Flonq introduces its solution to address the lack of ability to control nicotine consumption.
Contributed
A range of studies suggests that e-cigarettes can be an effective tool for helping conventional tobacco smokers quit. However, once individuals switch from tobacco smoking to e-cigarettes, there is no clear baseline for before and after comparison, since most users are unable to track how frequently they vape. Vape companies and manufacturers should propose solutions as part of their responsibilities. How can this be achieved? Alfabet Labs, the company behind the Flonq brand, offers its perspective on this issue.
One of the most recent studies on the effectiveness of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool was conducted by the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The report concluded that there is high-certainty evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes are more effective than other methods, such as nicotine-replacement therapy—like patches or gum.
However, the goal after switching to e-cigarettes is to control, decrease or quit nicotine consumption. This presents a challenge, as it’s hard to accurately measure e-cigarette use to control nicotine intake. The main issue is figuring how to measure usage intensity, given the wide range of products and user behaviors.
So what should be the basis for comparing the consumption dynamic after switching to e-cigarettes? Should industry professionals measure the number of times an e-cigarette is used per day, the number of puffs taken, or the volume of e-liquid consumed? A consensus on measurement standards has yet to be established.
Vaping vs. cigarettes
The Eurobarometer study, which revealed key trends in smoking behavior in the EU, clearly illustrates the issue of accurate vape measurement. According to the report, the average daily consumption of tobacco was slightly higher than 14 units.
The data also reveals insights into e-cigarette usage. Among smokers who use e-cigarettes, the range resulted to be the following: 60 percent reported using them less than 10 times per day, 28 percent less than 20 times and approximately 11 percent over 21 times. A similar pattern was observed among ex-smokers who used e-cigarettes.
However, what is particularly important is that nearly half of the respondents reported being unsure about their previous daily usage of e-cigarettes. This uncertainty among former smokers about their past usage highlights the need for more research in this area.
Measuring consumption
The Nicotine & Tobacco Research journal conducted a study asking young adults who vape to provide suggestions for improving the scientific measurement of vaping.
Participants reported that they don’t actively monitor the number of puffs they take during a vaping session or over the course of a day. One participant remarked, “I would never count how many [puffs] I take.”
Additionally, several respondents noted that it is challenging for them to estimate how many times they vape during the day. They also expressed uncertainty about the amount of nicotine they consume per session. One participant said: “I wish that I could measure how much I’m [vaping]. I have no idea how much nicotine I’m taking in … I’m probably taking in more than a pack [of cigarettes] a day.”
Another respondent added, “No one can count how many times or how many hits in an hour. It’s pretty subconscious.”
It’s clear that using vapes to quit smoking or manage nicotine dependence won’t be effective without devices that include features for monitoring consumption. Whether it tracks the number of puffs, daily usage or other patterns, the device should provide a comparison point for the user.
Practical solutions
The Flonq vaping brand recently introduced its solution to address the lack of controlling the nicotine consumption in the industry. The brand presented META by Flonq—an advanced pod system designed for tracking and managing nicotine use. The device features a wide range of features that respond to the market demand for consumption transparency.
The real-time tracking system
The device monitors data such as the number of puffs, usage time and nicotine index level, all displayed on a single touch screen. The device collects data throughout the entire period of vape usage.
META Smart AI assistant
The integrated AI assistant helps to analyze nicotine usage patterns. With built-in behavioral therapy techniques, META is designed to offer personalized guidance.
Nicotine index
A key highlight of the device is the nicotine index developed by Flonq, which measures estimated nicotine saturation and determines the optimal timing for the next puff. It updates in real time, allowing users to follow a suggested plan to reduce nicotine intake or quit smoking.
“Whether you want to vape, reduce your nicotine intake or move toward a smoke-free life, the choice is yours,” says Marlen Nazarov, Flonq’s founder and CEO. “Our company’s focus is to respect your decision to vape while encouraging mindful choices.”
Overall, it seems that META offers consumers a straightforward and user-friendly way to track their nicotine usage—something the market needs to implement right away. This can be achieved through smart technologies such as integration with mobile apps, Bluetooth connectivity and alerts to notify users of excessive consumption. As the industry evolves and expands, these efforts will be essential in helping users manage their nicotine intake, make positive changes to their health and, what’s also important—to improve the industry’s overall image.
The rate of “battery thermal Runaway incidents”—instances of lithium-ion batteries overheating on passenger planes—hit a five-year peak last year, with e-cigarettes being the biggest culprit, according to a report from UL Standards & Engagement (ULSE), a nonprofit organization focused on safety standards.
The data comes from ULSE’s Thermal Runaway Incident Program (TRIP), a voluntary lithium-ion battery incident reporting system. TRIP comprises 35 passenger and cargo airline participants. The program was designed with the aviation industry to better understand the extent of thermal runaway incidents caused by lithium-ion batteries onboard aircraft and how to prepare for, or ideally prevent, future incidents.
“Passengers are often unaware that many devices they bring on board are powered by lithium-ion batteries, let alone the risks they carry, and it’s much harder to solve a problem that they do not know exists,” said David Wroth, director of technology and systems at ULSE and the leader of TRIP, in a statement. “Thermal runaway incidents on board aircraft are largely preventable but admittedly more difficult to contend with at 40,000 feet. TRIP provides a unique opportunity for the aviation industry to come together to find strategies to mitigate the risk of these incidents.”
As technology evolves and more products rely on rechargeable power, lithium-ion batteries are getting more powerful and in some cases larger, further complicating the thermal runaway threat. Damaged, substandard, or counterfeit batteries run the greatest risk of going into thermal runway, presenting serious consequences in flight.
Key takeaways from the report include:
Incidents are at the highest point in five years of data collection, rising 28 percent from 2019-2023. There are an average of two thermal runaway incidents reported in the TRIP database each week. While on the rise, with approximately 180,000 flights in U.S. airspace per week, it is still highly unlikely to experience a thermal runaway incident.
The average passenger brings four rechargeable devices on board. Most common items include smartphones (82 percent), laptops (41 percent), wireless headphones (39 percent), and tablets (36 percent). E-cigarettes were responsible for the most incidents in 2023, with 35 percent of reported incidents attributed to vaping devices on passenger flights, followed by power banks, representing another 16 percent of incidents.
