Tag: news

  • Snowplus its Expands Operations in the Philippines

    Snowplus its Expands Operations in the Philippines

    Photo: Snowplus

    Snowplus of China is expanding its vaping business in the Philippines, reports The Philippine Star.

    Co-founder and head of overseas markets Derek Li is confident the company can build a good distribution network in the country.

    Snowplus has invested $2 million in quality and safety research since 2019 and has received over $150 million in financing, which is among the largest funding for any startup in the e-cigarette industry.

    Snowplus has also committed to raising industry quality and standards to deliver safe and reliable e-cigarettes to consumers in the Philippines.

    In line with new vapor industry regulations in China, Snowplus recently obtained permission to operate from the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration. The license authorizes the company to produce 80 million pods per year.

    The company established three advanced scientific laboratories with equipment to test its products’ power supply and durability, among other characteristics.

    “Consumers can trust Snowplus. We work only with the most reputable partners and deliver products of the highest quality that are 100 percent safe,” Li said.

  • Malaysia Removes NRT, not Vape from Poisons List

    Malaysia Removes NRT, not Vape from Poisons List

    Photo: dalaprod

    Malaysia’s Health Ministry has categorized nicotine-replacement products as nonpoisons to make them more accessible to consumers, reports The New Straits Times.

    Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said the move was done by granting an exemption to nicotine under the Poisons Act 1952 for products in the form of patches or gum registered under the Control of Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations 1984.

    “This exception is expected to help smokers, who are motivated to quit smoking, in dealing with the withdrawal symptoms,” said Khairy.

    At present, smokers who want to quit smoking have limited access to nicotine-replacement products as they are regulated under the Poisons Act 1952.

    Under the law, nicotine is classified as a “Group C poison” and can be dispensed only by licensed pharmacists or registered medical practitioners.

    The New Straits Times article made no mention of nicotine vapor products, which tobacco harm reduction advocates consider to be the most effect nicotine-replacement products on the market.

    Malaysian lawmakers are currently considering the Control of Tobacco Product and Smoking Bill 2022, which, among other measures, would ban the sale of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to anyone born after 2007.

  • FDA, Hyde Bar Disagree on MDO; Puff Bar Defiant

    FDA, Hyde Bar Disagree on MDO; Puff Bar Defiant

    Credit: Jean Claude

    It shouldn’t be this complicated. Magellan Technology says it didn’t receive a marketing denial order (MDO). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says it did. It wouldn’t be the first time the regulatory agency made a mistake. The FDA seems to be making a habit of it recently.

    Magellan claims that the FDA made a “glaring error” and the company did not receive an MDO for its 32 products under the Hyde brand. In an email, Jon Glauser, CEO of Magellan, stated that the FDA’s announcement is false for two reasons. First, the regulatory agency only issued the company a Refuse to Accept (RTA) letter and, second, the FDA failed to conduct a proper review of Magellan’s scientific evidence in its premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) review for its Hyde products.

    “Contrary to the FDA’s statement, FDA only issued a Refuse to Accept letter for the identified Magellan products, not an MDO,” stated Glauser. “A Refuse to Accept letter is a refusal based on nothing more than a technical review of the applications’ contents which, in this case, was a missing document, i.e., a sworn certification related to the translation of certain components of the application. In other words, the Refusal to Accept was based on bureaucratic technicalities.

    “This is much more than a misnomer or clerical error by the FDA since the agency elaborated that it had conducted a scientific review and reached a conclusion that the PMTAs ‘lacked sufficient evidence.’ However, no such scientific review was referred to and no scientific justification was provided in FDA’s correspondence today.”

    Magellan currently has pending litigation against the regulatory agency with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals concerning an MDO issued  by the FDA last year for Magellan’s pod-based Juno vaping products.

    New FDA data from the 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) shows that 2.5 million U.S. youth use e-cigarettes, according to the published findings in the Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report released by the FDA in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This is a slight rise over last year’s data.

    Armed with this information, the FDA also issued Puff Bar (no relation to Magellan products) a warning letter for receiving and delivering e-cigarettes in the U.S. without a marketing authorization order. The FDA also requested a response within 15 working days of receiving the letter, detailing how the company intends to address the FDA’s concerns.

    It’s at least the second letter the FDA has sent to Puff Bar without any follow-up action. The FDA issued at least two warning letters for Puff Bar’s non-tobacco nicotine disposable products.

