Tag: news

  • China’s Revised E-Cigarette Standards Include Flavor Ban

    China’s Revised E-Cigarette Standards Include Flavor Ban

    Credit: Nikolay N. Antonov

    More than three months ago, China’s Tobacco Monopoly Administration started to solicit opinions from the public on regulating e-cigarettes after the vaping industry was brought under tobacco’s supervision last November. On Friday, the Chinese government published a revised draft of standards for the vaping industry that has sent vaping stocks tumbling.

    In the original proposal, it seemed China was set to allow flavors. However, the new draft underlines the importance of reducing the appeal of e-cigarettes to youth, stating: “Flavors other than tobacco taste shall not be offered in products.” To be specific, 21 additives, referring to tastes like plum, rose and orange, are removed from the list.

    As the some U.S. state and European countries already have flavor bans in place, industry experts believe the new regulations may have a greater impact on domestic market rather than exports, according to Li Qian, writing for Shine.cn.

    In an interview with Securities Times, an unnamed industry insider said sales volumes of tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes in the domestic market are dwarfed by other flavors. So it would be “subversive” for the domestic market, he said.

    After the draft was published, shares of RLX Technology, China’s leading e-cigarette maker listed on the New York Stock Exchange, dropped more than 36 percent and closed at $1.49 on Friday.

    The draft is now available on the administration’s website. The administration is asking for public feedback until March 17. If the current draft rule is passed, there will be an end to flavored vaping products in China.

  • Biden Expected to Sign De Facto Synthetic Ban Tuesday

    Biden Expected to Sign De Facto Synthetic Ban Tuesday

    President Biden on Tuesday is expected to sign a $1.5 trillion spending bill that funds the government through September and includes a rider that places synthetic nicotine products under the authority of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Senate passed it late Thursday night by a 68-31 margin. Biden signed a stopgap measure Friday that averts a partial government shutdown that would otherwise have occurred midnight Friday.

    The rule will become law 30 days after the bill’s signing date. Manufacturers of currently marketed synthetic products would have an additional 60 days to file a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) without being subject to FDA enforcement—unless the FDA has already denied a non-synthetic version of the same product (meaning those manufacturers would be subject to enforcement 30 days after the passage of the bill).

    Azim Chowdhury, a partner with the law firm Keller and Heckman said that the way he interprets the rule is that all synthetic products already on the market or newly marketed within 30 days after the enactment date can continue to be marketed during the 60-day period following the enactment date.

    The language of the Tobacco Control Act would change to define a tobacco product as “any product made or derived from tobacco, or containing nicotine from any source, that is intended for human consumption,” when Biden signs the bill into law.

    Products subject to timely submitted PMTAs can remain on the market for 90 days after the effective date, which is 120 days after enactment. Any product not authorized by FDA within 120 days of enactment must come off the market, according to Chowdhury.

    “We do not anticipate FDA authorizing any synthetic nicotine products by the end of the 90-day period, though they may take another fatal flaw approach to quickly deny applications,” said Chowdhury. “Significantly, the rider in its current form indicates that a synthetic nicotine version of a product that already went through the PMTA process and is subject to a Refuse-to-Accept (RTA), Refuse-to-File (RTF), Marketing Denial Order (MDO), or withdrawal of a marketing order would have to come off the market as of the effective date – i.e., after 30 days of the law’s enactment.

    “In simpler terms, for products that were previously formulated with tobacco-derived nicotine (and the only change was a switch to synthetic nicotine) and whose PMTAs have already been refused or denied, those products will effectively be banned on the effective date (30 days after enactment) with no opportunity to submit a new PMTA. (This is Congress’ way of punishing companies whose PMTAs were denied and then, in their view, sought to circumvent the law by switching to synthetic nicotine).”

    Beyond the PMTA conditions, manufacturers of synthetic nicotine products would be subject to ‘all requirements of the regulations for tobacco products. Chowdhury said he and his team interpret this to include all additional Tobacco Control Act requirements, including tobacco product establishment registration and product listing, ingredient listing, ensuring that labeling is compliant including required warning statements, and health document submissions, among other.