Most incidents happen on the aircraft with devices that are stored near the passenger’s seat. Almost nine out of 10 (87 percent) incidents are reported on the aircraft, with the remaining 13 percent occurring when baggage and personal items are on the move. On the aircraft, thermal runaway incidents occur in or around the passenger’s seat nearly 60 percent of the time.
The vast majority of incidents are addressed before reaching the fire or explosion stage of thermal runaway. Most (85 percent) incidents in 2023 were addressed when batteries showed warning signs such as overheating and smoking prior to entering full thermal runaway. While only 15 percent of incidents resulted in fire or explosion, the speed in which thermal runaway can develop means that the events in the majority could have been more serious had the issue not been addressed quickly.
Rechargeable devices are being packed in checked luggage. The devices that were most cited in thermal runaway incidents in 2023 were also the two most frequently put in checked luggage, according to passengers surveyed. More than a quarter (27 percent) of travelers reported checking portable chargers, and another 27 percent said they checked e-cigarettes. Devices that enter thermal runaway in checked baggage cannot be accessed by crew while in flight, and fires may not be detected as quickly in the cargo hold as they would be in the cabin.
“Our research highlights several trouble spots that need to be addressed, from passengers missing warnings about lithium-ion batteries to packing rechargeable devices out of reach,” said Lesley Rohrbaugh, head of insights and policy analysis for ULSE. “But we also see clear opportunities to reduce the risk and that’s where we’re focused.”
Through additional passenger and cabin crew focus groups and interviews conducted by ULSE and data from TRIP, strategies to reduce these risks include passenger education, cabin crew training, and standards for aircraft baggage handling.
The Flonq Max Pro’s airflow is smooth and quiet, and there is no struggle to produce vapor.
By Mike Huml
The Flonq Max Pro is a newly released version of the Flonq Max that offers multiple quality-of-life improvements and upgrades while retaining the same look and feel. The Max Pro isn’t just an ordinary disposable. Sure, it’s simple to use and isn’t loaded up with bells and whistles, but it performs wonderfully and has a great aesthetic. These coupled with the convenience of new features make the Max Pro more than worthy of keeping an eye on.
As far as standard features are concerned, the Max Pro includes a 650 mAh internal battery that’s charged via a USB type-C port on the bottom of the device. It contains 18 mL of e-liquid and is advertised to last 20,000 puffs. There is no adjustable airflow, but the default airflow is very smooth and restrictive enough to be reminiscent of a cigarette.
The unique flattened egg shape is very comfortable to hold, even though it may be slightly too large for those with small hands or those who are looking for something truly tiny. The trade-off is increased liquid capacity and battery life, and Flonq offers several smaller products as well. The Max Pro is the largest device in the line, tied with the Flonq Ultra.
On the flat side of the Max Pro is a screen and a button. The screen will illuminate during and for a short time after each drag to display the remaining e-liquid and battery life, and that is a great new trend being seen in high-end disposables. It takes all the guesswork out of using these devices while retaining all the simplicity of operation.
The button below the screen serves one purpose, and that is to toggle boost mode. When boost mode is activated, the rocket ship icon on the screen will turn from white to red, and the Max Pro will fire at a higher power. The heating element is two mesh coils, so even in boost mode, burning and dry hits are nonissues.
One may think that boost mode decreases the puff count, but that’s not necessarily true. While in normal mode, the Max Pro can be used as most any other mouth-to-lung device—long, slow drags as vapers have become accustomed to in order to give the heating element ample time to heat up and produce good vapor.
In boost mode, the Max Pro can be treated more like a traditional cigarette, with quick and sharp drags producing the same amount of vapor in less time. When used in this way, boost mode will still yield around 20,000 puffs since those puffs are shorter and about the same amount of e-liquid is consumed per drag.
However, when long, slow drags are taken while boost mode is active, this will use more e-liquid and more battery power per puff and shorten the life span. While this is not a feature unique to the Max Pro, Flonq’s implementation is among the best. There is a clear purpose to its usage, and it serves to appeal to vapers with different preferences.
As far as vape quality goes, the Max Pro competes with the best of them. Airflow is smooth and quiet, and there is no struggle to produce vapor. There is no spitback, gurgling, leaking or dry hits even when the device is set down sideways (this is necessary given the shape—it cannot be set down with the mouthpiece facing up).
Flonq also offers upward of 25 flavors ranging from tobacco and menthol to candy and fruit flavors. There is something here for everyone to enjoy, and each flavor packs a punch. Each drag is bold and flavorful and sticks to the tongue after the device is set down. Each flavor is distinct and refreshing as most of the fruit flavors contain at least a hint of menthol to bring out the crispness of the fruit flavor.
The Flonq Max Pro is as close to a perfect disposable device as one can currently get. It’s not overly large, although the size is justified. It’s more than capable of lasting the average vaper at least one week and several days for heavy users. The battery is on the average side, but even heavy users can expect to get about a full day’s worth of use before a charge is required.
The screen shows essential information at a glance, removing any frustration associated with relying on a disposable device to make it through the day. What’s more, the Max Pro features passthrough functionality, so it can be used while it’s charging. A full charge takes about 30 minutes, which just about pushes the limit of how fast a battery can be charged.
The aesthetic quality is great as well. The glossy, hard plastic might not be appealing to everyone at first, but it doesn’t attract fingerprints or ever start to look dingy unlike many other devices that opt for the rubberized matte finish. Each flavor corresponds to a specific colorway, making it easy to identify which flavor is which for those who like variety, and the colors do not cross the line into being tacky or toy-like.
The Flonq Max Pro is undoubtedly one of, if not the best disposable vapor device on the market. It vapes great, has a unique look that doesn’t go over the top, and a multitude of flavors are available for vapers of all preferences. If that wasn’t enough, the screen is actually very useful and easy to read while boost mode makes way for multiple vape styles.
There really is no better device that not only includes all the necessary features but also retains maximum simplicity. First-time vapers should have no qualms about opening the package and having a vape right away with no prior knowledge. All things considered, the Flonq Max Pro improves upon its predecessor in all the ways that matter and then some.
Two popular disposable vaping devices, Hyde IQ and Elf Bar BC5000, each have their faults.