    During a Next Generation Nicotine Conference in Miami, Patrick Beltran, CEO of Puff Bar, said his disposable products were the “end of the road” for vaping products. “This is the end of the road for vaping in my opinion. It doesn’t get any more convenient for the consumer than a disposable vape device.”

    Beltran then blamed U.S. retailers and Chinese manufacturers for the youth initiation issues. “We’re pioneering the disposable industry and the disposable sector of this industry, and it’s very tough when I go to the store and I see people and I see these brands being pushed and there is no enforcement whatsoever,” he explained. “I have to go … I have to spend millions of dollars on a PMTA. Juul, [expletive] Juul, and I’m sure everyone here has heard the news what happened … It’s all [expletive],” referring to Juul’s MDO that the FDA later retracted.

    During GTNF 2022, a nicotine industry conference held in Washington D.C. in September, Brian King, director of the the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, the division charged with regulating next-generation tobacco products, discussed the FDA’s ability to force companies to comply with its MDOs (and warning letters). So far, very few companies that have been told to remove their products from the market have complied (including Puff Bar). King said the agency has multiple enforcement options to bring both manufacturers and retailers to heel.

    “We have several tools available to us, including advisory actions,” he said. “We also have regulatory enforcement actions, including voluntary recalls as well as various other requested recalls. We can also take administrative action, civil money penalties (in terms of manufacturers, that penalty cannot exceed $15,000 for any single violation or $1 million for any number of violations related to a single action),” explained King. “When it comes to judicial action, we can do seizure, injunction and also criminal prosecution. I will say that when it comes to enforcement and compliance, nothing is off the table.”

    The FDA has not taken any serious action against any vaping company for  violating it’s orders. Puff Bar products can still be found at retailers across the U.S., even though the company has received multiple warning letters from the FDA.

    Puff Bar has not received an MDO from the regulatory agency to date.

    After reviewing PMTAs for 32 Hyde e-cigarettes, however, the FDA issued MDOs for the applications submitted by Magellan (the company argues they were actually RTAs). In conducting its scientific review, the FDA determined that the applications lacked “sufficient evidence demonstrating that the products would provide a benefit to adult users that would be adequate to outweigh the risks to youth.”

    No Hyde products have received marketing authorization orders from the FDA.

    “To be sure, the FDA expressly wrote to Magellan that ‘The absence of these required FDA forms impedes FDA ingestion and processing of applications.’ In other words, FDA could not have conducted any scientific review because it refused to accept the application,” wrote Glauser. “Our counsel has demanded that FDA not only retract the press statement it made but also issue a corrective statement making clear that FDA did not issue an MDO to Magellan and that it has not yet conducted a scientific review of Magellan’s products.”

    The FDA has a history of making mistakes in the PMTA process. It’s currently facing more than 20 lawsuits and has had to retract MDOs from numerous companies, including Juul Labs, Turning Point Brands and Kavial Brands, among others.

    “Magellan Technology looks forward to addressing whatever administrative technicalities are present so that FDA can, in fact, conduct a full scientific review of its products,” wrote Glauser.

  • Juul Labs Bankruptcy Conjecture Continues to Grow

    Juul Labs Bankruptcy Conjecture Continues to Grow

    Credit: Vitalii Vodolazskyi

    Juul Labs may be preparing to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, according to reports by Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal and a tweet by Reorg reporter Harvard Zhang.

    The vaping company has reportedly received inquiries from lenders and will soon formally request debtor-in-possession financing options.

    “We will continue the preparation process for both a restructuring and other strategic options as we determine what path is best for our company,” a Juul spokesman said on Oct. 4.

    Chapter 11 allows a company to continue operating while it works with a court and its creditors to reorganize its finances. It doesn’t necessarily herald the end of the company.

    A pioneer in the vaping business, Juul Labs has gone from dominating the U.S. e-cigarette market to fighting for its survival in a relatively short time.

    Following its initial success, the company quickly came under regulatory scrutiny over its marketing practices. Critics blame Juul Labs for contributing to an “epidemic” of underage vaping.

    Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Juul over the past several years, alleging that the company marketed its e-cigarettes to children. Juul has said it never marketed to underage users.

    In June, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered Juul’s products off the market, then stayed the decision pending Juul’s appeal.

    Last month, Juul agreed to pay at least $438.5 million in a settlement with more than 30 states.

