for tobacco retailers not to sell flavored tobacco products.

    However, the state has halted implementation due to a referendum calling for its repeal, stalling a decision. California voters in the November election will vote on the status of SB 793, called Proposition 31.

  • China Rules Make Shops Close, Black Market Growing

    China Rules Make Shops Close, Black Market Growing

    Before China’s national standards were implemented, vape shops were growing rapidly throughout the country. (Photo: Timothy S. Donahue)

    China’s National Standard for Electronic Cigarettes have begun, however, a reporter from Beijing Youth Daily claims many businesses still secretly sell the “fruit flavor” that has been banned from sale, a Chinese news outlet claims.

    The report also states that after the implementation of the national standard several vape shops have closed. A reporter from Beijing Daily visited some e-cigarette sales stores or brand counters on October 2 and found that a small number of stores had been closed, and the words “transfer” were also posted.

    In stores that are still in operation, only an estimated six brands of vaping products are on display, and there only two or three varieties of products. Some stores have seen the increased sale of combustible tobacco products.

    China’s ban on flavored vapor products went into effect on Oct. 1 along with other new vaping product standards that were decided on earlier this year.

    In November 2021, Chinese law was amended to bring the vapor industry under control of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, which regulates China’s tobacco products.

    Products meant for export will not have to meet Chinese standards unless the destination country does not have its own specific standards.

  • European Vape Alliance Opposes Dutch Flavor Ban

    European Vape Alliance Opposes Dutch Flavor Ban

    Photo: Wirestock

    The Independent European Vape Alliance (IEVA) has expressed concerns about the Draft Amendment of the Tobacco and Smoking Products Order for regulation of e-cigarette flavors presented by the Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports.

    According to the statement submitted by the Dutch authorities, the draft amendment intends to ban flavors other than tobacco in e-liquids in order to “reduce the temptation for young people and former smokers to purchase e-cigarettes.” The measure, authorities note, is “justified by the need to protect public health.”

    The proposal also suggest that the Netherlands will be more likely to achieve its objective of a smoke-free generation by 2040 if e-cigarettes are rendered less attractive.

    According to the IEVA, the proposed flavor ban is neither proportional nor necessary, as it is too strong a measure for the objective it seeks to achieve and fails the EU requirement that member states choose the means that least restricts the free movement of goods.

    The IEVA insists that the ban will boost black market activity and jeopardize  tens of thousands of jobs, while leading to a reduction in government revenues by reducing tax collection.

  • China’s Flavor Vape Ban Goes Into Effect on Oct. 1

    China’s Flavor Vape Ban Goes Into Effect on Oct. 1

    China’s ban on flavored vapor products takes effect on Oct. 1 along with other new vaping product standards that were decided on earlier this year, reports Vaping360.

    In November 2021, Chinese law was amended to bring the vapor industry under control of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, which regulates China’s tobacco products.

    Vapers are rushing to buy and hoard flavored vapor products before the ban takes effect on Saturday, according to Vaping360. It is not clear yet if the ban will create a large black market in the country; China is known to punish illicit sellers harshly.

    Products meant for export will not have to meet Chinese standards unless the destination country does not have its own specific standards.

  • Malaysia Pushing Forward on Bill to ‘Endgame’ Vapes

    Malaysia Pushing Forward on Bill to ‘Endgame’ Vapes

    Credit: K Stocker

    The Malaysian government is pushing forward a bill that seeks to ban vaping and smoking for those born from 2007, after making amendments following resistance from some lawmakers.

    Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said he hopes the legislation – dubbed a “generational endgame” (GEG) – will receive the support of lawmakers when it is tabled at the next parliament session in October.

    It was referred to a parliamentary select committee in August for further scrutiny amid criticism that some of its features would infringe on personal freedom.

    “The enforcement powers really are focused and restricted only against distribution, manufacturing and supply,” Khairy said during a Sept. 23 group interview, according to media reports. “We’ve clarified that in the latest amendments, so if you contravene the law in terms of GEG smoking offence, then the enforcement officer cannot frisk you, they cannot take away your computer or your phone or things like that.”

    Malaysian lawmakers last month delayed a vote on the bill and referred it to the select committee to examine and make recommendations for improvement.

    The bill also bans those born after 2007 from buying, possessing or using tobacco and other related products even after they reach 18.

    Shopkeepers and distributors will be prohibited from selling such products to anyone in the age group under the proposal.

  • Dutch Comment Period on Flavor Ban Closes Sept. 28

    Dutch Comment Period on Flavor Ban Closes Sept. 28

    Credit: Michal Soukup

    On Sept. 28, the Dutch government’s brief public consultation period for a potential ban of flavored vaping products comes to a close.

    The new rule would ban all e-liquid flavors except tobacco and is scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, 2023. However, products already on the market by Dec. 31 can be sold until July 1, 2023.

    The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM) and Ministry of Health have proposed a list of just 16 ingredients that would be allowed in legal tobacco-flavored e-liquids.

