Tag: flavor ban

  • Nebraska Bill Would Ban Local Vape Ordinances

    Nebraska Bill Would Ban Local Vape Ordinances

    A new bill introduced in Nebraska would limit localities in how they regulate electronic smoking devices under a bill heard Feb. 17 by the state senate’s Health and Human Services Committee. LB954, introduced by Omaha Sen. Justin Wayne, would prohibit counties and municipalities from adopting ordinances or resolutions regarding electronic smoking devices that are more restrictive than the provisions of the Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act.

    This would include banning certain smoking devices or flavors, according to state’s legislative website. Wayne said the bill would prevent a “patchwork” of vaping regulations across the state. “It would make it easier for the industry to provide their services to their customers,” he said.

    Credit: Niro World

    Sarah Linden, president of the Nebraska Vape Venders Association, testified in support of the bill. She said the Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act allows vape shop customers to sample products, but Lincoln and Grand Island have ordinances banning indoor vaping in all circumstances.

    LB954 would standardize the law across the state and enable customers to try out various products before they purchase them. “There’s nothing worse than buying something and deciding you don’t like it once you get home,” Linden said.

    Dave Watts, president of the Nebraska Medical Association, spoke in opposition to the bill. He said state law should apply equally to vaping and cigarettes. “Vaping devices don’t simply emit harmless water vapor … heating the substances in the chamber of a vaping device creates an aerosol,” Watts said. “Unlike water vapor, that aerosol contains nicotine — ultra-fine particles that can worsen asthma — and toxins that are known to cause cancer.”

    Maggie Ballard of Heartland Family Service also testified in opposition to LB954. She said nicotine is a “pilot light” for other addictions and that individuals with substance abuse disorders are better off without it. “Community members want to see less vaping, not more,” Ballard said.

    Also in opposition was Lash Chaffin of the League of Nebraska Municipalities. He said the bill would take away a municipality’s ability to regulate vaping as it sees fit. The committee took no immediate action on LB954.

  • Irish Vape Group Defends Flavor Preferences of Adults

    Irish Vape Group Defends Flavor Preferences of Adults

    Ireland’s Oireachtas Health Committee yesterday heard testimony from three members of the Irish Vape Vendors Association (IVVA) as politicians continued scrutiny of the general scheme of the Public Health (Tobacco and Nicotine Inhaling Products) Bill. The three members of the IVVA, who all have ties to the vaping industry, argued that flavors should be retained as people seeking to give up smoking using vapor products “want to move away from the flavor of tobacco.”

    Credit: Юлия Кравченко

    Social Democrats TD Róisín Shortall asked the IVVA about a number of vape flavors that she said would be “particularly attractive to under 18s.” Addressing the committee, Shortall named a number of the flavors listed on their websites including Dr Frost Lemonade Fizz, Apple Berry Crumble and Purple Slush. “Surely there isn’t a demand for adults from those for those flavors, they very much sound like flavors that are designed to appeal to children,” she said. Shortall also said that some products are sold with “cartoon-like packaging” such as “Vampire Vape”.

    In response, Joanna O’Connell of Vapourpal said their website “only stocks flavors that our adult customers request,” according to The Journal. “They’re not attracted by the packaging, they are attracted by the flavor. That specific flavor that you’re speaking of that’s on our website is one of the most popular fruit flavored e-liquids among adults,” she said.

    O’Connell agreed that the packaging was “cartoon-like” and added that they have “been onto the manufacturer regarding that.” Shortall also sought clarity from the IVVA on online age verification for buying e-cigarette products online. One IVVA member said that there are no “foolproof” age verification systems for online e-cigarettes websites.

  • Irish Vape Group to Urge Health Officials Against Flavor Ban

    Irish Vape Group to Urge Health Officials Against Flavor Ban

    Members of the Irish Vape Vendors Association (IVVA) will argue today that flavored nicotine vaping products should not be restricted in newly proposed tobacco control legislation.

    The Joint Committee on Health is meeting with representatives from the IVVA for pre-legislative scrutiny of the general proposals included in the Public Health (Tobacco and Nicotine Inhaling Products) Bill.

    The proposed legislation would prohibit the sale of vaping and tobacco and heat-not-burn (HnB) products to persons under the age of 18. It will also make it illegal for under-18s to sell such products, according to The Journal.

    Credit: a4stockphotos

    The committee previously heard concerns from the Irish Heart Foundation that teen smoking rates are increasing for the first time in ten years due to an “explosion” of vaping among this age group.

    “Research from the Health Research Board has found that teenagers who vape are up to five times more likely to take up smoking citing the gateway effect. We welcome the opportunity to discuss these and other related matters with representatives,” a committee member said.

    A spokesperson for the IVVA argues that e-liquid flavors are of vital importance to adult vapers. The IVVA says it is “deeply concerned” by the negative effects a flavor ban could have on tobacco harm reduction and consumer choice.

