Tag: regulation

  • FDA Suspends Juul Market Ban Pending Court Appeal

    FDA Suspends Juul Market Ban Pending Court Appeal

    Photo: steheap

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has temporarily halted its ban on Juul Labs products while the e-cigarette maker appeals the agency’s decision, the FDA announced on Twitter.

    On June 23, the FDA ordered Juul Labs to pull its e-cigarettes from U.S. store shelves, saying the e-cigarette manufacturer had submitted insufficient evidence that they were “appropriate for the protection of the public health.”

    A federal appeals court then granted Juul Labs a emergency stay of the order to give the judges time to evaluate the merits of Juul’s appeal. The e-cigarette company separately asked the FDA to stay its own order pending the appeal.

    In a series of Twitter messages, the FDA said it had determined that there are scientific issues unique to the Juul application that warrant additional review. The agency stressed that the stay suspends but does not rescind it the marketing denial order (MDO).

    The FDA initially rejected Juul’s request for a stay, prompting Juul to seek a stay of the ban in court, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    In its court filing challenging the FDA ruling, Juul said the agency had overlooked more than 6,000 pages of data that the company had submitted to the FDA on the aerosols that users inhale. Juul also suggested that the FDA’s decision was influenced by political pressure.

    The FDA’s marketing denial order for Juul surprised many in the vaping business, especially in the wake of marketing authorizations for vapor products manufactured by competitors such as Reynolds American Inc. and NJOY Holdings. A pioneer in the vaping segment and backed by Altria Group—a company boasting decades of experience with regulatory compliance—Juul labs appeared in a better position than most to meet the agency’s exacting standards.

    Public health advocates criticized the stay of the FDA ruling.

    “It is deeply disappointing and harmful to our nation’s kids that the FDA has issued an administrative stay of its marketing denial order for Juul’s e-cigarette products,” wrote Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, in a statement.

    “This decision will allow the continued sale, at least for now, of the brand most responsible for creating and fueling the youth e-cigarette epidemic. We are nearly 10 months past a court-ordered deadline for the FDA to complete its review of e-cigarette marketing applications and can’t afford more delays by the FDA in removing kid-friendly products from the market.”

  • Activists Outraged Over Australian Vaping Policy

    Activists Outraged Over Australian Vaping Policy

    Photo: pixarno

    Tobacco harm reduction activists are outraged over a new Australian government document on vaping.

    The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) recently published its 2022 CEO Statement on Electronic Cigarettes, which provides guidance to public health policymakers.

    According to the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), the document falsely claims that vaping is not an effective quit-smoking tool, but a gateway to smoking with most vapers becoming dual users. Vaping, the document states, also increases the risk of smoking relapse. The NHMRC exaggerates the health impacts, poisoning and explosion risks of e-cigarettes, according to CAPHRA, while references to toxins and potential harms are made without a fair comparison to smoking.

    “This latest government document on vaping makes outrageously false claims and will only cost more Australian smokers their lives,” says Nancy Loucas, executive coordinator of CAPHRA.

    “Ridiculously, Australia’s chief medical officer considers vaping the next biggest health issue after COVID-19. Has he ever heard of smoking which kills over 20,000 Australians every year? This 18-page document is a complete joke. It is full of statements that can be easily debunked by international science and human evidence the world over,” says Loucas.

    This egregious document is not worth the paper it’s written on, yet it’s now the bible for public health guidance in and around Australia.

    CAPHRA says Australia’s hardline anti-vaping approach is increasingly out of step with other Asia Pacific countries, with the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand set to lift their vaping bans. What’s more, New Zealand, across the Tasman, is already operating under a regulatory framework that has seen smoking rates decline.

    “This egregious document is not worth the paper it’s written on, yet it’s now the bible for public health guidance in and around Australia,” says Loucas.

    It is illegal to sell, supply or possess nicotine vaping products, with Australia the only Western democracy that requires a nicotine prescription to vape. Alarmingly, 2.3 million Australians continue to smoke cigarettes.

    Last year Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration expanded its prescription-only model with customs clamping down at the border on the likes of personal imports of nicotine vaping liquids from overseas websites.

  • Bentley: Juul Exit Threatens Progress in Harm Reduction

    Bentley: Juul Exit Threatens Progress in Harm Reduction

    Photo: steheap

    The Food and Drug Administration’s order to remove Juul products from the U.S. market threatens progress in tobacco harm reduction, according to Guy Bentley, director of consumer freedom at the Reason Foundation.

    Guy Bentley

    Writing on the foundation’s website, Bentley reminds his audience that e-cigarettes are not only less harmful than their combustible counterparts, but they are also more effective in helping smokers quit than FDA-approved therapies such as nicotine gum and patches

    The FDA, he writes, acknowledged as much when it authorized Vuse e-cigarettes in 2021 and claims it recognizes the role these safer nicotine alternatives can play in reducing smoking.