    Numerous Dutch vaping industry advocates claim the ingredient restrictions will essentially put all e-liquid manufacturers in the Netherlands out of business.

    Since the comment period is open to the public and Dutch e-cigarette advocates are asking for comments from consumers and interested supporters across the globe, even outside of the EU.

    Previous efforts to ban flavored vapes in the Netherlands have failed.

  • Washington County, Oregon Flavor Ban Struck Down

    Washington County, Oregon Flavor Ban Struck Down

    scales of justice
    Credit: Sang Hyun Cho

    Washington County, Oregon’s flavored vaping and tobacco ban has been struck down by a judge who stated that counties in Oregon do not have the authority to enact such measures and that they must come from the state legislature.

    On Monday, Circuit Judge Andrew Erwin issued his ruling, noting that while counties can regulate how sales of such products are made, they cannot bar them entirely.

    This effectively brings an end to a ban passed by the county’s Board of Commissioners in November 2021 and approved by voters in May 2022 after a petition was filed to put the matter on the ballot.

    The ban sought to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco products and flavored synthetic nicotine, as well as prohibit price promotions, coupons and discounts.

    In a written statement issued on Wednesday, the county said that it disagrees with the Court’s ruling and is considering options for an appeal.

    Washington County is located directly west of Portland and has a population of around 600,000 people.

  • Macau Approves Law Against E-Cigarettes, Full Ban Possible

    Macau Approves Law Against E-Cigarettes, Full Ban Possible

    The Macau parliament approved an amendment to the law on smoking prevention and control that prohibits the manufacture, distribution, import, export and transport of vaping products in and out of the region.

    The law provides for penalties of MOP4,000 ($500) for individuals, with a fine of between MOP20,000 and MOP200,000 for companies.

    Although the proposal was unanimously approved, during the debate in the Legislative Assembly, several members said that the government should go further, and impose a total ban on e-cigarettes, reports Macau Business.

    Leong Sun Lok expressed concern that the new legislation might increase the smuggling or sale of e-cigarettes through the Internet or lead to an increase in the number of conventional cigarette users.

    The Macau Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China’s secretary for social affairs and culture confirmed that they are considering a later ban on e-cigarettes after giving “some time” to smokers who may “still have some in stock.”

    Elsie Ao Ieong U also promised to review, within three years, the tax on all tobacco products, which in Macau is around 60 percent of the final price.

    Ron Lam U Tou advocated increasing the tax, noting that the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends a value of 75 percent.

    The only Portuguese member in the parliament, José Pereira Coutinho, warned that the legislative revision could harm tourists who are only “passing through,” namely to mainland China, where e-cigarettes are allowed.

    The legislative amendment will come into force three months after it is published in the Official Bulletin of the Chinese special administrative region.

    The sale, advertising and promotion of e-cigarettes have been prohibited in Macau since 2018.

    The government justified the changes to the law with “the strong evidence that this type of tobacco product is harmful to health, and can endanger the safety of people,” recalling that the consumption of e-cigarettes has increased, especially among young people.

    The government stressed that e-cigarettes are banned in the neighboring region of Hong Kong and Singapore, and the Taiwanese parliament is also discussing a proposed ban.

  • Study Finds Flavor Bans Failed to Reduce Youth Vaping

    Study Finds Flavor Bans Failed to Reduce Youth Vaping

    Credit: Steheap

    A recently accepted manuscript of an article set for publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research found that flavored vaping and other tobacco sales restrictions in California did not affect youth e-cigarette use.

    Karl Abramson, writing for American for Tax Reform (ATR), says that the findings are prominent because proponents of flavor bans claim that flavored vaping products are the cause of youth vaping, and therefore must be banned.

    Researchers analyzed data from the California Healthy Kids Survey to look at e-cigarette use among high-school students in the California Bay Area.

    They compared changes in e-cigarette use between 2018 and 2019 among students attending school in a city with a flavored e-cigarette ban and student attending school in a city without a flavor ban.

    The researchers concluded that flavored vape bans “did not significantly change” the odds of current and ever e-cigarette use among students. 

    Local flavor bans in California “were not associated with a change” in e-cigarette use, meaning that the policies that were intended to decrease youth vaping did not accomplish that goal.

    “Flavored vape bans are proven to have drastically negative consequences for public health, state finances, and national security,” writes Abramson. According to a study from Yale University researcher Abigail Friedman, a flavor ban in San Francisco led to chances of youth smoking more than doubling.

    “Because flavors are essential for adults trying to quit smoking, flavor bans prevent adults from making the lifesaving switch,” he stated. “State finances are impacted by flavor bans as well, like in Massachusetts where a ban on flavored vaping and tobacco products is costing the state an estimated $10 million each month.

    “Flavor bans prevent these lives from being saved and are shown to have no impact on youth use. Flavor prohibition is entirely the wrong approach for lawmakers to take with novel reduced-risk nicotine products.”