By Mike Huml
The Hyde IQ vs. the Elf Bar BC5000
With vaping continuously rising in popularity, convenience is the name of the game. In particular, disposable devices have quietly begun dominating the market. As with any vaping product, there exists benefits and drawbacks, and as the overall quality of disposable devices has unquestionably been increasing, some drawbacks are inherent to the nature of disposables. Two popular disposable vapes have seen the mitigation of these drawbacks to different extents—the Hyde IQ and the Elf Bar BC5000. Both are similar at first glance, but how do they truly stack up against one another?
Aesthetics
The Elf Bar and the Hyde IQ are similar in size and shape. The Hyde IQ is slightly shorter and wider than the Elf Bar, but both are very lightweight and easy to slip into a pocket or pocketbook. The Hyde IQ features hard plastic all around with some texturing to improve grip. There’s a sticker placed on the front that brands the device “Hyde.” The Elf Bar is also fully plastic with hard plastic on the top and bottom, but the body has a rubberized finish for a better grip. Additionally, the labeling is applied directly to the surface and reads “Elf Bar,” and “BC5000,” followed by the name of the flavor contained within.
Both the Hyde IQ and the Elf Bar are clearly constructed with economy and value in mind, but the Elf Bar edges out the Hyde IQ by presenting a more premium look and feel. It’s more subdued and not as flashy as the Hyde IQ and is likely to appeal to both men and women. While the Elf Bar favors pastel colors and a softer aesthetic, the Hyde IQ leans into a Hot Wheels car-type appearance and color scheme. While the Hyde IQ may stand out from the rest on the shelf, there are certainly more important features other that looks when it comes to any vapor product.
Battery
For many vapers, neither the Hyde IQ nor the Elf Bar will last all day on a single charge, but they’re not far off. The Elf Bar contains a 650 mAh battery while Hyde has not revealed the battery specifications. From a subjective standpoint, the Elf Bar does last considerably longer than the Hyde IQ, but it also takes longer to charge. With an empty battery, the Hyde can charge to full in approximately 15 minutes while the Elf Bar can take up to 30 minutes. What’s more, the Hyde IQ has passthrough functionality, allowing it to be used while it’s connected to the charger. The Elf Bar does not offer this feature.
Normally, the trade-off here would be obvious—longer battery life versus faster charging—which is a wash and a matter of personal preference. However, due to the lack of passthrough functionality in the Elf Bar, the Hyde IQ takes the point in this category. Although the battery charges remarkably quickly, that means that passthrough functionality isn’t needed for the most part. Ironically, the device that would benefit most from passthrough functionality is the one that does not have it—the Elf Bar.
Capacity
Both the Hyde IQ and the Elf Bar boast 5,000 puffs, but something doesn’t quite add up. The Elf Bar contains 13 mL of e-liquid while the Hyde IQ only contains 8 mL. On paper, that information may lead one to believe that the Elf Bar perhaps hits a little warmer, but that is not the case. Both devices are very similar in terms of vapor production and heat, but the Hyde IQ does come off as slightly warmer with a bit more vapor.
Without a puff counter, it’s nearly impossible to determine the actual number of puffs in each device, but subjectively, the Elf Bar lasts longer before needing to be discarded and replaced. With a slightly smoother vape experience and larger capacity, this makes perfect sense. As such, the Elf Bar comes out on top.
Extra features
Fancy features are usually an afterthought when it comes to disposables as they tend to bloat the price and take away from the simplicity of such devices. However, in this case, the Hyde IQ offers a few things that are useful and unique.
First, the Hyde IQ features adjustable airflow. A sliding switch on the bottom of the device allows for a narrow range of airflow adjustments, but there is a range nonetheless. The Elf Bar has nothing to compare. Granted, the airflow is smooth and the amount of air is just right for mouth-to-lung vaping, but it might not be for everyone.
The Hyde IQ also features 2 LEDs that change color to indicate remaining battery life as well as remaining e-liquid. This is extremely helpful to avoid a surprise dry hit when there’s no e-liquid remaining and to give the user a heads-up when a charge is needed. Now, these lights are not 100 percent accurate nor consistent. The Hyde IQ’s e-liquid light will often begin to blink, indicating there is less than 15 percent e-liquid remaining, but continues to work properly for quite a while. It’s by no means perfect, but it does offer a very general idea as to how much juice is left. Anything is better than guessing.
The battery life indicator is much more reliable than the e-liquid light, likewise turning from green to yellow to red, then to blinking red at critical levels. It’s simple and effective, and having some idea as to the remaining battery life is a fantastic quality-of-life feature, particularly for devices with smaller batteries like disposables.
The Hyde IQ takes the point in this category. Although the airflow adjustment is rudimentary and the indicator lights can be somewhat less than accurate, it’s nice to be able to adjust the airflow according to user preference and to have some level of confirmation when it comes to the battery and reservoir.
Vape quality and flavors
Flavors are highly subjective, and every vaper has their own tastes and preferences. Both the Hyde IQ and the Elf Bar have lots of flavors to choose from, although the Elf Bar has a few more than the Hyde IQ. In general, the Hyde IQ will offer flavors that are more robust while the Elf Bar’s flavors are more subtle. Both devices’ flavor descriptions match the actual taste to a large degree—if you order spearmint, it will taste like spearmint.
As for overall vape quality, there are some slight differences between the Elf Bar and the Hyde IQ. The Hyde IQ is a bit warmer with greater throat hit. It’s punchy, and the flavors shine very apparently. This results in great amounts of flavorful vapor, which doesn’t necessarily require long drags. On the other hand, the Elf Bar’s flavors are more nuanced, and the vapor is cooler and smoother. Neither is objectively better than the other, but there are differences, nonetheless.
In addition, the Elf Bar never floods or gurgles whereas the Hyde IQ can, potentially, when left on its side or when its e-liquid is running on empty. This clears up after a drag or two and doesn’t seem to cause leaking or spitback, but it can still be annoying when it happens. With the charging port located on the bottom of the device, some gurgling is likely to be experienced after charging the Hyde IQ since it cannot stand upright while it is charging.
All other things being equal, this slight flooding isn’t a deal breaker. However, the Elf Bar does pull slightly ahead due to this. For fans of warmer and harsher vapes, it’s still worth going with the Hyde IQ despite this small issue.
