Tag: news

  • FDA Announcement on ENDS Marketing Expected Today

    FDA Announcement on ENDS Marketing Expected Today

    Photo: Grispb

    The U.S. vaping industry is about to change fundamentally. Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration must decide whether millions of electronic nicotine delivery systems are “appropriate for the protection of public health.” Products that don’t meet its standard will have to come off the market or risk enforcement by the agency.

    To date, vapor companies have operated without many of the restrictions on sales and marketing governing traditional cigarettes. But the FDA has come under increasing pressure from politicians and public health groups in recent years to limit the sale of vapes, largely over concerns about the products’ popularity with teenagers. E-cigarette companies argue that flavored vapes can help smokers switch to less-damaging nicotine products.

    Due to the cost and the complexity of submitting a premarket tobacco product application, industry observers expect only a handful of applications, submitted by wealthiest companies, to survive the vetting process. Many vaping products are produced by smaller companies that lack the resources to thoroughly answer FDA’s scientific questions about safety, according to Ken Warner, a professor emeritus of public health and tobacco control at the University of Michigan. “Large companies such as Juul only sell a handful of types of e-cigarettes, but have the financial resources to stack their applications to make them more likely to be cleared by the agency,” he told Politico.

    The FDA, which has said it will likely miss the Sept. 9 deadline for some applications, is prioritizing its review queue based on applicants’ market share. Juul Labs alone controls over 40 percent of the e-cigarette market.

    The agency has already rejected a significant share of the estimated 6.5 million applications it received from more than 500 companies. On Aug. 9, the agency issued a “refuse to file” letter to JD Nova Group, notifying the company that the applications it submitted for approximately 4.5 million of its products do not meet the filing requirements for a new tobacco product seeking a marketing order.

    In a statement, the FDA said the company’s applications for these products lacked an adequate environmental assessment. Under the FDA’s regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, an environmental assessment must be prepared for each proposed authorization.

    On Aug. 26, the agency issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) for about 55,000 flavored ENDS products from JD Nova Group, Great American Vapes and Vapor Salon. In a news release, the FDA explained that the applications from the three applicants lacked sufficient evidence that they have a benefit to adult smokers sufficient to overcome the public health threat posed by the levels of youth use of such products.

    According to Filter, the FDA on Aug. 31 denied an additional 800 flavored vaping products due to incomplete applications. The companies had reportedly planned to submit additional information after the Sept. 9, 2020, deadline. The FDA did not make a separate announcement of these denials on its website.

  • Juul Labs to Open Research Facility in North Carolina

    Juul Labs to Open Research Facility in North Carolina

    Photo: steheap

    Juul Labs plans to open a research facility in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, reports WRAL.

    The new facility is expected to create 35 full-time jobs, according to a company spokesman.

    “We will continue to seek to earn the trust of key stakeholders, including local officials, as we advance the potential for harm reduction for adult smokers while combating underage usage,” Juul said in a statement.

    In June, Juul Labs settled a lawsuit brough by North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, who accused the company of marketing its product to young people. Juul agreed to pay $40 million but denied wrongdoing or liability. North Carolina was the first state to take legal action against Juul.

    At least 13 states, including California, Massachusetts and New York, as well as the District of Columbia have filed similar lawsuits. The central claim in each case is that Juul knew, or should have known, that it was hooking teenagers on pods that contained high levels of nicotine.

    A lawsuit brought against Juul by North Carolina’s Wake County Public School System is currently ongoing.

    In 2020, e-cigarette usage decreased by 19.6 percent in high schoolers and among middle-schoolers by 4.7 percent according to the U.S. Federal Drug Administration. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contends nicotine can harm adolescent brain development.

  • Vuse Becomes No. 1 Global Vaping Brand

    Vuse Becomes No. 1 Global Vaping Brand

    Photo: BAT

    Vuse is now the No. 1 global vaping brand by value share, according to its manufacturer, BAT.

    Vuse is the category value share leader in four of the top five vapor markets (Canada, France, Germany and the U.K.), and BAT’s U.S. momentum in vapor means Vuse is now leader by value share in 22 states, up from 20 in July, BAT announced on its website.

    In May this year, BAT also announced that Vuse became the world’s first global carbon neutral vape brand.

    “We are delighted that Vuse has become the number one global vaping brand,” said Jack Bowles, CEO of BAT. “It is proof that we are building brands of the future, underpinned by strong innovation, as part of our vision for ‘A Better Tomorrow.’