    The uncertainty over Juul’s ability to remain on the market could make it difficult for the vaping company to raise money or secure traditional loans to pay for legal settlements or court judgments.

    In September, Juul’s largest shareholder, Altria Group, terminated its noncompete agreement with Juul. Altria’s decision gives Juul more options to secure its business, including the freedom to sell itself—or a significant stake—to one of Altria’s competitors.

    The rumors about a possible Juul bankruptcy are not new. Clive Bates, director of The Counterfactual, described them as a “nothing burger with a side of thin air.”

    “It has been obvious since @FDA maliciously denied Juul’s marketing application that Chapter 11 is a possibility,” Bates wrote in a tweet. “The ‘scoop’ is that this has not changed.”

  • Nov. 18 is New Date for UKVIA Forum and Dinner

    Nov. 18 is New Date for UKVIA Forum and Dinner

    The UKVIA Vaping Industry Forum and Celebration Dinner will now take place on Friday, Nov. 18 at the QEII Centre in Westminster, London. The event had been canceled on Sept. 9, the day after the queen’s passing.

    The agenda remains the same, and the UKVIA expects some additional speakers to be part of the lineup.

    “We have had a fantastic response since the event was canceled, and we are looking to accommodate some additional speakers in our program,” said UKVIA Director General John Dunne in a statement. “We would like to thank delegates, sponsors, exhibitors and dinner guests for their patience, and we look forward to seeing everyone in November at what will be the biggest B2B event in the U.K. vaping calendar.

    “The occasion will be particularly poignant as the original planned forum and dinner came the day after the announcement of the queen’s death. The event will allow us to pay tribute to Britain’s longest reigning monarch.”

    While the original event had been at near full capacity, more tickets for the conference and dinner have now been released.

  • China Rules Make Shops Close, Black Market Growing

    China Rules Make Shops Close, Black Market Growing

    Before China’s national standards were implemented, vape shops were growing rapidly throughout the country. (Photo: Timothy S. Donahue)

    China’s National Standard for Electronic Cigarettes have begun, however, a reporter from Beijing Youth Daily claims many businesses still secretly sell the “fruit flavor” that has been banned from sale, a Chinese news outlet claims.

    The report also states that after the implementation of the national standard several vape shops have closed. A reporter from Beijing Daily visited some e-cigarette sales stores or brand counters on October 2 and found that a small number of stores had been closed, and the words “transfer” were also posted.

    In stores that are still in operation, only an estimated six brands of vaping products are on display, and there only two or three varieties of products. Some stores have seen the increased sale of combustible tobacco products.

    China’s ban on flavored vapor products went into effect on Oct. 1 along with other new vaping product standards that were decided on earlier this year.

    In November 2021, Chinese law was amended to bring the vapor industry under control of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, which regulates China’s tobacco products.

    Products meant for export will not have to meet Chinese standards unless the destination country does not have its own specific standards.

  • Colorado: State Cannot Sue Juul Labs Executives

    Colorado: State Cannot Sue Juul Labs Executives

    Credit: Wirestock

    The Colorado Supreme Court ruled last week that the Colorado Attorney General Office’s lawsuit against electronic cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs cannot include four of the company’s executives.

    The AG’s Office hoped to hold both the company and the four executives liable for alleged deceptive marketing practices which targeted adolescents and teens.

    Colorado filed its lawsuit against the company in 2020 after a yearlong investigation into the company’s advertising downplaying its products’ nicotine concentration and claims that the product was a healthy alternative to traditional cigarette smoking, according to CBS News.

    In the ruling, Justice Richard L. Gabriel wrote that the AG’s Office’s prosecutors provided “no facts supporting a conclusion that any of the defendants expressly aimed their conduct at Colorado.”

    Six of the seven state justices were in agreement with the ruling. The seventh did not participate in the decision.

    “Had the record shown that these defendants individually targeted Colorado, among other states, then our conclusion might have been different,” Gabriel wrote.

    The ruling reversed a district court decision which rejected a request for dismissal by the executives’ attorneys.

  • Qnovia Gets $17 million for RespiRx NRT Nebulizer

    Qnovia Gets $17 million for RespiRx NRT Nebulizer

    Photo: Qnovia

    Qnovia has raised $17 million to continue development of its RespiRx nicotine replacement product, reports Richmond Business Sense.