Value
The Hyde IQ and the Elf Bar both retail for between $15 and $30 depending on the retailer. In terms of best bang for the buck, the Elf Bar wins outright. It contains 13 mL of e-liquid compared to the Hyde IQ’s 8 mL and houses a larger battery. On the other hand, the Elf Bar is missing all the features that make the Hyde IQ unique—adjustable airflow, battery and e-liquid LED indicators and passthrough functionality. So in terms of pure value, the Elf Bar offers the most nicotine for the money while forgoing all the bells and whistles.
Overall
Between the Elf Bar and the Hyde IQ, there really is no clear winner. For a slightly smoother and more consistent vape at the best value, the Elf Bar is the way to go. For a bit more fine-tuning and peace of mind along with a hotter, throatier vape, the Hyde IQ is the better option.
Either way, both devices satisfy the ever-popular need for a quality vape experience with minimal fuss. Smaller pod systems and disposables require bulk purchasing or frequent stops at the vape store whereas these larger 5,000-puff devices can last 3 days to a week without breaking a sweat. The Elf Bar and the Hyde IQ both offer similar experiences with subtle differences, but as is always the case with vaping, it will ultimately be up to the user which device is best for them.
Concept Photo of Huachengda Precision cotton products (Credit: Huachengda Precision)
Flavor bans are challenging e-liquid and hardware manufacturers to produce adaptive products.
By Ellesmere Zhu, 2Firsts
Since China’s e-cigarette control measures took effect on Oct. 1, 2022, consumers can legally purchase only tobacco-flavored vapes in that country. Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, several U.S. states and cities have banned flavored e-cigarettes. The European Union passed a ban on flavored heated-tobacco products recently, perhaps signaling what may come for flavored e-cigarettes. The once wide range of flavored electronic nicotine-delivery system (ENDS) products is now rapidly narrowing.
Many industry insiders believe the move to ban flavors could expand globally, pushing tobacco flavors into the mainstream market. The current wave of tobacco flavors are testing the tolerances of both e-liquids and the hardware (vaporizers). Manufacturers are now challenged with producing a flavor that customers are willing to purchase and enjoy in markets where any flavor other than tobacco is outlawed.
Reproducing the taste of traditional tobacco in an e-cigarette is no easy matter. It is one of the major hurdles that many enterprises are working on currently. The key to emulating the flavor and taste of traditional tobacco is the vaporizer (coil), a core component of any e-cigarette product. If a vaporizer manufacturer wants to tackle the flavor challenge, it must focus on hardware and software strength.
Technical Troubles
In the face of the global trend of enforcing tobacco-only flavors, e-cigarette manufacturers are having a difficult time making the transition. Most manufacturers rely on diluted tobacco flavors to help customers who have traditionally preferred fruit flavors through the transition, which results in the homogenization of tobacco-flavored vapes. This has many manufacturers trying to determine what features are necessary for a true tobacco flavor. Complicating the issue, no country regulates which combination of flavors make up a tobacco flavor nor how a tobacco flavor should taste.
A representative from Shenzhen Huachengda Precision Industry Co., a global vaping manufacturer specializing in R&D, says that any juice aiming to achieve a global presence must have several characteristics. High recognition, rich fragrance and superior taste are the key to building memorable experiences for customers while dry burning, burnt core, condensation and exploding juice (spitback) are issues to avoid.
Ceramic wick surface under electron microscope
The vaporizer, meanwhile, should have a stable structure, which can be achieved by proper assembly and material selection. An unstable liquid absorption rate causes dry burning and burnt cores while unstable heating leads to inconsistency of taste.
Currently, the two most popular vaporizer materials on the market are ceramic wick and cotton wick. The current ceramic wick is hard in texture and easy to assemble, but due to technical limitations, its fine and small-size pore textures result in unstable liquid discharge as the juices with a higher viscosity (such as tobacco flavors) cannot flow through smoothly, according to Chen Ping, CEO and chief engineer for Huachengda.
Cottonwick surface under electron microscope
In comparison, the cotton wick is fully permeable and has a larger pore size, which allows the juice to pass smoothly (see Figure 2). However, for all cotton wicks offered on the market today, there is a risk of the wicking being burnt if the temperature on the device is set too high.
“There is a great difference between the characteristics of tobacco-flavored and fruit-flavored e-liquids. If we apply the vaporizer designed for fruit flavor to tobacco flavor, the taste performance and performance of the core is completely different, really an unsatisfactory reproduction of the tobacco flavor,” says Chen. “Taking into consideration the different features between tobacco-flavored and fruit-flavored juice, Huachengda has come up with optimized tobacco flavor through its vaporizers. Ideally, different flavors of juice require different vaporizers, just like one key can only open one lock.”
The Next Generation
After the instability issues are resolved, manufacturers like Huachengda must still find the proper hardware to truly unleash the authentic tobacco flavor in e-liquids. To this end, Chen says his company has invested heavily in R&D. The vaporizer’s structure, materials, formulations and heating element must all be optimized, he explains.
For example, the previous generation of vaporizers were heated by wires, causing overheating, scorching and even burning. However, the heating element comprising a mesh coil can heat the core evenly, thus producing a richer vapor. It has a solid structure that is not easy to burn off, and the flavor can still be maintained at the initial level of quality over long periods of use, according to Chen.
Looking forward on the path of innovation, Huachengda has been developing its new “fiber wick” for which the company applied for a patent in 2021. The manufacturing process of the fiber core is to break the fiber into a pulp and then “stick it together” with a binder to ensure the consistency of the material while improving uniformity, stability and vaporization, according to the company.
However, there is still room for improvement in this technology. When mixed with e-liquid, the fiber wick will absorb the juice and expand gradually. This affects the liquid absorption speed. More performance and material testing are needed before the technology can be applied on a mass scale. As for now, Huachengda has COTTONX, a larger coil that is suitable for disposable e-cigarettes, and its still-in-development fiber wick, a smaller, more compact coil suitable for pod system ENDS products.
“Improving the user experience has always been the focus of the entire industry,” says Chen, adding that a good example is how cotton dividers on the edge of coils were designed to prevent leakage; however, consumers complain of waste because it would absorb some of the liquids. The need to limit wasted e-liquid has spurred further innovation.