    “In the first half, we delivered 50 percent New Category revenue growth and added 2.6 million consumers of our noncombustible products, our highest ever increase, to reach 16.1 million consumers. This momentum is powered by our strong global brands Vuse, Glo and Velo. Each New Category brand grew its category share by more than 280 base share points [bsp] across key markets and recorded volume growth of 70 percent or more.”

    At its half-year results, BAT reported that its vapor business performed strongly, with revenue up 59 percent, volume grew by 70 percent and consumer numbers were up by 0.9 million to reach 7.5 million. Since December 2020, Vuse’s value share is up 340 bps, reaching 34 percent in July 2021.

     

     

  • Riot Squad E-liquid PMTAs Move to Substantive Review

    Riot Squad E-liquid PMTAs Move to Substantive Review

    E-liquid manufacturer Riot Squad announced it’s premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA) have moved on to the substantive review phase of the regulatory process. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has until Sept. 9 to make a decision on the more than 2 million remaining PMTAs from the nearly 7 million submitted.

    Credit: Riot Labs

    Ben Johnson, Riot Squad’s CEO, said the company has always been positioned as a disruptor in the sector. “We had a laser-like focus on creating the most premium e-liquids on the market and coupled it with a brand with attitude,” he said. “The goal has always been to help people quit smoking. Continuous innovation – like our most recent PMTA going into the substantive review phase – and adopting a leadership role within the sector, is what will allow us to achieve that goal.”

    The UK-based company sells to 86 countries around the world, according to a press release. The substantive review phase the final stage before the FDA grants or denies a marketing order. In order to receive a marketing order, Riot Squad must provide sufficient data to ensure its products are appropriate for the protection of public health.

    The FDA has so far issued an estimated 34 marketing denial orders (MDO) for an estimated 360,000 products. The agency refused to file more than 4.5 million applications from the JD Nova Group.

    Riot Labs was established in 2016 by Johnson who has an extensive background in pharmaceuticals. He set out to build Riot Squad into an innovative brand, with the aim of “encouraging consumers to find the confidence to give up smoking and engage in a healthier alternative.”

    Update: On Sept. 8, 2021 Riot Squad received a marketing denial order (MDO) from the FDA for its flavored (other than tobacco) e-liquid PMTAs.

  • Calls for Action Against Noncompliant Products

    Calls for Action Against Noncompliant Products

    Photo: auremar

    The U.K. Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) is calling for tough action against resellers of noncompliant disposable vape products.

    During an investigation, the trade group found that there are significant numbers of noncompliant products entering the U.K. and being sold in particular by convenience shops and on major online marketplaces.

    “We are calling upon regulators and the online marketplaces to robustly enforce current regulations and do much more in order to ‘clean up’ the disposable vapes market,” said John Dunne, director general at the UKVIA, in a statement.

    The disposable vape sector has enjoyed a significant revival in recent years, appealing as an entry point for adult smokers looking to quit conventional cigarettes. However, an investigation by the UKVIA has identified that illegal products are re-entering the U.K. market. The problem, according to the group, lies with some distributors who are flouting U.K. regulations and managing to get these products imported into the country and sell them onto traders and retailers; as well as a lack of proper scrutiny on major online marketplaces.

    Disposable vapes are pre-filled with e-liquids and cost around £6 ($8.27) each. U.K. regulations stipulate that they should contain no more than 20mg/ml of nicotine, yet evidence collected by the UKVIA reveals that some listed as this amount contain higher concentrations of nicotine and some products are being openly sold with 50mg/ml strength. Furthermore, product packaging is often missing warnings about the nicotine content, which is a legal requirement.

    The UKVIA has been in discussions with the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which regulates vape products and trading standards, to address the situation. In a major crackdown on unscrupulous suppliers, the association is providing guidance on official distributors and disposable vape products to its members as well as looking at the idea of licensing vape shops to fund enforcement. It’s also working with manufacturers of disposable vapes to ensure they are doing all that is possible to monitor and audit their distributors.

    “Robust enforcement of the current regulations is the only answer and it’s needed now,” said Dunne. “We can provide support to the regulators and educate the industry on how to distinguish between what’s a compliant product or not; and we are in the process of doing this. However, we are not in a position to come down heavy on those breaking the law; that lies with the regulators.

     “The vaping sector’s reputation, that the industry has taken years to build up, and which has made it one of the most successful business markets in the 21st century to date, is being threatened by a minority intent on making a quick buck out of a popular product, and we will not stand back and just watch it happen. Disposables have a major role to play in the vape market, but like all products they need to adhere to the legislation.”