    If the Juul order is implemented, says Bentley, many Juul users will likely return to smoking, while a portion of smokers who would have transitioned to Juul will continue to light up.

    Bentley says the FDA Juul denial makes a mockery of the claim that it’s evaluating science in the best interests of public health. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found e-cigarettes to be twice as effective as traditional nicotine replacement therapies.

    According to Bentley, the decision also punctures a hole in the logic of the FDA’s recently announced policy to reduce nicotine levels in cigarettes to minimally or non-addictive levels. Without an acceptable legal alternative, smokers may simply smoke more cigarettes to get their nicotine fix.

    “By banning the most popular e-cigarette among adults, the agency’s commitment to transitioning smokers to safer alternatives rings hollow,” writes Bentley.

  • Juul: FDA ‘Overlooked’ 6,000 Pages of Aerosol Data

    Juul: FDA ‘Overlooked’ 6,000 Pages of Aerosol Data

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration overlooked a key part of Juul’s premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) when the agency ordered Juul Labs’ products off the U.S. market, according to court documents.

    In court filings Tuesday, Juul said the agency overlooked more than 6,000 pages of data that the company had submitted to the FDA on the aerosols that users inhale, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    Juul also said the agency failed to consider the totality of Juul’s evidence, which the company said established that the public-health benefits of Juul products significantly outweighed the potential risks.

    “FDA’s order acknowledged that ‘exposure to carcinogens and other toxicants present in cigarette smoke were greatly reduced with exclusive use’ of Juul products compared with combustible cigarettes,” Juul Labs stated in court documents.

    The company added that the decision was reached “against a backdrop of immense political pressure” from Congressional lawmakers who “tainted the entire agency process” by pushing for a Juul ban. Juul officials say its products are held to a different regulatory standard than those made by rivals.

    “If the court does not intervene, [Juul Labs] products will disappear from store shelves and politics will have won over sound science and evidence,” the filing said.

    A federal appeals court last week granted Juul Labs a temporary stay of the FDA’s marketing denial order that requires the vaping company to pull its e-cigarettes off the U.S. market.

    “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider petitioner’s forthcoming emergency motion for stay pending court review and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the court wrote.

    The FDA has until July 7 to respond to Juul’s motion and Juul Labs has until July 12 to reply to the FDA response if submitted.

    “Having received the emergency temporary stay, we are now seeking the ability to continuously offer our products to adult smokers throughout our appeal with the court and science- and evidence-based engagement with our regulator,” said Joe Murillo, Juul Labs’ chief regulatory officer.

    Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that the company is mulling a potential bankruptcy filing if the FDA ban is upheld.

  • Bangladesh Mulls Ban on E-Cigarettes and Pouches

    Bangladesh Mulls Ban on E-Cigarettes and Pouches

    Photo: sezerozger

    Bangladesh’ Ministry of Health and Family Welfare wants to amend the country’s tobacco act to ban e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches, reports The Business Standard. The proposal also includes new restrictions on combustible tobacco products.

    Health activists have been calling for prohibition of e-cigarettes, which are not mentioned in the current legislation. The proposal would prohibit not only the consumption of vapor products, but also the production, import, export, storage, sale and transportation of e-cigarettes or their parts.

    People caught vaping would face maximum fine of BDT5,000 ($53.80) under the plan, while producers and traders would risk imprisonment for a maximum of six months or a fine not exceeding BDT200,000 or both for the first time. The punishment would double each time the offence is repeated.

    E-cigarettes started arriving informally in Bangladesh a few years ago and quickly became popular. As demand increased, British American Tobacco started producing and selling e-cigarettes in the market. Japan Tobacco is also reportedly preparing to market e-cigarettes in Bangladesh.

    The health ministry’s proposal would also tighten restrictions on traditional tobacco products. Among other provisions, it includes a ban on flavors and an increase in the size of graphic health warnings to 90 percent of the packaging’s surface from the 50 percent required under current legislation. The draft also foresees new retail licensing requirements and limitation on where tobacco can be sold.

    The health ministry has recently sent copies of the draft to stakeholders. The Directorate General of Health Services is accepting opinions on the draft until July 14.

  • Juul Expected to be Pulled From Market Soon

    Juul Expected to be Pulled From Market Soon

    Let the shock settle in. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is preparing to order Juul Labs to take its e-cigarettes off the market in the United States, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.

    Todd Cecil, deputy director for the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products’ Office of Science, told Vapor Voice during the Next Generation Nicotine Delivery seminar in Miami that he could not make a comment on the Juul decision until the FDA formerly issues a marketing denial order (MDO).

    The news sent Altria’s stock (MO) on a massive drop, falling more than 10 percent once the news broke.