    “The main argument in favor of banning flavored e-liquids is the potential risk of making vaping products more attractive to minors with child-friendly flavorings & packaging. The association between vaping flavors and subsequent smoking initiation is not substantiated. Banning flavored e-liquids would also run counter to vape consumers’ interest. IVVA members observe daily that the choice of e-liquid flavors is one of the reasons that encourages an adult smoker make the switch to vaping.” the IVVA will tell the committee.

    Ireland hopes to be tobacco-free by 2025.

  • Hawaii Bill to Ban Flavors, Synthetics Moves Forward

    Hawaii Bill to Ban Flavors, Synthetics Moves Forward

    Credit: 5m3photos

    A bill in Hawaii’s House of Representatives (HB 1570) proposes to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco and synthetic nicotine products. HB 1570 would also prohibit companies from mislabeling e-liquid products as nicotine-free and marketing electronic smoking devices to appeal to anyone under the age of 21. 

    Retailers who violate the proposed rule would face a $500 fine for a first offense and between $500 and $2,000 for a second violation, according to KITV.

    Anyone under the age of 21 in possession of a synthetic nicotine product or electronic smoking device would be fined $10 for a first offense. Any repeats would cost $50 or between 48 and 72 hours of community service.

    After Thursday’s hearing, lawmakers advanced and amended the bill to include quarterly meetings between the Department of Health and students across all schools on the matter. Establishing a vape and e-cigarette take-back program at high school and intermediate campuses statewide was also added to the measure.

    HB 1570 faces several other hearings and readings in the house.

  • Portland 2nd Major City in Maine to Ban Flavored Vapes

    Portland 2nd Major City in Maine to Ban Flavored Vapes

    Credit: Ianm35

    The Portland City Council in the U.S. state of Maine voted unanimously Monday night to ban flavored tobacco products come June.

    On Monday night, city councilors unanimously approved a ban after hours of testimony. Among those who spoke were several tobacco retailers, who argued that the ban would hurt their business, while customers would simply travel to other towns to purchase flavored products.

    The council said this ban is only a step in the right direction. This makes Portland the second Maine city to ban flavored tobacco products, following in the footsteps of the Bangor City Council. The Bangor ban takes effect on June 1. The town of Brunswick plans to consider a ban later this month.

    Maine lawmakers are also looking at a potential statewide ban of flavored tobacco. A bill about the subject is expected to come up for a vote sometime this spring, according to the Associated Press.

  • Washington County, Oregon Flavor Ban Placed on Hold

    Washington County, Oregon Flavor Ban Placed on Hold

    Credit: Vlad

    A Washington County ban on retailers selling flavored vaping and other tobacco products has been put on hold and will be on the ballot in May after petitioners gathered signatures to stop the ban, the county announced.

    Ordinance 878, passed November 2, 2021 by the Washington County Board of Commissioners, banned the sale of flavored tobacco products and flavored synthetic nicotine, according to news reports.

    The ban went into effect December 2, 2021 but retailers had until January 1, 2022 to take the products off the shelves, when the ordinance was enforced.

    However, enough signatures have been gathered to place the ordinance “on hold” while a Washington County Election official verifies the signatures to reverse the ban. The county has 15 days to verify the signatures.

    This means Washington County retailers can now sell the flavored tobacco products and the ban will not be enforced while signatures are verified.

    Meanwhile, the ordinance can still go back in place if there aren’t enough signatures, or if a majority of voters approve it in May.

  • Massachusetts: Flavor Ban Pushes Sales Next Door

    Massachusetts: Flavor Ban Pushes Sales Next Door

    Credit: Aboltin

    Massachusetts’ ban of flavored tobacco products is not the success its proponents make it out to be, according to Ulrik Boesen of the Tax Foundation.

    While a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that the sale of flavored tobacco in Massachusetts decreased more than in 27 control states in the wake of the state ban, the authors failed to consider the impact of cross-border trade.

    According to Boesen, increased sales in neighboring New Hampshire and Rhode Island almost completely made up for the decrease in Massachusetts.

    “The end result of the ban, in fact, is that Massachusetts is stuck with the societal costs associated with consumption, while the revenue from taxing flavored tobacco products is being raised in neighboring states,” Boesen wrote on the Tax Foundation’s website.

    Looking at the New England region as a whole confirms that the flavor ban did not work as intended, according to Boesen. “Sales moved around rather than disappeared, and the ban evidently did not impact consumption,” he wrote. “Total sales for the region decreased by slightly more than 1 percent comparing the 12 months preceding the ban to the 12 months following the ban—largely comparable to the national sales trends.”

    Last year, a study by the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association (NECSEMA), found excise tax lost income in Massachusetts from selling fewer menthol cigarettes alone amounted to $62 million in the first six months of the ban. No specific figures were given for electronic nicotine delivery systems in the release for that study.