    RespiRx is a portable, hand-held nebulizer, a powered medical device that delivers medicine as an inhaled mist and is similar to an inhaler. The device is designed to deliver a nicotine hit more quickly than existing therapies, thus enabling users to better manage withdrawals and, therefore, increase the likelihood of smoking cessation.

    Qnovia was founded in 2018 in Los Angeles by Mario Danek as Respira Technologies and rebranded in September. In May, the company appointed former Altria executive Brian Quigley as CEO and Danek as chief technology officer.

    The company also moved to Richmond, Virginia, in part because that state offers a more business friendly environment, according to Quigley, whose tobacco career included a six-year stint as CEO of Altria’s U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. subsidiary.

    In addition, many of the partners the company works with are on the East Coast. Qnovia contracts with a Boston manufacturer to make its device and a firm in Pennsylvania to create the medicine administered through the device.

    Qnovia will use the newly raised funds to develop a proof of concept for RespiRx as a nicotine replacement therapy product and move it through an FDA approval process before the anticipated start of human clinical trials in 2023.

    The product is expected to hit the market as a prescription treatment. Qnovia is also interested in exploring how RespiRx can be used for asthma, pain management, vaccines and other uses.

  • Scotland Urged to Rethink Vape Ad Restrictions

    Scotland Urged to Rethink Vape Ad Restrictions

    Photo: jazrotorman

    The U.K. Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) has called on the Scottish government to reconsider its proposal to tighten advertising restrictions on vaping.

    The call follows the publication of the outcomes of the government’s consultation on the plan. According to the UKVIA, the feedback from the consultation, which involved the input of individuals, local authorities, public health organizations and the vaping community, clearly shows that there is no majority of support for the recommendations put forward by the government, instead dividing opinions and leaving more questions than answers on the future of vaping regulations.

    At the time the consultation went live, the UKVIA warned that the Scottish government’s proposals could derail the country’s 2034 smoke-free ambitions and that its stance is “in denial of the facts,” creating a significant risk to the health of people of Scotland looking to quit smoking as well as more uncertainty around vaping caused by misinformation.”

    The proposals that were put forward only sought to further conflate vaping with combustible tobacco products by aligning advertising and promotion rules to existing restrictions on tobacco products.

    The UKVIA’s position was echoed by the Scottish Grocer’s Federation, which stated that the Scottish government’s move was unjustified and failed to appreciate the potential benefits of vaping products.

    Many proposals put forward by the government generated 50-50 responses, and a number resulted in more respondents disagreeing than agreeing with them. These included proposals to ban in-store promotional displays, to make free distribution and nominal pricing of vaping products an offense and to make sponsorship agreements in respect to vaping products an offense. A higher proportion of respondents indicated that the proposed policy would have a negative impact on individuals (50.5 percent who felt it would versus 36.9 percent who didn’t) and on those with socioeconomic disadvantages (48.6 percent versus 25.5 percent).

    “The proposals that were put forward only sought to further conflate vaping with combustible tobacco products by aligning advertising and promotion rules to existing restrictions on tobacco products,” said John Dunne, director general of the UKVIA, in a statment.

    “Only by working with others, following the evidence and listening to people’s testimonies can we succeed in the goal of tobacco harm reduction.

  • European Vape Alliance Opposes Dutch Flavor Ban

    European Vape Alliance Opposes Dutch Flavor Ban

    Photo: Wirestock

    The Independent European Vape Alliance (IEVA) has expressed concerns about the Draft Amendment of the Tobacco and Smoking Products Order for regulation of e-cigarette flavors presented by the Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports.

    According to the statement submitted by the Dutch authorities, the draft amendment intends to ban flavors other than tobacco in e-liquids in order to “reduce the temptation for young people and former smokers to purchase e-cigarettes.” The measure, authorities note, is “justified by the need to protect public health.”

    The proposal also suggest that the Netherlands will be more likely to achieve its objective of a smoke-free generation by 2040 if e-cigarettes are rendered less attractive.

    According to the IEVA, the proposed flavor ban is neither proportional nor necessary, as it is too strong a measure for the objective it seeks to achieve and fails the EU requirement that member states choose the means that least restricts the free movement of goods.

    The IEVA insists that the ban will boost black market activity and jeopardize  tens of thousands of jobs, while leading to a reduction in government revenues by reducing tax collection.