    Wells Fargo analyst Bonnie Herzog wrote in an email that while the news comes as a bit of a surprise, she doesn’t believe all is lost for Altria and the company has several options it can pursue, adding that the sell-off today is overdone with the stock having lost an estimated $7 billion of market capital.

    “First, assuming the FDA does in fact issue an MDO for Juul, we believe the impact is far from certain given Juul’s likely options to appeal or challenge it (via a court decision similar to Kaival Brands’ approach for Bidi Vapor Sticks and IMB’s use of the appeals process for myblu), revise its [premarket tobacco product application] PMTA application, or sue the FDA altogether,” wrote Herzog. “Also, with no detail yet on the FDA’s rationale, it is tough to know how the agency is thinking about an MDO on Juul in the context of its broader efforts to encourage adult smokers to quit and/or move down the continuum of risk to less harmful alternatives (e.g., e-vapor, heat-not-burn, oral nicotine pouches, etc) especially given Juul’s critical leadership in e-cigs.

    “While it is unclear how the FDA is thinking about the remaining PMTAs that are pending (especially the popular VUSE Alto line), we have a hard time imagining the FDA would categorically remove highly popular e-cig brands without ensuring a suitable off-ramp for users (that isn’t back to combustible cigs).”

    It is expected that Juul will receive the MDO in a response to its PMTA because of its product’s potential to appeal to youth. The company has also seen a slump in sales recently, and has been taken over by RJ Reynolds Vapor Company’s Vuse brand e-cigarette in Nielsen rankings for the last two quarters.

    “We expect the company to appeal, with the products remaining on the market,” Vivien Azer, managing director for cannabis, consumer beverages and tobacco at Cowen Inc., New York, said in a research note.

    George Cassels-Smith, CEO of Tobacco Technologies, says Juul receiving an MDO is ridiculous. “For a company that has that has been a standard in this industry and has some of the highest quality products on the market, its shocking,” he said. “The company has tried hard to move past its early issues of appealing to youth. This isn’t appropriate for the protection of public health and it isn’t good for the industry. It hurts adult smokers because Juul is a product that is successful in helping smokers switch.”

    The decision is likely celebrated by some anti-nicotine groups who say Juul is the cause of the rise in teen vaping. That rise has also declined dramatically over the last 2-3 years. Recently, Juul Labs also settled several lawsuits related to youth marketing. Juul Labs — until recently the market leader in e-cigarette product sales — admitted to no wrongdoing in any of its settlements.

    Tony Abboud, executive director of the Vapor Technology Association (VTA) said that he was surprised by the news because Juul was always expected to get an approval order.

    “The reported denial of Juul’s PMTA application is stunning. While the company has certainly been at the epicenter of conflict, the amount of rigorous, peer reviewed science supporting their products’ ability to help smokers quit, raises serious questions about the FDA’s subjective balancing test, and whether public pressure campaigns will steer science policy,” said Abboud.

    Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) strongly condemned the decision. Tim Andrews, ATR’s director of consumer issues, said the Juul MDO will devastate public health across the country, and lead to easily preventable deaths.

    “Juul’s reduced risk tobacco alternatives are critical tools of smoking cessation that have been proven to help cigarette smokers across the U.S. save their lives through transitioning away from deadly combustible tobacco,” he said. ““This is a decision grounded in ideology, not science. It is a decision that will cause countless deaths that could have otherwise been prevented. For the sake of public health, it is a decision we hope will be overturned in the courts on appeal.”

    In 2018, Altria spent nearly $13 billion taking a 35 percent stake in Juul. The company has taken non-cash charges on the investment as regulatory scrutiny of Juul and its marketing practices have impacted sales. As of March 31, Altria said the estimated fair value of its investment in Juul was $1.6 billion.

    In 2019, Juul Labs announced it was suspending its print, broadcast and online advertising in the United States. That same year it halted the sale of its fruit and dessert flavors — including mango, creme brulee and cucumber — that were seen as a significant lure for teen users. The FDA also recently instituted a proposed rule to place a ban on menthol combustible cigarettes and flavored cigars. The menthol ban will not yet cover next-generation tobacco products, such as e-cigarettes, but the FDA has the authority to include them if it sees fit.

    Juul Labs submitted its PMTAs in July 2020. At the time, the company said its submission included comprehensive scientific evidence for the Juul device and Juul pods in Virginia Tobacco and Menthol flavors at nicotine concentrations of 5.0 percent and 3.0 percent, as well as information on its data-driven measures to address underage use of its products.

    Juul will not join NJOY as the only FDA-approved closed system, pod-style vaping device. The FDA is expected to make decisions on additional vaping brands that submitted timely PMTAs soon.

    Now that at the FDA has approved a quality vaping product in Njoy, many tobacco harm reduction groups are hoping the FDA publicly clarifies that vaping is a less risky alternative to smoking combustible. A recent Rutgers University study found that more than 60 percent of all doctors incorrectly believe all tobacco products are equally harmful, making them less likely to recommend e-cigarettes for people trying to quit smoking.