    The previous study also found that losses simply transferred to Massachusetts’ neighboring states. Cigarettes excise tax stamp sales dropped 23.9 percent in Massachusetts while New Hampshire gained $28,574,340 or 29.7 percent. Rhode Island gained $12,100,000 or 18.2 percent in excise taxes.

    The previous study’s estimated Massachusetts loss including the sales tax is $73,008,000 while Rhode Island saw a gain of $14,066,740.

    As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other states consider Massachusetts’ example, Boesen urges lawmakers to think twice before banning flavored tobacco products. “The experience out of Massachusetts has not been a success story and other states should be wary of conducting their own expensive experiments,” he wrote.

  • Connecticut Governor Reiterates Need for Flavor Ban

    Connecticut Governor Reiterates Need for Flavor Ban

    When Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont pushed for Philip Morris to relocate its headquarters from New York City to Stamford last year, the move quickly drew rebuke from anti-tobacco activists. The activists said the move would be a test of the governor’s support for a ban on flavored vaping products in the state.

    Now, just weeks away from the 2022 legislative session, Lamont said he’s committed to supporting a flavored vape ban but is not guaranteeing the proposal will be in his midterm budget plan, which is expected to be unveiled next month, according to CT Insider.

    Credit: Andy Dean

    “I’m ready to go on that,” Lamont said Tuesday, asked about his support for the ban after an unrelated event in Bloomfield. “I think it was the right thing to do last time. I think we proposed it once or twice. This time I’d like to work with the legislature to see if they’ll step up. I’ll sign it.”

    Last year’s effort fell apart in the 11th hour after a diluted version of the ban was stripped from the massive budget implementer bill at the request of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The group said at the time that the proposal was “riddled with major loopholes” and could have made Connecticut more subject to lawsuits from the vaping industry.

  • Sponsors of Colorado Flavored Vapor Ban Bill Confident

    Sponsors of Colorado Flavored Vapor Ban Bill Confident

    Credit Renan

    Selling flavored tobacco and nicotine products could soon be illegal in Colorado if lawmakers approve — and the governor signs — a bill prohibiting their sale.

    House Bill 22-1064 would ban, starting July 1, the sale of all flavored tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, Hookah, chewing tobacco and cigars, in Colorado.

    Under the proposal, any retailer caught selling flavored tobacco or nicotine products would be subject to the same penalties as a retailer caught selling to minors.

    The measure’s sponsors are confident it would reach the finish line. 

    State Sen. Kevin Priola, one of the sponsors, said he was inspired to take action after his son started vaping around the age of 14. Priola said he would constantly search his son’s room for vapes and would have to drive to far-away dumpsters to throw them away to prevent him from digging the vapes out of the trash.

    “It’s everywhere. Our experience isn’t unique,” Priola said. “You look at the data and realize a lot of these manufacturers — they use the flavors to get young kids hooked on it.”

    Brian Fojtik, a Denver resident and representative of the National Association of Tobacco Outlets, said the ban is unnecessary because youth tobacco use has been decreasing for years.

    “It’s shortsighted approach,” Fojtik said. “Prohibition proponents aren’t protecting kids. They’re shamefully using kids as political props, attempting to use legitimate concern about youth vaping to ban hundreds of products to adults that youth are not using that have nothing to do with vaping.”

    In December, Denver, Colorado’s City Council approved a controversial ordinance that outlaws the sale of flavored vaping and other tobacco products, including menthol, beginning in July 2023.

  • Hawaiian Legislators Want to Ban Flavored Vapes in 2022

    Hawaiian Legislators Want to Ban Flavored Vapes in 2022

    Credit: Timothy S. Donahue

    The 2022 legislative session kicked off Wednesday, starting a nearly five-month process that will shape Hawaiʻi’s future. On Tuesday, legislators and advocates with the Keiki Caucus unveiled their priorities for the upcoming session.

    The caucus will be introducing nearly 30 bills covering issues such as sex trafficking, after-school programs, and sex education. The group will also attempt to ban all flavored vaping products. State Rep. Scot Matayoshi said the bill will also make it harder for kids to purchase these products.

    “95 percent of smokers start before the age of 21 and 81 percent of youth have tried a flavored nicotine product as their first tobacco product,” he said in an Hawai’i Public Radio report. “So these products really are a gateway into nicotine addiction.”

    “What really hit home for me is that 31 percent of middle schoolers have tried vaping — and that’s the age of student that I used to teach when I was a DOE teacher. So that really struck a chord in me that a third of my students would have been vaping right now or would have tried a flavored vaping product,” he told Hawaiʻi Public Radio. “It’s really targeting kids. That’s what makes it very insidious. And it’s disguising nicotine, which is a highly addictive drug as a candy-flavored product.”

    Matayoshi acknowledged past efforts to ban flavored tobacco products have fallen short but says he is hopeful for this year.