  • First Warnings After PMTA ‘Refuse to Accept’ Notices

    First Warnings After PMTA ‘Refuse to Accept’ Notices

    In August, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued 29 warning letters to firms it says were manufacturing and selling unauthorized electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products. The agency advised the companies that selling products which lack a marketing authorization is “illegal and therefore they cannot be sold or distributed in the U.S.” The companies did not submit a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) by the Sept. 9, 2020 deadline.

    Credit: Андрей Яланский

    While each of these 29 warning letters cites specific products as examples of tobacco products that lack the required premarket authorization, collectively these firms have listed a combined total of more than 268,000 products, according to the FDA.

    In a first for ENDS products, two of the warning letters went to companies for selling after their PMTAs were not accepted. “Both Vapor Boss, LLC, and Kaleidoscope Custom Vapor Lounge, LLC have continued to sell ENDS products after receiving “Refuse to Accept” (RTA) determinations from the agency following submission of their premarket tobacco applications,” the FDA stated. “These are the first warning letters issued for an application that was submitted by the Sept. 9, 2020 deadline that subsequently received a RTA determination.”

    Companies who receive an RTA determination must remove any products currently on the market or risk enforcement action by FDA, according to the agency. Companies may resubmit a complete application for these products at any time, however the products may not be marketed unless they receive a marketing granted order.

    FDA also issued the first warning letter to a company that submitted premarket applications for some, but not all, of its products. The company (Maduro Distributors d/b/a The Loon) submitted a premarket application covering 18 products, but it manufactures and sells additional products not covered by the premarket application and thus lacking premarket authorization.

    From January through August 2021, FDA has issued a total of 169 warning letters to firms selling or distributing more than 17 million unauthorized electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products and that did not submit premarket applications by the Sept. 9 deadline, according to the agency.

    On FDA’s Warning Letters page, you can find all of these warning letters by entering “Center for Tobacco Products” in the “Issuing Office” box in the “Filter by” section of the search tool.

  • FDA Issues MDOs to 31 More Firms for Faulty PMTAs

    FDA Issues MDOs to 31 More Firms for Faulty PMTAs

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration stated on Friday, Sept. 3 that it had issued another round of marketing denial orders to 31 companies encompassing an estimated 300,000 products. “After issuing marketing denial orders (MDOs) to three companies for their flavored [electronic nicotine-delivery systems] ENDS products last week, @FDATobacco issued MDOs to an additional 31 companies for approximately 300,000 flavored ENDS products from Aug 27 through Sept. 2,” the agency tweeted.

    Credit: Chase4Concept

    Several of the MDOs were issued to companies that are not confirmed to be currently marketing their products. The regulatory agency did not release the names of the companies.

    According to it’s website, the FDA does plan to release the names of the companies that received MDO. Previously, the agency only gave the names of the three manufacturers who it sent the first series of MDOs for a vapor products. “FDA understands that the public may be interested in the specific names of the currently marketed products subject to the negative decisions,” the FDA website states. “However, before releasing this information, FDA needs to ensure the Agency is not releasing the applicant’s commercial confidential information. Given the large number of products involved, sharing this information requires additional time and resources. Accordingly, FDA is actively exploring options related to this issue.”

    In a release, the FDA stated that companies receiving these MDOs may have submitted premarket applications for other products “(such as ENDS devices, tobacco-flavored ENDS, or menthol-flavored ENDS),” and those products, if still pending, remain under review at FDA.

    “FDA continues to make substantial progress reviewing the unprecedented number of applications received by the Sept. 9, 2020, court-ordered deadline for submission of premarket applications for deemed new tobacco products,” the release states. “The aggregate information on these actions will be provided within our regular updates on the Tobacco Product Applications: Metrics and Reporting page.”

    As of Sept. 3, the FDA website lists 27 companies that have been issued MDOs:

    • Great American Vapes
    • JD Nova Group LLC
    • Vapor Salon
    • Big Time Vapes
    • J-Vapor LLC dba North Shore Vapor
    • SS Vape Brands Inc. Dba Monster Vape Labs
    • Custom Vapors
    • The Vaping Tiger
    • Gothic Vapor
    • TrendSetters E-liquid LLC
    • SWT Global Supply
    • Diamond Vapor
    • American Vapor Group
    • MV Enterprises
    • Planet of the Vapes
    • CITTG dba Orgnx E Liquids
    • Vapors of Ohio Inc. dba Nostalgic Vapes
    • Buckshot Vapors Inc.
    • Royalty Premium E Juice
    • Imperial Vapors
    • Midwest Vape Supply
    • Dominant Vapor
    • Mountain Vaporz
    • Sir Vapes -A-Lot
    • Loveli Design LLC dba
    • Alice in Vapeland
    • Nicquid

    The first MDOs were announced on Aug. 26. The products from JD Nova Group, Great American Vapes and Vapor Salon didn’t provide adequate information to show their products offered enough benefit to adult smokers sufficient to overcome the public health threat posed by the “well-documented, alarming levels” of youth use of such products.