The development of the vaporizers differs from that of the microchip, clarifies Chen. “For chips, from 10 nm [nanometers] to 5 nm to 2 nm, the smaller the better,” he says. “But for vaporizers, the development direction is still to be explored. We need to develop and customize the products according to specific laws and regulations and user needs in a decentralized manner. This means that only manufacturers with a large pool of technology reserves and strong R&D can go far in this industry.”
Exterior view of Huachengda, a global professional vaporizer manufacturing base
ALD’s new XPLLO offers a quality vaping experience for a large segment of the vapor market.
By Mike Huml
The ALD XPLLO is a straightforward pod system device from ALD. It uses both disposable and refillable pods, leaving either option open according to user preference. For anyone looking for something a little more robust than a disposable without sacrificing ease of use, the XPLLO fits the bill perfectly.
The XPLLO is about average in terms of size compared to similar devices while being slightly heavier than a disposable. This is likely due to higher quality materials and a larger battery that clocks in at 580 mAh. The XPLLO fires a 1.7 ohm heating element at 7.5 watts, so the 580 mAh battery goes a long way due to low current draw. That’s not to say that the vapor is weak—far from it, and without being told the specifications prior, you would never guess it’s only firing at 7.5 watts.
The pod itself holds 2 mL of e-liquid, and the coil cannot be replaced. Once the coil or the pod is used up, the entire pod gets replaced. It’s held in place with relatively strong magnets that yield a slight amount of play but without feeling janky. Pods are secure once installed, and that can be demonstrated by lifting up the XPLLO while gripping only the pod and shaking it a bit. It stays assembled with no issues. Each mod is made out of translucent plastic, so it’s comfortable between the lips or teeth, and remaining e-liquid can be viewed with ease.
The XPLLO has a single button that can be used to fire the device or turn it on or off with five successive clicks. However, the XPLLO is also draw activated, making it a good fit for fans of both types of activation. The body is aluminum, contributing nearly completely to the quality difference between two-piece pod systems like the XPLLO and single-piece plastic disposables. The obligatory LED is included here as well, illuminating when a drag is taken or when the device is powered on or off. The color acts as an indicator as to the remaining battery charge.
Speaking of the battery, at 580 mAh, it can last upward of four hours of use depending on the user’s vaping habits. A USB-C port is located on the tip of the XPLLO, and a full charge can be achieved in under 30 minutes with the right charger or adapter. Thankfully, USB-C ports are becoming more and more common on vapor devices, which not only leads to faster charging and a higher level of compatibility (mobile devices have used USB-C for years) but also alleviates the annoyance of fiddling with the charging cable, flipping it over to make sure it’s oriented correctly.
When it comes to performance, the XPLLO can compete with the best of them. Flavor is crisp and clean, and vapor production is surprisingly robust given the relatively high resistance of the heating element and low power output. No sacrifices were made in the vapor department, but there are huge gains when it comes to battery life. Like other ALD products, vapor is produced effortlessly with no spitback or gurgling. The airflow is perfect for mouth-to-lung vaping, and few people will miss the ability to tweak the airflow.
It can be difficult to stand out in the vapor industry now that pod systems and disposables have saturated the market. At a glance, they can all look very similar to one another. Performance is where the standouts can be seen, and the XPLLO certainly stands out. It offers several options not generally available on disposables, such as the dual-activated switch and power toggle functionality, but remains simple enough that anyone can pick it up and get a fantastic vaping experience with no learning curve.
The XPLLO from ALD represents everything that a pod system should be—simple, reliable and hassle-free. It doesn’t sacrifice an iota of performance or quality to achieve these things. It acts as both a perfect entry point for new vapers and an upgrade for those coming from disposables. It’s also a formidable option for more advanced users who want something quick and easy to carry around when large mods become too cumbersome. It’s a wide and diverse market, and the XPLLO checks many boxes that will appeal to said market.
All in all, the XPLLO represents great value for anyone looking to pick up a pod system. It pulls no punches and sacrifices nearly nothing to provide a convenient, quality and reliable vaping experience for a large segment of the vapor market.
ALD’s Boom Max is a disposable e-cigarette that offers performance, reliability, convenience and value.
By Mike Huml
The Boom Max from ALD is an oversized, lightweight, disposable e-cigarette that offers performance, reliability, convenience and value. It’s the perfect vaping companion for longer outings without the added heft of similar devices.
The Boom Max has a lot going for it despite its simplicity. For starters, it’s diameter is slightly larger than that of a U.S. quarter coin, but it remains lightweight due to a smaller battery. It holds 8 mL of e-liquid but is only equipped with a 400 mAh battery. However, it is rechargeable via a USB-C cable, and this is actually a better scenario than having a larger battery with a smaller e-liquid reserve.
Consider this: Most disposable vapor devices end up sitting on a shelf for a good amount of time and most battery-operated devices don’t ship with a fully charged battery. That means whether by design or by happenstance, the battery in a disposable will deplete faster than the e-liquid, and many disposables are not rechargeable. As a battery sits uncharged and unused, its remaining capacity depletes. So, many unlucky customers end up buying a disposable with a nearly dead battery that cannot be charged. With a USB-C charging port and a modest battery, the Boom Max can be recharged in about 15 minutes, ensuring that the liquid can be fully used up with no wasted juice or money.
A smaller battery is also lighter, and despite the size of the Boom Max, it remains extremely lightweight and manageable with a large e-liquid reservoir. That makes the Boom Max the perfect portable vape, and in this day and age, many people have access to a charger for their mobile devices. With such chargers almost always available at a moment’s notice, the pros of a smaller battery far outweigh the cons and demonstrate good judgment on the part of ALD’s designers.
The performance of the Boom Max is fantastic all around. With a draw-activated switch and a tapered mouthpiece, the Boom Max feels comfortable and easy to use. It never feels like you’re pulling and pulling for anemic vapor production. The built-in 1 ohm heating element fires at 11 watts, and that’s just about perfect for mouth-to-lung vaping. The vapor is warm but not overbearing or harsh, and the flavor is clean and refreshing. There’s no spitback, gurgling or leaking at all, and the entire experience is satisfying and effortless.
Each flavor from ALD, while simple, is infused with a touch of menthol, which really adds to the crisp and refreshing sensation in each drag. While some vapers may not be a fan of menthol, keep in mind that menthol is not mint. Mint has several varieties of specific flavors, but menthol in itself is flavorless. It only provides a cooling sensation, much like capsaicin adds the heat to spicy foods but has no distinct flavor on its own.
