Tag: regulation

  • FDA Denies First Menthol-Flavor PMTAs After Review

    FDA Denies First Menthol-Flavor PMTAs After Review

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) for several menthol-flavored vaping products marketed by Logic Technology Development. The products include the Logic Pro Menthol e-Liquid Package and Logic Power Menthol e-Liquid Package. It’s the first time the FDA has issued MDOs for menthol products after receiving a scientific review.

    The move seems inline with the regulatory agency’s goal to ban menthol flavors from tobacco products. The FDA also isn’t expected to approve any flavored vaping product other than tobacco. In June, the National Institutes of Health and the FDA gave the University of Louisville a $3.6 million grant to study the effects of flavorings like mango and bubblegum used in vaping products. The study is still being conducted.

    “Ensuring new tobacco products undergo premarket evaluation is a critical part of the FDA’s work to reduce tobacco-related disease and death,” said Brian King, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), in a release. “We remain committed to evaluating new tobacco products based on a public health standard that considers the risks and benefits of the tobacco product to the population as a whole.”

    Gregory Conley, director of legislative and external affairs for the American Vapor Manufacturers Association, told Vapor Voice the latest move by the FDA to ban menthol vaping flavors is reminiscent of the agency’s “fatal flaw” review of PMTAs that resulted in millions of denials. The term “fatal flaw” was used by the FDA for PMTA submissions that didn’t have specific studies. The term has been at the center of nearly all lawsuits filed against the FDA for its handling of the PMTA process.

    “The dysfunction at the FDA knows no bounds. For the last year-plus, the FDA has sat back deferred decision making on menthol vaping products,” Conley said. “Lest anyone believe that FDA was hard at work coming up with ways to achieve balance, today they revealed that their big plan for menthol vaping products is to follow the exact same ‘fatal flaw’ review process that has led to dozens of lawsuits being filed against the agency.”

    The agency stated that after reviewing the company’s premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs), the FDA determined that the applications “lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate that permitting the marketing of the products would be appropriate for the protection of the public health (APPH), the applicable standard legally required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.”

    The FDA stated that the evidence provided within Logic’s denied PMTAs did not demonstrate that menthol-flavored e-cigarettes are more effective in promoting “complete switching or significant cigarette use reduction” relative to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.

    The announcement is concerning, especially since CTP is undergoing an external review in which many industry stakeholders have called for a comprehensive plan for PMTA reviews, according to Tony Abboud, executive director of the Vapor Technology Association. He says that the FDA’s action raises at least four major concerns.

    “First, the announced rationale makes no mention of the net public health benefit prong, begging the question of whether FDA addressed that required element of the APPH test? Second, how is the public health benefitted by FDA’s approval of 123 new menthol cigarette/cigar products, given its inability to authorize a single less-harmful menthol vaping product?” Abboud asks. “Third, how can the Agency continue to rely on general (i.e., non-Logic specific) menthol youth data to impose a heightened Logic-specific cessation standard, especially given the dramatically reduced [National Youth Tobacco Survey] NYTS youth use rates and no apparent tie to Logic products?

    “Fourth, is the Agency undermining its proposed menthol cigarette rule, given that FDA’s science shows that half of the predicted quitters under the proposed standard must switch to menthol vapes, none of which have been authorized?”

    Logic must now decide if it will resubmit applications or submit new applications to address the deficiencies for the products that are subject to these MDOs. However, the FDA states that for non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes, including menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, “existing evidence demonstrates a known and substantial risk” with regard to youth appeal, uptake and use.

    “The FDA conducts a rigorous, scientific review of submitted premarket tobacco product applications, evaluating the data for each product to determine if it meets the public health standard,” said King. “In this case, the applicant did not provide sufficient scientific evidence to show that the potential benefit to adult smokers outweighs the risks to youth.”

    A recently accepted manuscript of an article set for publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research found that flavored vaping and other tobacco sales restrictions in California did not affect youth e-cigarette use.

    The MDO letter that Logic received today is not limited to the two products named above, according to the agency. In general, the FDA publicly names only products that the applicant is marketing to avoid potential disclosure of confidential commercial information.

    Any products subject to an MDO may not be offered for sale or distributed in the United States, or the FDA may take enforcement action. These products cannot be legally introduced into interstate commerce in the U.S. without risking FDA enforcement. In March, the FDA authorized several tobacco-flavored e-cigarette products from the company under the Logic Vapeleaf, Logic Power and Logic Pro brands, including devices. 