    April Meyers, board president for the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association (SFATA), wrote in a release that her organization is disappointed by the Biden administration’s use of earmarks in a omnibus appropriations bill without giving an adequate amount of time for interested parties to review and discuss the rule.

    She stated that the vaping industry has helped millions of American adult consumers that have relied on flavored vapor products for over a decade to successfully remain combustible tobacco-free.

    “Sadly, it is those consumers who will pay the ultimate price of this legislation,” she said. “Over the last decade of SFATA’s existence, we have fought diligently to keep flavored products accessible to smokers. Any battle lost means consumers are potentially driven back to deadly combustible cigarettes, and therein lies the real tragedy.

    “It is shameful that public health officials prefer to carve legislation with a butcher’s knife, rather than with the skill and precision of a scalpel better served to ensure the nation’s public health.”

  • Australia Urged to Add Vaping to Anti-Smoking Strategy

    Australia Urged to Add Vaping to Anti-Smoking Strategy

    Photo: Zerophoto | Adobe Stock

    Australia is lagging well behind many other countries in the Asia-Pacific region when it comes to successfully tackling smoking through vaping, says the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA).  

    The CAPHRA’s observation comes as Australia’s Department of Health seeks feedback on its Draft National Smoking Strategy 2022–2030, with public submissions closing on March 24.

    “We encourage vapers and supporters of a progressive tobacco harm reduction (THR) approach to have their say. Australians desperate to quit smoking and those keen to stay off deadly cigarettes need all the help they can get,” says Nancy Loucas, executive coordinator of the CAPHRA.

    On Oct. 1, 2021, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration expanded its prescription-only model with customs clamping down at the border on personal imports of nicotine vaping liquids from overseas websites.

    Not only does Australia’s draft strategy ignore the potential of safer nicotine products, it also lacks ambition, according to Loucas. The strategy aims for a smoking rate of 10 percent or less by 2025 while New Zealand is pursuing a 5 percent smoke-free goal and looks on target to achieve it. “Instead of banning vaping, New Zealand has regulated it, making it tough for minors to access but available to all adults keen to keep off the cancer sticks. New Zealand is seeing its overall smoking rate tumble, yet the Australian government fails to accept that the most effective smoking cessation tool available is staring it in the face,” says Loucas.

    “Australia is well down the world rankings when it comes to adopting effective THR policies and is light-years behind the U.S. and U.K. Subsequently, Australia’s overall smoking rate has fallen very little over the past decade, and without reasonable access to vaping, Australia will struggle to even achieve its 10 percent smoking goal,” says Loucas. 

  • FDA Grants Reduced-Exposure Claim to PMI’s IQOS 3

    FDA Grants Reduced-Exposure Claim to PMI’s IQOS 3

    Photo: PMI

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a modified risk granted order authorizing Philip Morris Products to market the IQOS 3 system holder and charger with the following reduced exposure information:

    • The IQOS system heats tobacco but does not burn it.
    • This significantly reduces the production of harmful and potentially harmful chemicals.
    • Scientific studies have shown that switching completely from conventional cigarettes to the IQOS system significantly reduces your body’s exposure to harmful or potentially harmful chemicals.”
    • This reduced exposure information is the same as the information previously authorized by FDA in July 2020 for an earlier version of the device.

    Today’s action follows the FDA’s review of a new modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) application submitted by the company for the IQOS 3 system holder and charger. This MRTP application primarily cross-referenced the supplemental premarket tobacco product application for this device, which was authorized for legal sale and distribution in the United States in December 2020, as well as the MRTP application for the previous version of the device.

    The IQOS 3 device is similar in design to the previous version (with mainly aesthetic changes), uses the same tobacco source, and the company requested to use the same exposure reduction claim as authorized for the previous version of the device. Given these similarities, FDA largely relied on its past evaluations of the IQOS 3 device and previous version of the device in determining that the IQOS 3 device meets the authorization criteria to be marketed as an MRTP.