    The FDA has received applications from over 500 companies covering more than 6.5 million tobacco products. The agency refused to file more than 4.5 million applications from the JD Nova Group. The FDA has until Sept. 9, 2020 to make a decision on the remaining estimated 2 million remaining PMTAs.

  • Hong Kong May Ban All Vapor, Heated-Tobacco Products

    Hong Kong May Ban All Vapor, Heated-Tobacco Products

    The largest political party in Hong Kong has edged its support towards a ban on all vapor and heated-tobacco products. Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress (DAB) of Hong Kong lawmaker Wong Ting-kwong, chairman of the Bills Committee on Smoking, said the government has asked him to host a meeting next Friday to decide whether the government should finalize its stance on electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS).

    Photo Credits: Timothy S. Donahue

    According to reports, the DAB decided to throw their support behind the motion of a complete ban on the new tobacco products in a recent meeting, according to The Standard. With DAB lawmakers making up more than half of the committee on smoking members, the legislative amendment banning ENDS products is expected to be passed in this term. The proposed bill is aimed at amending the Smoking Ordinance by targeting ENDS products was introduced in February 2019 to outlaw the importation and sales – but not consumption – of ENDS products.

    Liberal Party’s Peter Shiu Ka-fai said that while 64 countries, including China, had started regulating ENDS products, authorities should handle e-cigarettes and heated-tobacco products separately, as there is currently insufficient evidence to ban heated-tobacco products. Shiu also added that it would be unfair to ban heated-tobacco products but not traditional cigarettes, given they are all tobacco products.

    The proposal was among four bills that the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region (LegCo), the unicameral legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, stopped working on last June. Legco stated at the time that it would not ban ENDS because “the products provide smokers with safer smoke-free alternatives.”

    However, after Beijing endorsed the Hong Kong government’s request to extend the Legco term by a year, a new bills committee was set up last November. It last met in June this year to discuss the bill.

    According to the Food and Health Bureau, the government plans to secure passage of the bill within the current Legco term, which will end in October, The Standard reports. Sales of e-cigarettes are currently banned in 30 jurisdictions, including Macau and Singapore.

  • FDA Sends PMTA Denial Orders to 3 More Companies

    FDA Sends PMTA Denial Orders to 3 More Companies

    All of the premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) that have received marketing denial orders (MDOs) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have been for flavored products other than tobacco. On Aug. 31, the agency issued MDOs to three companies for only their other-than-tobacco flavored e-liquids, bringing the total number of companies known to have received MDOs to six. According to Filter, approximately 800 PMTAs were denied in the recent round of denials.

    Credit: Veeranggull

    “Dimitris Agrafiotis, the self-described ‘Vapin’ Greek’ who runs International Vapor Solutions, a consultancy firm, told Filter that three e-liquid companies companies he represents—two of them large and one medium-sized—were sent marketing denial orders (MDOs) by the agency,” Alex Norcia writes. “None of the PMTAs Agrafiotis helped file were totally finished, and the companies’ intention was to send more data piecemeal to the agency as substantial product stability testing wrapped up. Agrafiotis said he could not reveal the names of the companies because of nondisclosure agreements.”

    Norcia was able to confirm that the FDA had issued additional MDOs, after it issued its first-ever MDOs for products from JD Nova Group, Great American Vapes and Vapor Salon for an estimated 55,000 products on Aug. 26. In its first MDO release, the agency stated that more marketing decisions would be forthcoming. The agency stated it would continue to review other premarket tobacco applications for non-tobacco flavored electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS) to determine whether there is sufficient product-specific scientific evidence of a benefit to adult smokers to overcome the risk posed to youth.

    “If the applications contain evidence of this type, the FDA will conduct further in‐depth scientific evaluation as to whether the evidence satisfies that statutory standard for authorization,” the FDA spokesperson explained to Norcia. “But in the absence of this evidence, the agency intends to issue an MDO. We know that flavored tobacco products are very appealing to young people, therefore assessing the impact of potential or actual youth use is a critical factor in our decision-making about which products may be marketed.”

    Many in the vaping industry believe that the FDA will not approve a PMTA for a non-tobacco flavored product. A major e-liquid manufacturer recently told Vapor Voice that the agency may not immediately enforce the marketing of some flavored e-liquids for open systems that have submitted a PMTA, but the agency “will never give marketing approval for a flavor other than tobacco and menthol.”