    In addition to ensuring that Logic complies with this order, the FDA intends to ensure compliance by distributors and retailers. Specifically, the FDA notes that all new tobacco products on the market without the “statutorily required premarket authorization” are marketed unlawfully and their distribution or sale is subject to enforcement action.

    Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice filed complaints for permanent injunctions in federal district courts against six e-cigarette manufacturers on behalf of the FDA. The cases represent the first time the FDA has initiated injunction proceedings to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act’s premarket review requirements for new tobacco products.

    Retailers should contact Logic with any questions about products in their inventory. 

  • China to Start Consumption Tax Nov. 1 for Vapes

    China to Start Consumption Tax Nov. 1 for Vapes

    Credit: Peangdao

    China’s Ministry of Finance will impose a consumption tax on e-cigarettes sold in China from Nov. 1, according to a notice published on Tuesday.

    The taxation policy will further entrench China’s once-scattered e-cigarette industry into the country’s state-backed tobacco monopoly, a major generator of tax revenue for the country, according to Reuters.

    According to the Ministry of Finance, a tax rate of 36 percent will be placed on the production or import of e-cigarettes, while an 11 percent tax will be placed on the wholesale distribution of e-cigarettes.

    Experts said that the annual sales revenue of domestic e-cigarette makers is about RMB20 billion ($27.36 billion), so the tax may contribute an additional RMB10 billion to the government’s annual revenue, according to The Global Times.

    China has long been the world’s largest producer of e-cigarettes, though consumption lags behind that of Western countries.

  • Mexico Invents Aerosol Test for Vapes ‘Since None Exist’

    Mexico Invents Aerosol Test for Vapes ‘Since None Exist’

    Credit: Niyazz

    A health regulatory body for Mexico’s government says its scientists have developed a new methodology to analyze the aerosols in electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS) because “no one else has come up with one.” The sale of ENDS products was banned in Mexico in June.

    Final results of a new analysis of ENDS products using the new method will be published in scientific journals in the coming months, according to Cofepris chief Alejandro Svarch, who added that the “pioneering methodology” developed in Mexico will be of interest to health authorities in other countries.

    Aerosol testing has been performed on vaping products since at least 2014 in other countries, such as the U.S. and the UK. Svarch offered no explanation on how Mexico’s new testing method is performed or why it is effective or why other methods were not effective, only that a testing method “did not exist.” There was no mention of what products were tested or at what temperatures.

    He said an analysis using the exclusive method by health regulator Cofepris detected “30 undisclosed substances in aerosols inhaled” via ENDS products.

    Linalool, which can be used as an insecticide, was one of the substances detected, Svarch said during Mexican President López Obrador’s press conference last week.

    “This in itself is an enormous deception of consumers, who trust that the product is less harmful than a conventional cigarette, because it [supposedly] only has flavorings and nicotine, when in fact, it has other kinds of substances or ingredients that are highly dangerous for humans,” Svarch said.

    Among the “hidden” ingredients that “producers of vaping devices don’t want us to know about,” he said, are dimethyl ether, benzyl alcohol, ethyl propionate, isoamyl acetate, butyl acetate and methyl cinnamate.

    Svarch also presented a song commissioned by Cofepris (song starts at 1:40) that warns of the risks of vaping and advises ENDS users to “give up now.”

    Among the cautionary tales offered via the song’s lyrics are the cases of a woman who lost three teeth due to vaping and a handsome man who became known as “burnt face” because his “beloved vape” exploded while he was using it, according to media reports.

  • Irish Minister: Disposable Vapes ‘Worsen the World’

    Irish Minister: Disposable Vapes ‘Worsen the World’

    Credit: Schankz

    Single use vapes have been described as “worsening the world” amid plans for their ban by Minister for State Ossian Smyth.

    The Minister stated that single use disposable vapes could be banned under the Circular Economy Act or the single use plastic directive.

    However, Smyth said that a ban would not come into effect before consultations with the general public and sellers took place. He told listeners on RTE’s Morning Ireland that vapes had now become the default option for smokers, as they are typically half the cost of cigarettes.

    “If you were at the Electric Picnic festival earlier this summer, you would’ve seen these brightly coloured tubes all over the ground,” he said. “They’re everywhere and they are an innovation that has made the world a worse place.”

    The Green Party politician also admitted that a complete ban would be unlikely as people would still attempt to purchase single use vapes online. However, he reassured listeners that it would “massively reduce” their purchase and ultimate benefit public health.