    Headquartered in Switzerland, Philip Morris is currently banned from importing the product into the United States following an adverse ruling in a patent dispute with BAT’s Reynolds American subsidiary.

    In an interview with Bloomberg, PMI CEO Jack Olczak said the company plans to manufacture IQOS in the U.S. to get around the import ban.

  • Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate E-Cigarette Policy Proposals

    Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate E-Cigarette Policy Proposals

    Credit: Andriano_cz

    A demonstrative policy debate event on whether e-cigarettes should be regulated was held on March 8, 2022, in Taipei, showing how different public policy viewpoints can be rationally discussed, according to The Taipei Times. The debate was held by the Chinese Debate Promotion Association (CDPA) at the Taipei NGO House.

    CDPA Chairman and Founder Chia Pei-te said that the Executive Yuan in January approved a draft amendment to the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act proposed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for legislative review. The proposed regulations on emerging tobacco products have sparked discussions, he said.

    The amendment would classify emerging tobacco products as “tobacco-like products” and “designated tobacco products.” E-cigarettes would be classified as “tobacco-like products” and be fully banned while heated-tobacco products would be classified as “designated tobacco products” and be subject to regulation.

    The reasoning behind banning e-cigarettes includes keeping curious teenagers away from the products, preventing consumers from adding nicotine to e-cigarette e-liquids and lowering the risk of teenage users turning to smoking.

    The debate participants went back and forth discussing the pros and cons of regulating e-cigarettes versus banning them, bringing up subjects such as public health, tax revenue options and teenage use.

    National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Dean Kang Jaw-jou said that he was moved by opinions for and against e-cigarettes. He said the affirmative side proposed to directly manage e-cigarette use through regulations and an approval system while the opposing side stressed their attitude to life—banning a substance if the public consensus deems it harmful to society.

    Many aspects of the topic can be argued, but e-cigarettes can cause negative health effects, and supporters and opponents must clearly present this fact to the public in further discussions, stated Wang Hsiang-tsui, NYCU Faculty of Pharmacy associate professor.

  • NYTS: Massive Declines in Smoking Rates Continue

    NYTS: Massive Declines in Smoking Rates Continue

    Youth cigarette smoking rates in the United States are at historically low levels, with just 1.9 percent of high school students reporting current use of cigarettes, according to the National Youth Tobacco Survey 2021.

    The NYTS found 2.55 million middle-school and high school students in the United States used tobacco products in 2021, according to figures released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the 2020 results, the agency estimated 4.5 million tobacco users among middle school and high school students nationally, down from 6.2 million in 2019.

    If the report is accurate, tobacco use among teens nationally declined by more than 40 percent from 2020 to 2021. That would be largest decline in the history of the NYTS.

    E-cigarettes were the most popular tobacco product among middle school and high school students in 2021, with an estimated 2 million users, the report found. Puff Bar was the popular brand. That is expected to change next year after Congress passed a rule the same day the study was released that gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authority over synthetic nicotine products. That rule requires manufacturers of synthetic nicotine products to file a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) with the FDA within 90 days.

    An estimated 400,000 of students in the middle-high school age range smoked traditional cigarettes, while approximately 380,000 used cigars. Roughly 240,000 used smokeless tobacco, while 220,000 used hookahs and 200,000 tried nicotine pouches, according to the report.

    Although the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration “remain confident in our study results,” the survey was conducted online, the agencies have again said that this year’s results cannot be compared to previous years. However, both the 2019 and 2020 surveys were conducted primarily on school campuses, the agencies said.