As such, menthol pairs perfectly with fruit and beverage flavors as these are generally consumed cold. As you’re vaping Blueberry Ice, for example, you’re not tasting minty blueberries. Instead, you’re tasting crisp, fresh blueberries. Out of all the flavors sampled from ALD, none of them missed the mark. Naturally, each person has their own flavor preferences, but each flavor is accurate to the description.
Many fans of disposable vapes, particularly the large disposables advertising 3,000 puffs or more, have complained of these devices only lasting a day or two before the “massive” battery dies while they were expecting to get a week of use. Sometimes a simple solution is the best solution, as demonstrated by the Boom Max. Why offer a battery that can provide 3,000 puffs that never comes fully charged when you can cut the weight almost in half with a smaller battery and make it rechargeable? This is the main advantage of the Boom Max over the competition.
The Boom Max looks simple and unassuming, performs great and holds a lot of liquid—but so do many other devices. Many of those devices fall short in the convenience department, however, since customers pay a premium, expecting to use their device for a week but only getting a day or two. As the playing field levels out in terms of vape quality, convenience will become the deciding factor for many vapers, and the Boom Max is the epitome of convenience.
The lightweight nature and foolproof operation of the Boom Max make it an easy sell for anyone just wanting to pick up a disposable, crack open the box and start vaping. It’s weightless in a pocket or pocketbook, comes with 8 mL of great-tasting liquid and can be recharged as many times as necessary. Overall, the Boom Max is exactly what most disposable vapers are looking for as a daily driver.
A passenger was seriously injured on an Air France flight when an e-cigarette caught fire mid-flight, authorities said.
France’s aviation authority, the Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety, said on Thursday it had opened an investigation into an incident on board a November 2 Air France flight from Malaga, Spain to Paris, France, according to Insider.
The bureau said one person had been seriously injured after an e-cigarette caused a lithium battery fire as the plane was coming in to land. Cabin crew was able to extinguish the fire using a “dedicated kit.”
Authorities are investigating the incident.
E-cigarettes are allowed on flights by both European and U.S. authorities as long as they are kept in carry-on luggage.
GeekVape’s new Aegis Max 2 retains all that made prior mods desirable and improves upon the nitpicks.
By Mike Huml
GeekVape is at it again with even more refinement and improvements to this latest version of the ever-popular Aegis series of mods. The Aegis Max 2 (also referred to as the GeekVape Max 100) is the king of intermediate mods, with a plethora of features for more advanced users and enough simplicity for the intermediate crowd. GeekVape took the already fantastic Aegis Max and somehow made it even better.
The Aegis Max 2 is a single-battery mod that can fire atomizers from 0.1 ohm to 3 ohms up to 100 watts. By default, it requires a 21700 or 20700 battery, but an included adapter makes it possible to use an 18650 as well. Batteries can be swapped and charged via the screw-on battery door at the bottom of the device or charged internally through the use of a USB-C port.
The traditional three-button setup is used here, with an additional slider on the side of the device to toggle the firing lock. The screen has been upgraded to color and displays the usual information at a glance: remaining battery life, resistance of the attached atomizer, power/temperature setting, amperage and voltage output, and a puff counter.
The Aegis Max 2 is available in a variety of colors and comes as a standalone mod or in a kit with the latest GeekVape Z (Zeus) sub-ohm tank. The kit also includes a USB charging cable, replacement glass, too many O-rings to count, the 18650 battery adapter, a tool to help with coil removal, and a 0.2 ohm dual-coil replacement coil. The GeekVape Z also comes with a 0.2 ohm mesh coil preinstalled.
What has always set GeekVape mods apart is the aesthetic and build quality. This masterpiece of leather, silicone and metal looks and feels rugged with a more streamlined, squared-off look compared to its predecessor. It’s also water resistant, impact resistant and dust resistant.
The overall size has also been toned down slightly, which actually provides a more secure fit for the battery. The connection supports a flush fit for atomizers with diameters up to 25 mm, down from the oversized 30 mm connector featured in the previous generation. The matching tank tapers down to 24 mm at its base and looks fantastic atop the Max 2.
In terms of features, the Aegis Max 2 is all encompassing. It has the capability to fire in power mode, with or without a custom power curve. It can make use of temperature-sensing wire such as nickel and stainless steel, again with custom TCR curves for other types of wire, from 100 degrees Celsius to 315 degrees Celsius or 200 degrees Fahrenheit to 600 degrees Fahrenheit.
It also has the often-neglected bypass mode for users who want to use the natural battery voltage, similar to unregulated mods. Each of the aforementioned settings can be tweaked and customized using the in-mod menu and the three buttons. Many of these settings are for niche users with specific tastes, but the option is there for anyone to experiment with.
For most users, they simply want to fill a tank, choose their wattage and vape. That’s definitely possible on the Max 2. For all the intricate settings available, they can all be ignored or utilized at the users’ leisure, conveniently hidden from anyone who simply doesn’t care. It’s the best of both worlds as the potentially confusing nature of menus and button combinations needn’t hinder the experience of those looking for something simple.
There are three distinct ways to lock the device, thankfully none of them are redundant. As per usual, five clicks of the fire button will turn the device off (or on), preventing settings from being changed and the device from firing. By holding the plus and minus buttons simultaneously, the power setting becomes locked, allowing the device to fire but preventing accidental changes to the power or temperature settings.
Lastly, the slider on the side will prevent the device from firing and the settings from being changed without powering down. It’s a most welcome addition, completely negating the frustrating experience of trying to click the fire button five times only to not have the command actually register. What’s more, the Max 2 powers itself back on once the battery has been replaced, so the generally horrible five-click on-off feature never needs to be used again if the user so wishes.
The battery door has also been markedly improved over the original Aegis Max. Over time, that battery door could easily become cross-threaded. Due to the battery having more wiggle room, it could become difficult to determine when the battery door was adequately screwed in. With the Max 2, however, the battery door catches much more easily and has a distinct stopping point to prevent overtightening. Additionally, the battery door is recessed only by about half a millimeter to the point that it looks like a flush fit but doesn’t ever protrude past the base of the mod. The tighter tolerances have undoubtedly led to a more consistent and less fiddly experience.