  • British Columbia, Juul Labs Litigation to Proceed

    British Columbia, Juul Labs Litigation to Proceed

    Photo: niroworld

    The Supreme Court of British Columbia has dismissed an application from Altria Group to stay or dismiss proceedings against the company in a class action against Juul Labs, reports The Lawyer’s Daily. Altria owns 35 percent of Juul.

    The claim alleges that Altria conspired with Juul in the sale of nicotine vaping devices, to youth in particular, with the goal “to convert them into smokers” in part through nicotine addiction.

    The class action was initially filed in September 2019, shortly after Health Canada issued an advisory for vapers to “monitor themselves for symptoms of pulmonary illness … and to seek medical attention promptly if they have concerns about their health.”

    “This is an important decision that ensures that Canadians are able to sue all the parties that they allege have harmed them,” said Daniel Bach, a partner in Siskinds, about the Supreme Court decision. “We look forward to litigating these issues against Altria on the merits.”

    Juul has been pummeled by lawsuits and mounting restrictions on the production and sale of vaping products in recent years. The e-cigarette maker has suffered financially as a result.

    Since 2019, Juul has halted all U.S. advertising, discontinued most of its flavors and attempted to rebrand itself as a product for older smokers who seek alternatives to cigarettes.

    According to press reports, Juul has been preparing to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

    This was the second appeal by Altria in this class action that British Columbia courts have dismissed. In October 2021, the B.C. Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal to an order allowing cross-examination on its affidavits in the company’s jurisdictional challenge.

  • Hong Kong: Vape Dollars Make Sense for Ban Reversal

    Hong Kong: Vape Dollars Make Sense for Ban Reversal

    It was all about public health, now it seems to be about the money. Hong Kong may reverse its ban on the re-export of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, reports the South China Morning Post, citing unnamed sources.

    Credit: Timothy S. Donahue

    In April, the city prohibited the sale, manufacture and trade in alternative smoking products.

    Authorities are now reportedly considering amending law, with eye on the billions of dollars that trade generates annually.

    Hong Kong is close to Shenzhen, the world’s largest manufacturing hub for vapor devices.

  • Keller & Heckman Annual Vapor Symposium Feb. 15-16

    Keller & Heckman Annual Vapor Symposium Feb. 15-16

    The Keller and Heckman law firm will hold its annual E-Vapor and Tobacco Law Symposium on Feb. 15-16, 2023, at the Courtyard Irvine Spectrum in Irvine, California, USA.

    This year’s program will feature topics designed to help vapor and deemed tobacco product manufacturers stay in compliance with rapidly evolving laws and policies, according to Keller and Heckman.

    The conference will cover marketing denial orders (MDOs), U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed rulemakings and youth access prevention plans, among other topics.

    For more information, visit the symposium information webpage.

  • FDA Denies Nearly 95% of Synthetic Nicotine PMTAs

    FDA Denies Nearly 95% of Synthetic Nicotine PMTAs

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administartion today announced that, as of Oct. 7, the agency has issued refuse to accept (RTA) letters for more than 889,000 products in premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) that do not meet the criteria for acceptance.

    The agency also announced it FDA has accepted over 1,600 applications, with the vast majority being for e-cigarette or e-liquid products.  

    “While the application review is ongoing, FDA remains vigilant in overseeing the market and will continue to use our compliance and enforcement resources to curb the unlawful marketing of [non-tobacco nicotine] NTN products. To date, FDA has issued a total of over 60 warning letters to manufacturers, including brands popular among youth such as Puff Bar,” the FDA stated in a release. “The manufacturer warning letters include those for products for which an application had been submitted but where the agency has taken a negative action, such as a [RTA].”

    The FDA has also issued over 300 warning letters to retailers for violations in relation to their sale of NTN products to underage purchasers, and imposed civil money penalties against two retailers for sales of NTN products to underage purchasers. 

    “To date, the FDA has not authorized any NTN products. Therefore, all NTN products on the market are marketed unlawfully and risk FDA enforcement action,” the FDA stated. “It is illegal for a retailer or distributor to sell or distribute e-cigarettes that the FDA has not authorized, and those who engage in such conduct are at risk of FDA enforcement, such as a seizure, injunction, or civil money penalty.”

    All authorized e-cigarettes are posted on FDA’s Tobacco Product Marketing Orders page.