  • Smoore Launches Risk-Assessment Lab for EU’s TPD

    Smoore Launches Risk-Assessment Lab for EU’s TPD

    Credit: TPD

    An industry-leading risk assessment laboratory for compliance of the European Union Tobacco Product Directive (TPD) has been launched by one of China’s largest vapor manufacturers. Shenzhen-based Smoore has become China’s first company capable of providing vaping products with a one-stop TPD risk assessment service, according to a company press release. A division of Smoore’s fundamental research center, the laboratory will be a hub to empower more vaping brands to comply with the safety standards of TPD.

    “This laboratory has begun operation in the first half of 2021, and already completed 52 product tests for several world-leading vape brands. As China’s first corporate TPD-compliant risk assessment laboratory, it can generate test reports within 5 working days,” the release states. “Its laboratory equipment is benchmarked against those in world-class analytical testing laboratories, such as Labstat and Enthalpy.”

    Smoore’s fundamental research center has developed a comprehensive analytical testing and risk assessment system, covering PMTA non-clinical testing and health risk assessment. Accredited by China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS) in 2019, the lab is capable of up to 149 CNAS tests, involving the chemical analysis of e-liquids and aerosols, electrical safety, material safety and battery safety.

    With only one e-cigarette approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration through the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) pathway to date, more and more vape brands are aiming for expansion in the European market. Smoore states that the EU is a “relatively friendly regulatory environment and significant market potential.”

    “As the industry’s harm reduction and quality benchmark, Smoore complies with its in-house Smoore 3.0 safety standards. Based on the risk assessment guidance of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and PMTA, Smoore 3.0 covers all of the PMTA vapor safety tests and Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) listed by U.S. FDA,” the release states. “In addition to vapor safety, Smoore 3.0 also involves extractable and leachable substances of medical-grade atomization materials.”

    Since FEELM, Smoore’s flagship atomization technology brand, entered the EU market in 2018, Smoore has been in partnership with several leading vape brands in this EU region, including Vuse, HEXA, Innocigs and Alfapod. To date, vaping products loaded with FEELM technologies have been exported to Belgium, Netherlands, Estonia, and Romania, with market leadership in the UK, Germany and France, the release states.

  • RLX Technology Net Revenue Sees Growth in 2021

    RLX Technology Net Revenue Sees Growth in 2021

    Net revenues of RLX Technology increased by 123.1 percent to RMB8.52 billion ($1.34 billion) in fiscal year 2021. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net revenues from sales to offline distributors, which was mainly attributable to the expansion of the company’s distribution and retail network (China banned internet sales of vapor products in October 2019).

    Gross profit increased by 140.4 percent to RMB3.67 billion while gross margin increased to 43.1 percent from 40 percent in the prior year.

    For the fourth quarter of 2021, RLX Technology reported net revenues of RMB1.9 billion, up 17.7 percent from the comparable 2020 quarter. Gross margin was 40.2 percent, compared with 42.9 percent in the same period of 2020.

    “We are pleased with our operational and financial performance in the fourth quarter, ending 2021 on a strong note. Despite the evolving industry regulatory framework and challenging backdrop of recurrent Covid-19 outbreaks, we remained focused throughout the year on optimizing our distribution and retail channels, investing in scientific research, new product development, and digitalization upgrades,” said Ms. Ying (Kate) Wang, co-founder, chairperson of the board of directors and CEO of RLX Technology, in a statement.

    “The 2021 fiscal year was defined by year-over-year revenue growth of 123.1 percent, further cementing our leadership as a trusted e-vapor brand for adult smokers. Looking ahead, we are confident that the company is well-positioned to further explore the enormous potential of this vast yet growing industry and achieve future growth in 2022 and beyond.”

  • Synthetic Nicotine Rule Clears Senate, Goes to Biden’s Desk

    Synthetic Nicotine Rule Clears Senate, Goes to Biden’s Desk

    Synthetic nicotine will now require U.S. Food and Drug Administration marketing approval. The U.S. Senate approved a $1.5 trillion legislation by a 68-31 bipartisan margin that includes language that changes the definition of a tobacco product to include synthetic nicotine. The Senate sent Biden the omnibus appropriations bill, and a separate bill financing agencies through Tuesday in case it takes time to complete the required reprinting and proofreading of the lengthy omnibus measure. Biden has said he will sign the bill into law.