  • Sweden: Lawmakers Reject Vapor Flavor Ban

    Sweden: Lawmakers Reject Vapor Flavor Ban

    Photo: WDnet Studio

    Sweden’s Parliament, the Riksdag, rejected a ban on sales of flavored vaping products, with 177 lawmakers voting against the proposal and 126 lawmakers voting in favor, reports Vaping360.

    Introduced by the government’s Ministry of Social Affairs in late February, the new rules would have taken effect next January, and would have prohibited flavors other than tobacco in all e-liquid, including zero-nicotine vape juice.

    In rejecting the proposal, lawmakers heeded the advice of the Riksdag’s social affairs committee, which had recommended adopting proposed regulations for nicotine pouches and synthetic nicotine but eliminating the flavor ban.

    Seven other European countries have banned non-tobacco vape flavors. In Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Hungary and Ukraine, flavored vape restrictions are currently in place. Lithuania’s flavor ban will take effect July 1. In the Netherlands, the flavor prohibition scheduled to begin in July has been postponed until January 2023.

    No European country has banned vaping products outright.

  • Canada Proposes New Vapor Disclosure Requirements

    Canada Proposes New Vapor Disclosure Requirements

    Photo: DD Images

    The Canadian government wants vapor product manufacturers to disclose information about their sales  and the ingredients used in their products.

    On June 17, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health Carolyn Bennett announced the launch of a 45-day public consultation period on the proposed rules.

    “Canada’s vaping market is evolving rapidly,” Health Canada wrote in a press release. “A large number of vaping substances are available across the country and new formulations are frequently introduced with new flavors. Health Canada is restricted in its capacity to properly track market trends due to limited access to information on vaping products sales and composition.”

    According to Health Canada, the proposed regulations are the first step of a gradual approach to introducing vaping product reporting requirements. Health Canada is considering additional reporting requirements for implementation in the future similar to those already in place for tobacco products. This could include reporting on information related to research and development as well as promotional activities. It could also include disclosing some information to the public which would increase industry transparency.

    “As the vaping market continues to evolve rapidly and entice Canadians, including young people, to use vaping products, we are taking action to better protect everyone in Canada by more fully understanding the impact of these products on their health,” said Bennett. “The proposed regulations will help us educate Canadians about the health harms while furthering research aimed at reducing the amount of people impacted by harms related to tobacco and vaping product use across the country.” 

    The proposed regulations have been published in the Canada Gazette. Stakeholders can submit comments to mailto:mpregs@hc-sc.gc.ca until Aug. 2.

  • Senator Durbin Continues Cries to FDA Over PMTAs

    Senator Durbin Continues Cries to FDA Over PMTAs

    Dick Durbin
    Credit: Durbin.gov

    U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin today met virtually with six public health organizations regarding what he calls a failure of the U.S Food and Drug Administration to fulfill its obligation to regulate e-cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act.

    In 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland mandated that FDA finalize its premarket tobacco product applications under review by September 9, 2021.

    As FDA has delayed for more than nine months past that deadline on finalizing its reviews.

    During his meeting with these health groups, Durbin discussed his recent statement for FDA Commissioner Robert Califf to “immediately clear the market of unauthorized, kid-friendly e-cigarettes or step aside,” according to River Bender.

    “We know that kids are getting hooked on these flavored e-cigarettes that are specifically targeted to children, like JUUL. Yet FDA has decided to cower to Big Tobacco and ignore the addiction of children as the agency wrings its hands over e-cigarette applications,” said Durbin.

    “I’m grateful for the leadership of these health organizations, and together, we will do our best to ensure there is responsible, active leadership at FDA that will take the issue of nicotine addiction seriously.”

  • Pennsylvania Court Overturns THC Vape Recall

    Pennsylvania Court Overturns THC Vape Recall

    Credit: J Zehnder

    Marijuana vapes are again legal in Pennsylvania.

    A Commonwealth Court judge on Wednesday allowed Pennsylvania medical marijuana companies to resume selling vapes that were taken off the shelves in February in a controversial recall. The state is expected to appeal the ruling.

    “We are thrilled about this decision,” said Judith D. Cassel, an attorney for a group of cannabis companies that sued state regulators in February, alleging that the recall was unfounded, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

    “The vapes can go immediately back on the shelves and the grower processors can continue or commence producing these vapes,” said Cassel, a partner at Hawke McKeon & Sniscak LLP in Harrisburg.

    The ruling is a blow to the Pennsylvania Department of Health, which in February mandated a massive recall and ban of 670 types of cannabis concentrates for vaping — 330,000 units — that they had previously approved for sale in Pennsylvania’s more than 150 marijuana dispensaries