  • FDA Gives Most Warning Letters to Small Companies

    FDA Gives Most Warning Letters to Small Companies

    Photo: Postmodern Studio

    Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration oversight of the vaping industry in the U.S. is likely to have minimal impact, suggests an analysis of the regulator’s warning letters for marketing violations, published online in the journal Tobacco Control.

    The regulator is failing to target the key players or the products most popular with young people, the analysis suggests, with over 90 percent of warnings sent to small online retailers rather than leading tobacco companies, and a focus on refillable devices.

    While the prevalence of vaping among U.S. adults remains low, at just under 4 percent in 2020, it is four times higher among young people.

    In 2016, the FDA announced plans to regulate the vaping industry, including a requirement for the manufacturers of e-cigarettes to obtain premarket approval (PMTA) to ensure that their products protect public health.

    In 2017, the regulator began sending warning letters to manufacturers, retailers and distributors for potential violations, such as advertising to young people, selling to minors, packaging or labeling that contravened regulations, and failure to apply for a PMTA.

    But little is known about who received these letters, the types of product they concerned, or details of the violations and their consequences.

    To try and find out, researchers from Truth Initiative assessed the content and recipients of publicly available FDA warning letters issued in 2020 and 2021. In total, the FDA issued 303 warnings: 126 in 2020 and 177 up to Sept. 9, 2021.

    The analysis revealed that in 2021, over 98 percent of all the targeted companies fulfilled all three roles (manufacturer, distributor and retailer).

    But nearly all the letters (97 percent) were sent to small online retailers, none of which were large companies with measurable market share, as evidenced by sales data.

    Companies were cited for between one and three infractions. Most involved failure to obtain a PMTA. In 2020 and 2021, respectively, 56 percent and 99 percent-plus of the infractions concerned a PMTA violation.

    And more than 90 percent of the products cited—880 different ones in total—were flavored refillable e-cigarette liquids rather than the disposable vaping devices that the evidence indicates are most popular with young people.

    Penalties ranged in severity from product detention to product seizure and fines. But loss of tobacco distributor license and criminal charges appeared less frequently in both years than these other consequences.

    At the time of the review, most (72 percent) of the websites cited for 2020 infractions were still operating as were 29 percent of websites cited for 2021 infractions.

    And as the authors note, it was impossible to find out how the targeted companies responded and whether the FDA followed through with the consequences cited in the warning letters because that information isn’t publicly available.

    “While current research estimates that online sales comprise around one-third of the marketplace, data tell us that most young people get their products from friends (32.3 percent), buy them from another person (21.5 percent) or purchase from a vape shop (22.2 percent),” the authors noted in a statement.

    “Prioritizing the products most accessed by youth, which are made available from a variety of sources, will be important to curb youth use,” they add.

    “Strong, impactful and transparent consequences need to be in place to prevent the sale of products that violate regulations necessary in protecting the health of adult users of e-cigarettes and preventing youth use alike,” the authors added.

    “The FDA should use its enforcement powers to target the manufacturing, distribution and sellers of the tobacco products that have the greatest impact on youth and products that provide no public health benefit.”

  • ‘U.K. Unlikely to Enact Khan Recommendations’

    ‘U.K. Unlikely to Enact Khan Recommendations’

    Photo: William Richardson

    The U.K. government is unlikely to enact the actions recommended by Javed Khan in his recent report on smoking, according to an article in The Guardian citing insiders.

    The British government has committed to make the country “smoke-free” by 2030. This defined as getting the proportion of adults who smoke down from 14.1 percent to just 5 percent.

    Published in June, Khan’s report says that ministers need to accelerate the reduction in smoking by 40 percent if want were to hit the 2030 target. Among other actions, he recommended raising the legal age of buying tobacco by a year every year and putting, imposing a new “polluter pays” levy on tobacco firms, and requiring sellers of tobacco products to have a license.

    According to The Guardian, U.K. Health Secretary Thérèse Coffey also intends to break her predecessor’s promise to publish an action plan to tackle smoking.

    The paper writes that Coffey has previously accepted hospitality from the tobacco industry. Since becoming an MP in 2010 she has voted in the House of Commons against an array of measures to restrict smoking, including the ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces, the outlawing of smoking in cars containing children and forcing cigarettes to be sold in plain packs.

    The Department of Health and Social Care said it was “inaccurate” to suggest that the tobacco control plan was being dropped—but did not say if or when it would publish it.

    Labour and anti-smoking campaigners voiced alarm at the potential U-turn over the tobacco control plan. It follows a Treasury-ordered review of measures to tackle obesity, and Coffey scrapping a promised white paper on health inequalities.