    Credit: f11photo

     

    “We thank leaders in the House and Senate for their partnership in getting this bill done, and the President looks forward to signing it into law,” wrote White House spokesperson Jen Psaki in an email. “The bipartisan funding bill proves once more that members of both parties can come together to deliver results for the American people.”

    The rule will become law 30 days after the bill’s passage date. Manufacturers of currently marketed synthetic products would have an additional 60 days to file a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) without being subject to FDA enforcement—unless the FDA has already denied a non-synthetic version of the same product (meaning those manufacturers would be subject to enforcement 30 days after the passage of the bill).

    The language of the Tobacco Control Act would change to define a tobacco product as “any product made or derived from tobacco, or containing nicotine from any source, that is intended for human consumption,” when Biden signs the bill into law.

    Synthetic nicotine—nicotine that is made in a lab rather than derived from tobacco—has long existed in a legal grey area, and many companies started using it after their natural nicotine products were denied market access by the FDA. Public health groups have been warning that synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes, such as Puff Bar, have grown in popularity among teens while skirting FDA oversight.

    The House passed the bill late last night. Leaders in both parties have declared the legislation a win. Democrats boast of the almost 7 percent increase they secured for non-defense agencies, increasing that funding to $730 billion. Top Republicans tout the $782 billion they locked in for national defense, a 6 percent hike from current spending, according to Politico.

    Proponents of the policy change refer to it as closing a loophole. Meanwhile critics of the rider contend that, given the well documented flaws and deficiencies in the FDA approval process, the budget rider will likely result in the prohibition of products that former smokers have used to quit smoking and stay off cigarettes. Vaping advocates have been working on overdrive the last three days trying to get the nicotine rule removed form the bill.

    Amanda Wheeler, president of American Vapor Manufacturers association, said the of banning synthetic products is going to drive millions back to combustible cigarettes.

    “At a time when FDA is under scrutiny from multiple federal courts for unlawful regulatory overreach on nicotine, handing the agency even more powers to prevent Americans from switching to vaping is like handing car keys and a bottle opener to your drunk uncle,” she said. “It’s already lunatic that FDA is prohibiting adult American smokers from switching to vaping but this legislation is so absurd that it will extend FDA’s reach to products that have no actual, physical connection to tobacco whatsoever.

    “This bill ought to be called the Cigarette Protection Act, because the indisputable outcome will be countless more Americans pushed away from nicotine vaping and back into combustible smoking.”

  • Synthetic Rule Jumps House Hurdle, Senate Vote Next

    Synthetic Rule Jumps House Hurdle, Senate Vote Next

    Credit: Louis Velazquez

    The House passed a $1.5 trillion federal spending bill that includes language that gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration power over synthetic nicotine. The bill now moves to the Senate and, if passed, will require a presidential signature to become law.

    Not long after the 2,700-page spending bill was released early Wednesday and just hours before a scheduled vote, a number of Democrats privately registered their dismay with party leaders, raising the prospect that the entire package could collapse for lack of support. The dispute froze activity on the floor for hours as top Democrats rushed to salvage the spending measure, according to the New York Times.

    By midafternoon, Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California notified Democrats in a brief letter that the coronavirus money would be dropped.

    If the synthetic nicotine language remains in the bill and clears the Senate, Biden is expected to sign the measure. The rule will then become law 30 days after the bill’s passage date. Manufacturers of currently marketed synthetic products would have an additional 60 days to file a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) without being subject to FDA enforcement—unless the FDA has already denied a non-synthetic version of the same product (meaning those manufacturers would be subject to enforcement 30 days after the passage of the bill).

    If the spending bill currently under consideration passes, the language of the Tobacco Control Act would change to define a tobacco product as “any product made or derived from tobacco, or containing nicotine from any source, that is intended for human consumption.”