The charging port has also been redesigned. The Aegis Max 1 had a small silicone plug on the side of the device that could be difficult to remove, and once it was removed, it revealed a micro-USB port. Now with the Max 2, a USB-C charging port has replaced the obsolete micro-USB connector, and it’s been relocated to the top of the mod. A large silicone flap sits right above the fire button and is effortless to remove with the thumb that’s also used to fire the mod.
Speaking of the fire button, it still retains a rocker shape but has been elongated to better fit the thumb and made to be more clicky and less mushy. The plus and minus buttons are also two parts of the same single button and sit side by side instead of over-under. Overall, the above changes not only improve the aesthetic of the Aegis Max 2 but also the functionality, ease of use and “feel.”
The included tank, the GeekVape Z, is more or less the same as it’s ever been—fantastic. It’s top filling and top-down in terms of airflow and provides copious amounts of vapor and flavor for a wide range of power settings. Even upon the initial fill, it primes quickly, with zero break-in time. It holds a respectable 5.5 mL of e-liquid and is relatively compact given the amount of e-liquid that it holds.
What’s especially nice is that the bubble glass doesn’t protrude very far, and the tank section is relatively lengthy. That means it has a higher chance of surviving if it tips over and doesn’t look ridiculous while still providing a substantial capacity. Being that the tank uses top-down airflow, it will never leak out the bottom and make a mess in the event of flooding.
At worst, it will produce some spitback and need to be turned upside down and cleared to return it to full working order. It also means that the mod and hands are spared from condensation and spittle that tend to accumulate around the atomizer with tanks that opt for bottom-up airflow. Additionally, the airflow ring turns smoothly with hard stops on either end while providing a wide range of airflow options from restricted to wide open. Mouth-to-lung vaping is out of the question for all intents and purposes, but that’s why the mod is also available solo without the tank.
All in all, the GeekVape Aegis Max 2 retains all the things that made prior mods desirable and improves upon all the small nitpicks. The improved charging port and its location, the tightened-up battery cap, the new slider lock, the much more reasonable 25 mm 510 connector base, the refined buttons—all these things come together to make the Aegis Max 2 a full-blown upgrade to the Aegis Max 1.
Not to mention the general size and shape that favors lean, efficient functionality and appearance in lieu of girth and bulk. The Aegis Max 2 makes much better use of the space available, offering a 21700 mod that could pass for an 18650 device. The downside of that extra boost in power and battery life has always been size, but that downside is virtually nonexistent with the Aegis Max 2.
The Aegis Max 2 can be purchased for $50 to $70 at retail, making it one of the best bangs for the buck out there. While at least one battery is required to be purchased separately, increasing the total investment, an external charger isn’t necessary.
For anyone looking to upgrade to a proper mod or anyone looking for something that just looks and feels great with all the advanced features in a compact package that can be taken out for the day with minimal hassle, the Geekvape Aegis Max 2 is best-in-class. GeekVape retains its track record of offering top-quality products that look and perform like no other while keeping things affordable.
The new FEELM Max line has the potential to make a significant difference if it’s given a chance.
By Mike Huml
In this second edition of our two-part series on FEELM, a subsidiary of Smoore International, the FEELM Max line introduces the first ceramic coil disposable device to the market. FEELM Max refers to an entire potential range of new disposables using FEELM technology, but this review will focus on the two primary designs. To keep things simple given these two products have not officially been named, they’ll be designated the Large and Small for the remainder of this review.
Keep in mind that what’s happening within these devices is the important part—aesthetics are important too, but FEELM ceramic coil technology can be incorporated into many different future designs.
That being said, let’s talk about the differences in shape and size between the Large and Small as the vape experience is, for all intents and purposes, identical. Obviously, the Large is larger than the Small. It’s longer by roughly a centimeter and about 50 percent wider in terms of diameter. The Large features a flat plastic mouthpiece while the Small makes use of a round silicone mouthpiece that allows for biting and hands-free vaping.
Both devices are cylindrical with an anodized aluminum body that’s resistant to fingerprints. Overall, the Large is comparable to a short cigar and the Small is just small enough to be handled like an analog cigarette. The Large would be better suited to a vaper looking to maximize their puff count, and the Small would be more appealing to those who prioritize the familiar hand feel of a traditional cigarette.
In terms of auxiliary features, neither the Large nor the Small have any. Being disposable devices, adjustable airflow, adjustable juice flow and the ability to refill and recharge are nonexistent. There is also no manual switch, and both devices are 100 percent draw activated, and the tips illuminate white when a draw is taken. That isn’t to say that extravagant features are needed here. The fact that disposable devices such as the FEELM Max line represent the fastest-growing segment of the vapor market should say something about the convenience factor of being able to remove a vapor device from the packaging and begin using it immediately.
What really sets FEELM Max apart from other disposable devices is the overall vape quality and consistency. Each puff is exactly the same from start to finish, and the flavor is very clean without any residual taste from machine oils, imperfect coil construction or inadequate wicking. Disposables have historically been synonymous with low quality, but that isn’t the case for FEELM Max. These devices can hold their own against any mouth-to-lung device available, and that includes rebuildables.
While the customization factor is naturally nowhere to be found, the vast majority of nicotine users want something that they can pick up in a store as they would a pack of cigarettes and begin using right away without any fuss. Many people have been turned off from e-cigarettes over the years simply because the best vapes were too complicated and the most convenient vapes suffered from too many drawbacks. The FEELM Max line puts punctuation on many years of refinement for disposable devices.
There are several factors contributing to the outstanding vape quality of the FEELM Max, the first being the ceramic heating element. Known colloquially as the “coil,” this ceramic heating element is rough and porous, which yields an enormous amount of surface area in a small package. More surface area translates into smaller aerosolized particles that are smoother on the throat and more quickly absorbed into the lungs.
Satisfying the nicotine craving more quickly is always a good thing, but the benefits of ceramic heating elements don’t end there. A larger surface area means that heat isn’t concentrated at a single point and is instead spread out for more uniform heating. This produces a more consistent vape experience and eliminates potential hotspots and burning.
The FEELM Max takes it one step further and features “terraced” temperature that accentuates certain flavors at different points. This means that each type of flavor profile (menthol, fruit, etc.) performs differently at different temperatures. FEELM’s Flavor-Lock technology incorporates heating elements with separate zones of temperature so that each flavor can be experienced optimally. To put it in layman’s terms, the flavor is crisper and more consistent with FEELM heating elements compared to traditional coils, especially those found in most other disposables.