    The FDA’s review of new tobacco products before they can be legally marketed ensures that they meet the standard Congress set in the law to protect the public health, according to the agency. The agency noted that “the evidence of benefits to adult smokers for such products would likely be in the form of a randomized controlled trial or longitudinal cohort study.” The FDA stated that there is the possibility that other types of evidence may exists that could be adequate if sufficiently robust and reliable. However, because the evidence was absent in these applications, the FDA issued MDOs.

    The FDA has received applications from over 500 companies covering more than 6.5 million tobacco products. The agency refused to file more than 4.5 million applications from the JD Nova Group. According to the FDA release, the products subject to an MDO for a premarket application may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce. If the product is already on the market, the product must be removed from the market or risk enforcement.

    In June, the Agrafiotis’s three clients got a letter from the FDA that their PMTAs had been received and would be moving onto the review stage, according to the Filter story. Last week, his clients drafted letters to the FDA, stating that they would be sending further information. “They have done substantial scientific work and testing,” Agrafiotis said. “They invested some real money in this.” One company, which filed 45 product applications, spent close to $1 million. “Some of the PMTAs were not complete, and some of them were more complete than others.” Of all his clients’ applications, only those for tobacco or menthol flavors now remain pending.

    “It’s not clarified exactly why they were denied,” Agrafiotis said. “The FDA mentioned youth. The usual spiel. And I was honest with my clients that some of the product names might be considered appealing to youth by the FDA. I’m very honest with the industry.”

    Agrafiotis added that now each company he represents is moving into the synthetic nicotine space. One of the large companies is totally transitioning to synthetic nicotine, a legal gray area, because it does not want to spend any more money on the PMTA process. The other was beginning to explore synthetic nicotine as a stopgap solution while pursuing legal action against the FDA. Numerous companies that have received either a warning letter or MDA from the FDA have chosen to start using synthetic nicotine in order to attempt to avoid FDA regulation.

    The FDA has not stated whether or not it believes it has the authority to regulate synthetic nicotine.

  • Hemp Association Appoints 2 to Board of Directors

    Hemp Association Appoints 2 to Board of Directors

    The Hemp Industries Association (HIA) today announced that Jennifer Knaack, senior director of compliance and science for Koi CBD, and La Vonne Peck, co-Founder of Native Network Consulting, have been appointed to the HIA Board of Directors through 2022.

    Credit: Mex Chriss

    The vacancy appointments were made strategically to advance two of the HIA’s top hemp industry priorities: Elevating standards and sustainable development, according to a press release. “We are really lucky as an industry to have leaders willing to contribute their time and efforts to making it better,” said HIA’s president Mike Lewis. “La Vonne’s background helping indigenous groups to approach this plant as a socio-economic opportunity for their communities is going to be invaluable to our efforts to help farmers get the most value out of hemp. And Jan Knaack’s scientific expertise and focus on elevating standards are exactly what is most needed in the cannabinoids discussion we are having as an industry right now.”

    Peck has more than 20 years of experience supporting the economic development of native communities, and has assisted 65 tribes with cannabis planning, according to the release. “I hope having an indigenous citizen on the Board will open avenues in the future for our Tribal communities,” said Peck, who is the former Chairwoman of the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians in Southern California, and a current member of the California Cannabis Advisory Committee. “We have a Board with years of experience, and I look forward to working with them,” said La Vonne, whose company Native Networks Consulting has been a member of the HIA since 2016.

    Knaack earned a PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences from the University of Southern California and will occupy the seat designated for a cannabinoids expert on the Board and act as Chairperson of the HIA’s Cannabinoids Council, an ad hoc members group focused on elevating industry standards and scientific regulations that prioritize consumer safety. She has more than 15 years of experience in analytical chemistry including serving as a laboratory director and consultant for multiple cannabis testing laboratories.

    “The HIA has made such a great impact on this industry. I’m excited to join the other members of the Board and, through the Cannabinoids Council, to continue advocating for the development of hemp products from a scientific perspective —one that extends through extraction and testing of final products, and that includes safety and mechanisms of action.” Jen heads compliance and science for Koi CBD, a leading national producer and distributor of hemp extract products that is committed to the highest standards of scientific accuracy, consumer education, and safety.

    The Hemp Industries Association Board of Directors, currently at 11 members, is the governing body for the association and has seen service by numerous prominent hemp industry and activist leaders over its nearly 30-year history. Nominations for HIA’s 2021 Board Elections are underway now, with a slate of candidates to fill four upcoming vacancies to be announced in September. Business and farming members with at least two consecutive years of membership are eligible to stand as candidates.