FEELM ceramic coils also increase efficiency. Each puff consumes less e-liquid while at the same time producing an equivalent amount of or more vapor. Along with an efficient battery, this means that when compared to any other disposable of equal size using traditional coils, the FEELM Max will flat-out last longer. As is clearly demonstrated by the Large and Small, this increased level of efficiency can be incorporated into smaller devices to make them more viable and convenient or into a normal-sized device to boost the lifespan.
The Large will last for a full day with extremely heavy use, three to five days for the average user, and upward of a week for light users. Surprisingly, the Small isn’t far behind with an approximately 25 percent shorter lifespan compared to the Large. The average user can expect at least a full day’s use out of the Small and likely more than that, which is impressive for a device smaller than the original eGo. Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that a battery the average size of a cigarette couldn’t last more than an hour or two of consistent use.
Surface area is also the best way to increase vapor production, and the FEELM Max line produces the perfect amount of satisfying vapor. More than that, the vapor is easily produced, which can’t be said for so many other disposable devices. Often, disposables can be anemic in terms of vapor production and harsh on the throat for an assortment of reasons.
With the FEELM Max, a comfortable drag will produce vapor nearly instantly with satisfying volume. There’s no fighting with the device whatsoever, and the importance of this point can’t be overstated. Many potential vapers have given up on vaping after a short time simply because they can’t be bothered. Cigarettes are easy, familiar and don’t require prior knowledge to get them to work correctly. Having easy access to a device that’s actually easier to use than a cigarette and that performs so well right out of the box could very well be a game changer.
Airflow is also a huge factor with any device when it comes to flavor, vapor production and throat hit. Too much airflow and the flavor becomes diluted and the draw is uncomfortable. Too little airflow and the throat hit becomes too harsh, and the risk of spitback increases. Not only does the FEELM Max line have the perfect amount of airflow but also the perfect airflow feel.
The term “turbulence” is often used to describe how the airflow feels, and a turbulent airflow path leads to a “scratchy” sensation when vaping. The level of turbulence experienced with the FEELM Max is minimal. It’s smooth and nearly silent, contributing significantly to that easy and relaxed overall vape experience.
When it comes to vaping, it’s always been a double-edged sword. There is a level of patience required that many people are unwilling or unable to devote to vaping. The more you learn about different devices, features, etc., the more likely you are to enjoy vaping since it’s easier to make informed choices and develop a genuine interest. The level of patience needed has been receding over time, but it’s understandable that many people aren’t looking for a new hobby.
The enthusiast vaper will gladly ensure that the mod is held upright at all times, that at least 120 mL of juice is on hand 24/7 and that two extra batteries are securely stowed in the overhead compartment. It’s a constant struggle of worrying about juice running out, batteries dying, tanks leaking and even pants falling down because the mod is too heavy for the pocket. But the performance is worth it.
Not to mention that toward the beginning of the cloud-chasing era, vaping in public was largely greeted with curiosity and wonder rather than scorn when done with an ounce of common sense and decency. However, it wasn’t unjustified. Disposables and even pod systems just didn’t hit the spot like the good stuff, so that’s what it took to stave off the cigarettes for good for many vapers.
The popularity of vaping is now hitting a fever pitch—the easy and convenient devices such as disposables can be just as good as hobbyist-level devices. That in itself will retain new adopters, but even for longtime vapers there can be a sense of relief knowing that when the occasion calls for it, they can take a disposable out for the day and enjoy vaping without having to worry about anything.
That’s really the key to the popularity of pod systems and disposables. There is a certain point that varies for every person where the value of convenience outweighs the promise of performance rather than vice versa. As disposables continue to be improved, innovated and refined, more and more people will find themselves switching off of analogs because they like vaping better than smoking and not necessarily because they’re trying to quit.
Convenience plays an enormous role in the switch from smoking to vaping; there’s likely an alarming number of people who gave up on e-cigarettes because their first starter kit didn’t work correctly, and when the cravings kicked in, it was easier to pick up a pack of smokes. Disposables have been neglected for too long, and for the sake of harm reduction and public health, it’s about time a manufacturer like Smoore gave them the attention they deserve.
The FEELM Max finally bridges the gap between quality and convenience. All the improvements are clearly more than the sum of their parts and don’t necessarily require detailed explanation for the target market. The end result is a worthy vape experience that anybody can pick up, even with no patience or time investment. There’s no airflow ring to fiddle with. There’s no button that powers or fires the device. There’re no graphs or meters or temperature settings. It’s a tube to puff on until it stops puffing.
It works like a cigarette that you don’t have to light. Spitback? Dry hits? Those are antiquated inconveniences—words of a time past. It really gets no simpler, and the FEELM Max satisfies the cigarette craving consistently.
For experienced vapers, there’s no longer a reason to sacrifice performance for convenience. The hobby aspect of vaping will always be there, but now the choice to put it down every now and again is real. Instead of putting up with a cheap disposable while pining for the Kayfun, either can be used without sacrifice, and rebuilding can be done when it’s wanted instead of when it’s needed.
The FEELM Max line has the potential to make a significant difference if it’s given a chance. Disposables have developed a bad reputation and mostly for good reason up until now. This isn’t a “fool me once” situation. This is the fruit of nearly two decades of labor. Many people put everything on the line for vaping and harm reduction so that one day, anybody can easily switch away from smoking by choosing the colorful tubes at the gas station instead of the small stinky ones.
No matter which design, Smoore has something special with the FEELM Max line. It may not look like much, but the trick is to not think about it and just enjoy it. It may feel like a betrayal to lay praise upon a disposable with seemingly nothing to it, but it’s easy to forget that this was always the endgame. Modding, rebuilding, DIY—the impetus for these things was the need to push vaping to be as good or better than smoking. The quality and simplicity of the FEELM Max has reached that point. From here, it’s just diminishing returns.
The button below the screen serves one purpose, and that is to toggle boost mode. When boost mode is activated, the rocket ship icon on the screen will turn from white to red, and the Max Pro will fire at a higher power. The heating element is two mesh coils, so even in boost mode, burning and dry hits are nonissues.
